HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 8:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:56 pm
Posts: 519
Location: Canada
I have both, and for some reason (perhaps psychological only), I find the 303 Firecrest CC's feel "faster". The 404's have Conti 23 mm Grand Prix 4000SR's, glued with Vittoria mastic as per best practice according to the tubular thread.
The 303's have Conti 23mm Grand Prix 4000R's with Conti ultralite butyl tubes.

Weight of the 404's all in including zipp ti skewers : 2120 gms
Weight of the 303's all in including zipp ss skewers: 2420 gms

But.......I carry a spare tubbie plus a can of pitstop when I ride the 404's :weight 350 gms. When I ride the 303's I use a small seat bag (Lezyne) with a spare tube : weight 170 gms. I did not include Co2 inflators etc, since I carry that stuff for both.

So, the weight advantage of the 404's drops to 120 gms.

One more thing. I think that the Crr for the clinchers is much lower than the tubbies (I know.....not a fair fight since I'm using relatively high Crr tubbies.....but I don't like punctures, etc.). My guess is that the Crr advantage of the clinchers more than makes up for the slight weight advantage of the tubbies.

There have already been discussions that indicate that the new 303's and 404's are quite close aerodynamically until you get to greater than 15 deg yaw.

Comments?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 10:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 2:19 pm
Posts: 613
side wind issues?

bearing or hub issues?

tires make a huge difference in how a bike feels as well. and the gap between clinchers and tubes is getting smaller all the time. That is probably the majority of the difference you feel.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 10:52 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 2:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:55 pm
Posts: 46
I don't think "feel" is a very good metric for comparing wheels. CRR, aerodynamics, 100g weight differences, etc. are all important, but whether you can feel these differences at the saddle is questionable.

For example. I run my clinchers at about 115psi. However I've heard that a lower pressure (around 95-105) could actually lead to a lower crr. However, I "feel" much faster when I have a high pressure in my tires.

My guess is that the clinchers are probably faster, but the difference in feel is just tubular being more comfortable.


Last edited by Lou3000 on Thu May 10, 2012 3:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 2:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:56 pm
Posts: 519
Location: Canada
I absolutely agree that "feel" is a lousy indicator of performance, and in fact a great feeling wheel could easily be a worse performer than the not so good feeling wheel. Perhaps I should have changed the question of my original post. I used to be a tubbie advocate, for the feel, performance, etc. But based on numbers and very little if any weight advantage, and as an added bonus "feel", I am now swinging over to admitting that in the case of the two wheels I've compared, the clinchers are better than the tubbies.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: beanbiken, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], itsacarr, kulcha, NoInterVention, rbrtwyn, sedluk and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 202 Firecrest

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

Sparks

24

4939

Thu Jan 02, 2014 3:46 pm

Elrey View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Parlee Z3 and Zipp 303 Firecrest?

in Road

boots2000

4

959

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:58 pm

ryan0380 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Zipp 404 Firecrest Wheels

in Road

kdogg32

0

542

Fri May 16, 2014 7:47 pm

kdogg32 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Reynolds attack or zipp 202 firecrest

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

in Road

GregSherwin

39

2786

Thu May 08, 2014 7:06 am

mattyNor View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Roval Rapide CLX 40 vs Zipp Firecrest 303 Clincher

in Road

LoggingMiles

11

6155

Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:17 am

carbonLORD View the latest post


It is currently Thu Aug 28, 2014 3:26 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB