HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 7:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1227
Location: In the industry
Someone suggest the ti bike should have its own thread -- so here it goes.

Ti bikes always mean something special to me, so now that I am going at it, I wasn't going to skip ti...

And several months into the project, I have a finished product. I call it the "Eternity". At first glance, there is nothing special about it, but that was deliberate. Ti bikes should have a classic look. Tapered head tube and top tube, oversized downtube, PF30, were the key features.

As I have a personal weakness for ISP, I had one made on this as well. Geometry mimicks the carbon bike, except with a slightly slacker seat angle (due to no-offset seatpost) and slightly longer top tube to compensate.

The cable routing is similar to the carbon bike but since Ti can't be made into a monocoque, I had to do some thinking about how to route the rear shifting cable. Intially I thought about an external hook along the seat tube cluster but decided against it for the sake of big-thighed riders. In the end, I decided to route it through the seat tube. A tiny (2.4mm ID) ti tube welded inside, against which the cable slides, was the answer. The tube had to be strengthened here. The cable stopper near the rear dropout was hidden (in side view) right behind the seat tube. See pic below.

Dropouts were a main head ache. Light, beautiful, affordable, seems I can only pick 1 out of the 3 with any one option. I have some wing'ed equivalent of the Lynskey Shamrock dropout, but ended up not using it.

For riding comfort, I have opted for an 28.6 seat tube with a 31.8 topper (which is butted externally so OD is 30.4~31.8). For big riders, it will probably be better to go with 31.8 seat tube with a 34.8 topper.

The frame came in at around 1450g, which I am happy with, because firstly it's an ISP frame, and secondly, I know for a bit extra cost, I can have the main tubes butted to save 100g.

Here are some larger pics:

https://c9kpjg.sn2.livefilestore.com/y1 ... jpg?psid=1

https://c9kpjg.sn2.livefilestore.com/y1 ... jpg?psid=1

https://c9kpjg.sn2.livefilestore.com/y1 ... jpg?psid=1


Attachments:
IMG_0611B.JPG
IMG_0611B.JPG [ 146.17 KiB | Viewed 4061 times ]
20120501_33d9619156a9a60406b36v7pEERmSTuS.jpg
20120501_33d9619156a9a60406b36v7pEERmSTuS.jpg [ 104.56 KiB | Viewed 4061 times ]
IMG_0611C.JPG
IMG_0611C.JPG [ 128.87 KiB | Viewed 4061 times ]

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 5:07 pm
Posts: 285
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Very nice. How much will it me? Please provide me an approximation if possible.

What has been the hardest thing to overcome in the design process compared to your carbon frame?


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:11 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1227
Location: In the industry
The hardest thing was the seat tube cluster in order to achieve smooth cable routing and strength of the tube. Head tube was painful and expensive to make but I was able to fix that with a semi-integrated upper headset cup, and a fully integrated lower headset cup, which essentially cut my cost in half for the head tube. That's still light years ahead of the INSET so popular these days.

Price for the frame I am trying to keep at an affordable level of $1600. Add headset, fork, and seapost, it's around $2K. Full custom also available.

Sam wrote:
Very nice. How much will it me? Please provide me an approximation if possible.

What has been the hardest thing to overcome in the design process compared to your carbon frame?

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2012 2:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:23 am
Posts: 655
Location: so. cal.
i really like the tubing that you have used on the frame specially on the main triangle. it looks really simpleyet functional with the exception of the rear drop outs. a couple touches of black on the frame would look better along with a completely black fork. the topper is the only part that makes me go "?" but i bet it look great in person. actually now that i think about ita black topper, blck fork and little touche of black on the frame would really look nice. what size is the frame on this particular frame? does the frame weight include the topper? What is the topper weight?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2012 5:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1227
Location: In the industry
I will admit transportation issues with ISPs. Re adjustment, I can make a long topper and a short topper. The long one provides 50mm+ of adjustment, which is a lot.

Let me consider the black comment.

The frame in the pic is a 53 (53.8 top tube and vertically very similar to a 53 Colnago/C'dale, etc.). Frame weight does not include the topper, which, with the carbon cradles pictured, is fairly light (forgot the number but def below 150g).

roca rule wrote:
i really like the tubing that you have used on the frame specially on the main triangle. it looks really simpleyet functional with the exception of the rear drop outs. a couple touches of black on the frame would look better along with a completely black fork. the topper is the only part that makes me go "?" but i bet it look great in person. actually now that i think about ita black topper, blck fork and little touche of black on the frame would really look nice. what size is the frame on this particular frame? does the frame weight include the topper? What is the topper weight?

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2012 9:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 5:07 pm
Posts: 285
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Can you tell us more about the approach regarding the integrationsprocess between different parts of the frame?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 12:28 am 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 3133
Really beautiful work. Elviento - do you get to the Taipei show, or Taichung Bike Week? Perhaps I will see you there. I would love to see these in person.

_________________
http://worksrider.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 1:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 4:40 pm
Posts: 334
Location: Beer City
I must say I love the headtube. I have a Lynskey Cooper, and the one thing that has always kinda bugged me is the headset, it just looks kinda clunky, especially at the junction of the fork, which you seem to have solved perfectly!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 3:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:56 am
Posts: 258
I like it! I have two Titanium bikes (1 Litespeed Road and 1 Dean Mtb). I always liked classic fluid metal lines with just a touch of modernity with compact geometry. This one has it!

I also like that it is not painted. One of the most fascinating colour combos are that of the Titanium greyish/silverish/champaigne metallic sheen over carbon....This one has it again! :-)

_________________
"Light bike? Its still about the engine!".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 4:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1227
Location: In the industry
The head tube has been a major battle between the head engineer and me (we are beer buddies so all is cool).

He is more concerned about manufacturing process and cost limitations, while I am more of the idealist driven by fetish. I wanted a smooth and curvy head tube (think Coke bottle) that would "flow" into the fork. But the cost for CNC'ing such smooth lines into a block of titanium would be ridiculous (it's like building a mould, just into a tougher metal). In fact many "premium" brands are reluctant to depart from straight head tubes, which is why the King Inset rocks for them.

Then we thought about a tapered shaped head tube, but short head tube would look more "tapered" than long ones. So we settled on the bulge at the bottom and consistent diameter above that, good enough to accommodate the tapered fork, and consistent enough in terms of looks and manufacturing.

SAM -- titanium manufacturing has been what it is for many years, people get used to what they believe to be golden rules of ti frame building. I came in with all sorts of ideas and I get blasted by "WTF r u thinking?" comments from the engineer. The end was a compromise.

Originally I was going to run the rear brake cable through the seat tube as well (so 2 "nostrils" at the back of the cluster), but the routing wasn't optimal for the brake cable. So we end up with 1 hole at the back.

The seat tube and topper combination was a bit unusual as well. The topper essentially is butted to save some weight.

RTW -- Taipei is in March, so I have better news for you -- I am coming to Interbike if you have plans to go.

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 6:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 10:38 am
Posts: 414
I like your design sensibilities. Don't trust your head designer if he works for the manufacturing facility. They are governed on their own bottom line, not necessarily yours or your customers.

I really like the routing on the rear shifter. Unique! Have you thought about adapting this design to a standard seatpost? The industry seems to be moving away from seatmast toppers back to the traditional style seatpost.

Good idea on the headtube with the taper on the bottom, but straight continuing afterwards. This should save on manufacturing costs since you don't have to do a taper on the top and bottom of the headtube. I assume this is a 1 1/2" to 1 1/8" tapered fork steerer, correct?

Great proportions on the tubing diameters. What diameters (DT, ST, TT) do you have going on for the bike you have pictured?

Great start. I have a feeling you are going to have a lot of interested future Falco riders soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 5:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:18 pm
Posts: 5
I LOVE this bike. For $1600 its a great deal. keep us posted for when they are for sale


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 8:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 5:46 am
Posts: 225
Beautiful work!

_________________
Riding the Catskills


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 4:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1227
Location: In the industry
Thanks for the kind words.

Non ISP is a bit hard as the seatpost would need to go down the shaft where the cable would be going through. You could have a high enough collar like the BH G5. You could also route the little tube externally, kinda like the plastic cable guide from Shimano/Campy, but only on the cluster rather than below the BB.

It's a 1 1/4 taper, so fairly moderate. The head tube is still machined from a thick pipe, but the looks will be a lot more consistent.

tt is a 40-29mm taper, dt is 45mm, st is 28.6 but can easily be 31.6 if rider weight is on the higher side.

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 4:09 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 10:04 am 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 3133
Can you do me one with S&S couplers, and send me an FOB price! :P

Interbike - I expect I will be there. ISPO Bike (Munich), Eurobike, The Austrian Show, Madrid, Interbike (perhaps) and Taichung Bike Week are all on the calendar!

Rich

_________________
http://worksrider.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jbf, mariosimas, n808, naylor343 and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Time for a New Bike?

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

RyanH

16

1145

Sat Aug 16, 2014 3:19 am

RyanH View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Time Xpresso 12 Titanium Carbon Pedal

in Road

Tillquist

2

665

Fri Feb 28, 2014 7:40 am

Tillquist View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Light bike or stiff bike?

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

in Road

Kermithimself

32

2478

Mon Sep 22, 2014 7:19 pm

06SpiceRed View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Chainring design and interaction with latest 11 speed

in Road

Omiar

5

634

Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:06 am

Zoro View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Rotor Aero Q-rings, is there a new 2014 design?

in Road

ill principe

9

1386

Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:34 am

dominikk View the latest post


It is currently Wed Oct 01, 2014 11:41 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB