HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 8:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:31 pm
Posts: 359
Having narrowed my search to these two

Dura Ace C35 and Zipp 101 which would you go for?

I am testing a set of C35 next week and have heard good things about both sets of wheels. Both appeal. I like the idea of a wider tyre in the Zipp wheels. Both meet the criteria I am looking for. Strong, fast. Weight not an issue as a clyde myself and both have good rider weight reports. No decision made, just wondered what others might go for based on what you do or don't like.

Thanks again.

D.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 8:38 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 4:37 pm
Posts: 1335
C35 :thumbup:

_________________
"Smart may have the answers, but stupid have all the interesting questions."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:26 am
Posts: 1735
Location: Atlanta, GA, US
C35, no question. Great hubs (I have the C50 tubulars, and a pair if Ambrosio Nemesis laced to DA hubs), and a overall very nice wheelset by all reports. I am also not sure about the durability of the Zipp 101 for a clyde.

_________________
My Bikes

My Photoblog


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Posts: 3314
Location: Athens, Greece
C35 by far

_________________
My 6530gr Wilier Cento Uno
My 8618gr Colnago Master X-light


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 10:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 8:47 pm
Posts: 879
Location: durp durp durp
Why not build some alpha 340s around the hub of your choice?

You would have a more long term wheel going that route with a easily replaceable rim (at less cost) should it wear out or get crashed.

Even with alchemy or tune hubs the cost would be > than 101's / c35s and the ride quality will be similar / equal imo.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 10:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:22 pm
Posts: 261
mr_tim wrote:
Why not build some alpha 340s around the hub of your choice?

You would have a more long term wheel going that route with a easily replaceable rim (at less cost) should it wear out or get crashed.

Even with alchemy or tune hubs the cost would be > than 101's / c35s and the ride quality will be similar / equal imo.


greater than?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 2:34 pm
Posts: 451
Location: New Zero Kanada 43° 40' 0" N, 79° 25' 0" W
Has anyone here ridden the Zipp 101s for any length of time? I have. They're super fast wheels. The front is fantastic and the rear is good (stupid radial drive spokes seem to let the wheel wind up a bit on slow high torque stuff). The hubs are very nice that the build quality solid. Shimanos are underrated wheels all around, and are very versatile: good at everything. Either one of thee wheels will be great, so just decide what qualities you're biased towards and your decision is made.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:10 am
Posts: 1842
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Check out this for some measured data on the C35s and the 101s
http://www.tour-qtr.com/epaper_4_2011

If you are a clyde, more spokes the better. But depending on how stiff and durable you want these wheels its your call in the end. Mind you you aren't a real clyde until you are over 100kg, >80kg you are bigger than average, below 80kg don't complain!

_________________
http://www.blingmybike.com.au - Shiny light weight bike parts


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:03 pm
Posts: 2010
Location: San Francisco Peninsula
I'd get the Zipp 101. Slightly lighter, less expensive and I'm intrigued by the wider profile of the rim.

_________________
2013 Wilier Cento1 SR || 2009 Ridley Crossbow || 2011 Yeti AS-R 5 Carbon


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:31 pm
Posts: 359
Phill P wrote:
Check out this for some measured data on the C35s and the 101s
http://www.tour-qtr.com/epaper_4_2011

If you are a clyde, more spokes the better. But depending on how stiff and durable you want these wheels its your call in the end. Mind you you aren't a real clyde until you are over 100kg, >80kg you are bigger than average, below 80kg don't complain!


A good read concluded with what we all knew that the Wheelsets I am considering are great, not remarkable, but more than enough for me. Both support a small clyde according to the replies I have had from both companies. I think I would be hard pressed to notice a difference on either given my skillset, but its one or the other. Test riding the C35's tomorrow or Tuesday. As jmilliron says the wider profile sounds cool and could run 23/24/25mm I would imagine. Thanks again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:40 pm
Posts: 316
Location: CA
101 user chiming in here. Have about 4k miles on these wheels and I really like them. I have not tried the C35 wheels so I can't compare, however. I like running a wider 24-25mm tire and the Zipps seem to work well for this. The 88/188 hubs spin nice. I weigh 145lbs and the 101s have been really durable and not needed a true yet. I ride some rough roads with a fair amount of gravel/dirt in the mix. My only complaint is the wheels are on the heavy side and maybe a little pricey for an alloy set. That said, the 101s are definitely fast and nearly the perfect training set for me. Wide, durable, aero, in an aluminum rim that I'm not worried about riding hard.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:31 pm
Posts: 359
Thanks.

I have thrown HED Ardenne into the ring now, another unremarkable but stand up wheel set.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 6:11 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 12:00 pm
Posts: 566
Location: Aarhus, Denmark
If i remember correctly. The Ardennes have a shallower rim right? Why not consider the c24s aswell?

These are the ones i am currently leaning towards in a quest similar to yours.

_________________
"Stay cool and try to survive" A. Klier to the other members of the Garmin classics squad the night before P-R.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 3310
Location: Natovi Landing
Of the two C35s, though I'd rather get C24s and put the balance towards some tubs.

Have C24s and 202s - which are kind of a tub version of the 101s. All these wheels are good, but C35 clinchers and 101s are overpriced IMO.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:31 pm
Posts: 359
Kastrup wrote:
If i remember correctly. The Ardennes have a shallower rim right? Why not consider the c24s aswell?

These are the ones i am currently leaning towards in a quest similar to yours.


Yes, on the list too. It is not that hard a decision, but it is made harder by my decision to move away from deep section tubular wheels for good as changing my outlook and riding based on certain factors. I have two bikes and more than likely buy a set of something for the 'best bike' and something else for the other in time. The one thing holding me back from a purchase now is this issue with the wider rim thus helping rolling resistance which of course is what we like about tub. That said, I ride my single speed daily with cheap clincher wheels and never do I think or indeed feel like I am riding on the centre of the tyre so perhaps I am thinking too hard - which in turn goes back to the whole moving deep section on due to ill health. It is a strange paradox.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 7:26 pm 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Mattias Hellöre, Method01, Permon, Sjoerd, SkippyMcJimmelstein, weekapaugin and 57 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Choosing 2009 Dura Ace C50, Token T50 and Zipp 404?

in Road

rrm

8

763

Fri Oct 04, 2013 8:48 pm

mrlobber View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Dura Ace 9000 changes to 9001

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]

in Road

NYCPrynne

65

18956

Fri Mar 14, 2014 5:58 pm

Grill View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. DURA ACE 9000 OR ROTOR

in Road

treetrees

10

2504

Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:10 am

maquisard View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Does dura ace 11 speed crankset come with bb?

in Road

critracer26

3

368

Tue Apr 29, 2014 7:46 am

beanbiken View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Upgrading to dura-ace 7900 di2

in Road

fancycoconut

3

342

Tue Apr 22, 2014 3:48 pm

fancycoconut View the latest post


It is currently Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:00 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB