Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Wed Jan 24, 2018 12:41 pm

All times are UTC+01:00

Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 6:18 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1235
Location: In the industry
Can I humbly add that CAAD[_] actually never referred to forks?

Tokyo Drifter wrote:
CAAD10s are more durable because of the carbon steerer. The carbon/alloy steerer tube join is a not-uncommon point of failure. They're also a better buy because you would (presumably) be buying them new, and therefore have a warranty.

Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Facebook: falcobikeglobal

Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 6:18 am 

PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 4:48 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 1:09 pm
Posts: 148
Some misleading info in this thread.

Firstly, all alloy frames will suffer fatigue. Back in the early to mid-2000 Pinarello Prince/Dogma were alloy frames with carbon tail. The warranty on those frames was only two years. Cannondale however overbuilt their frames slightly, provided Lifetime warranty, though, even they did mention a harder ridden frame will wear out quicker than a fresh frame.

A C'dale Ultra fork is no less reliable than a full carbon fork. Both forks are bonded at the crown junction, be it carbon or alloy steerer.

Alloy frames don't "soften" over time. Rather the opposite is true.

CAAD7/8/9 are essentially the same frame under the "Optimo" name. The butting of the tubes is all but the same, as are the builds. There are very subtle changes to the models. I'll go into them at later time. Best to get the basics correct here first.

PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2012 6:11 pm 

Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:14 pm
Posts: 25
Location: FL, US
Caad7's, 8's and 9's are all great frames. I have a 3, 8 and 9, all are great. Eventually they will break, like everything.
I wouldn't hesitate buying a 5,6,7 or 9 in good shape. You can always get a new fork if it makes you feel better.

PostPosted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 12:33 pm 

Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:27 pm
Posts: 587
My CAAD 4 world champion edition is currently being converted to my budget TT bike (since I hardly do TT's, I can;t justify paying a huge chunk of money for one of the new superframes.) still going strong despite the paint peeling in most places ( will get around to repainting it soon. and a dent in the top tube caused by transport. it's survived a car impact from the rear ( granted the wheel took the most of the damage) , several crashes, and is still a highly raceable bike. my friend (rides an aluminium giant) borrowed it for a 70km spin the other day and commented how despite it's age it still felt and rode far superior to his aluminium giant. I did change the fork to a new kestrel fork though.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:48 pm 

Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:33 pm
Posts: 4
No idea if they are worth buying or not. Here is my Caad4. Not a crac, dent or anything wrong with this frame :-)


caad44.jpg [ 146.01 KiB | Viewed 1233 times ]
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:11 pm 

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:37 am
Posts: 76
The OP had a good and honest question regarding the different CAAD frames.

Someone who works at a shop and appears to have some knowledge to back up his experience chimes in with some data on his warranty return rate. Data and data compiling btw, that appears to be quite detailed and backed up with very specific failure modes.

A gaggle of I've seen this and have this and that and my CAAD whatever has 900,000 km's and is still working great. Well then, congratulations. Consider yourselves fortunate.

Isn't what we want here is to have our questions answered by others with the experience we seek? This isn't even opinion here. He works at a shop and states factual warranty return rates with details.

Have a modicum of respect here. Just because you have not had a failure on your CAAD 1 does not mean that his warranty return experiences are wrong or inaccurate.
In my opinion, he is going out on a limb a bit. It doesn't make cannondale look good to have so many warranty returns. 34 in the last year is a lot. But it does reflect well on cannondale that they are taking care of all of them with new CAAD 10's.

For those of you with all of those 9 million mile older CAAD's, I'd be inspecting my dropouts regularly.

To suggest that this guy is full of BS and imply that he's a paid poster makes you look like an idiot.

He clearly states that he likes the different series of CAAD models and merely suggests, as others have, to buy the newest you can obtain or afford.

We're talking a difference of a few hundred dollars here between a used CAAD 10 vs something older. The new CAAD 10 is a huge leap in design ahead of the older CAAD's. Hydroformed tubing with more advanced tube shapes, lighter, and in my opinion, a better ride and better built than the USA made frames.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:43 pm 

Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 9:50 pm
Posts: 95
I buy a new bike about every couple of years but my 1997 sub 15lb Cad3 is one of my favorites. Huge Cannondale fan and I have never heard of a cracked frame, Only from a local dealer that sells other brands, he calls them Crack N Fails.

But like I have said. Never seen one fail. I would highly recommend a used Cannondale of any year. They have a certain "snap" to the ride. Plus they build up lighter than most carbon frames and this is weight weenies.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 4:58 pm 

Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2015 4:51 pm
Posts: 3
The thing to remember with these bikes is they have a different geometry. The CAAD 10 shares the same geometry as the Super Six. This is why I built one up. The CAAD 9 is similar in geometry, and is a good race bike.. Really depends on what you're going to do with the bike. My bike is a Billy goat in the hills with it's stiffness and only weighing 13.6 lbs.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 6:34 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 12:52 am
Posts: 513
Location: North Carolina
zensport wrote:
The thing to remember with these bikes is they have a different geometry. The CAAD 10 shares the same geometry as the Super Six.

Actually to be more precise the CAAD10 shares the same goemetry, tube shapes and engineering with the SuperSix EVO. Same group of guys designed both. The SuperSix is just a bit different.

PostPosted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 2:54 am 

Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 10:02 pm
Posts: 85
Get that old CAAD and throw on a modern carbon fork. Drops half a pound and handles better. Love my CAAD9. Especially love that it's BSA - can't stand BB30.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Seven 622 SLX
Colnago C50 Extreme Power
Zanconato CX

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 4:01 am 

Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 9:50 pm
Posts: 95
I have had a few caads over nearly 30 years. Starting with a 2.8 series. Drifted away to carbon many times and always drifted back. I have a few favorites, My 97 R4000 yellow Cad 3, with Sram Red and FSA K Force crank, 14.5 lbs, Love the thing, it just feels like magic to me. I also have a 13.4lb Six13 in raw with Sram Red/FSA K Force/Easton SLX fork bike that I enjoy just as much. I'm looking for a Caad 8 in raw in good shape since I like the all aluminum look.

I have never seen a broken Cannondale aluminum frame in my life. I have seen dozens of carbon frame breaks on Facebook alone posted by friends from weird issues. I know I'm not the only one who has seen this.

I have swapped bike frames 15 times in 30 years. the Cad 3 seems to be staying every time. I guess that says a lot and I didn't plan it that way. BTW the paint is Dupont Imron, it never seems to age, scratch or dull

I would say at the least buy one and have fun. With aluminum you will get a warning that the frame is failing and most likely it can get you home. Carbon seems to explode when it fails

PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 3:28 pm 

Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:12 pm
Posts: 116
Location: Chicago, IL USA
I have a CAAD 9 BB30 that was purchased as a group buy herein what, 08 or 09?

Built it up with 10sp Campy and did some crits on it. Took a couple years off of riding with work and new kids.

Thought I would treat myself to a new frame set. Maybe a Cervelo R3 or even some custom Ti.

Then I rode the "old" CAAD9 again. Fit is perfect. Rides as well as I could ask for and comfortable on 25's.

In desperate moments, on the rivet, opening up my giant suitcase of courage, definitely not a climber but a big strong man..

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Travel with Tacx Neo Smart

in Road




Tue Aug 29, 2017 9:35 pm

MayhemSWE View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Older Quarq BB30 - still worth it?

in Road




Fri May 12, 2017 9:46 pm

simoncx View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Which is more accurate, generally, smart trainers or crank based power meters?

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road




Mon Mar 27, 2017 12:38 am

HakeemT View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Noisy Older Hollowgram crankset and 10s Campy Record Driveline

in Road




Tue Oct 10, 2017 4:52 am

M2G View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Is carbon lugged dead? Have modern monocoque frames usurped carbon lugged frames outside of just weight?

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road




Sat Jul 22, 2017 4:14 pm

spartacus View the latest post

All times are UTC+01:00

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bobones, Bondurant and 25 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited