Stem tightening
Moderator: robbosmans
So my bars were clicking when I pulled on them going uphill (a recurring theme I think). Took them off, applied carbon paste, torqued them just right, etc. Still clicking.
Next, check the stem. As I took it off I discovered that the guy who had assembled it had not tightened it very much. I pasted it and torqued it to spec (which seems to have cured the clicking noise) but am now in doubt. Because of the gap between the top of the steerer and the top of the stem (to allow for the cap) the stem gets more compressed at the top than at the bottom, and requires more turns to get to the right torque.
So do I:
Just torque both bolts to spec?
Torque the bottom one to spec and maintain the same gap at the top of the stem?
As a side I noticed as I was tightening the stem bolts the exact same clicking sound that I previously had when pulling on the bars - anything to worry about?
Thanks!
Next, check the stem. As I took it off I discovered that the guy who had assembled it had not tightened it very much. I pasted it and torqued it to spec (which seems to have cured the clicking noise) but am now in doubt. Because of the gap between the top of the steerer and the top of the stem (to allow for the cap) the stem gets more compressed at the top than at the bottom, and requires more turns to get to the right torque.
So do I:
Just torque both bolts to spec?
Torque the bottom one to spec and maintain the same gap at the top of the stem?
As a side I noticed as I was tightening the stem bolts the exact same clicking sound that I previously had when pulling on the bars - anything to worry about?
Thanks!
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
-
- Posts: 560
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:58 pm
- Location: Wet coast, Canada
Ideally, the best solution is to have a 5 or 10 mm spacer above the stem. The top of the fork would sit 2-3 mm below the spacer. That way the fork will pass through the entire section of the stem and clamping forces will not compress the end of the steerer. If you have a stem with a low rise you might be able to achieve this by using a stem with more rise and moving a spacer from below the stem to above.
-
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:26 am
- Location: California's country side
I lubricate the threads and the bottom of the bolt heads so they can reach a torque and (hopefully) unaffected by binding or friction. alternate so tighten to 4nm each, then 4.5nm, then 5nm
Never had a problem even though sometimes the gap is not EXACTLY even top to bottom.
Only had problem after going to LBS and they do me a favor by tightening my carbon stem to 6nm and I found a crack after I go home, that explain why they handed it back to me in a hurry.
Never had a problem even though sometimes the gap is not EXACTLY even top to bottom.
Only had problem after going to LBS and they do me a favor by tightening my carbon stem to 6nm and I found a crack after I go home, that explain why they handed it back to me in a hurry.
- btompkins0112
- Posts: 2635
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:04 am
- Location: Mississippi
Bigger Gear wrote:Ideally, the best solution is to have a 5 or 10 mm spacer above the stem. The top of the fork would sit 2-3 mm below the spacer. That way the fork will pass through the entire section of the stem and clamping forces will not compress the end of the steerer. If you have a stem with a low rise you might be able to achieve this by using a stem with more rise and moving a spacer from below the stem to above.
Or using a bung like the KCNC unit that has a larger surface area that extends from the top of the steerer and through the bottom of the stem, allowing for equal tightening force across the claming area.
Mosaic RS-1
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=138478
Cielo by Chris King Cross Racer
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=134376
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=138478
Cielo by Chris King Cross Racer
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=134376
Regret wrote:...if I do that only one of the bolts will be torqued to spec.
No, I don't think so. You should not tighten one bolt completely, first, if you start with both bolts fully open and get them 'close' with a conventional Allen key, you can switch the torque wrench back and forth between the two bolts until they are both to spec. Assuming you have the steerer cut properly (with enough 'room' at the top) a good topcap for carbon steerers, you should be fine.
PoorCyclist wrote:I lubricate the threads and the bottom of the bolt heads so they can reach a torque and (hopefully) unaffected by binding or friction. alternate so tighten to 4nm each, then 4.5nm, then 5nm
.
Lubing the threads and heads is actually a no-no.
The proper torque-stress relationships are almost always figured using NON-lubricated threads and heads. Loctite and anti-seize compounds are very mild lubricants and are acceptable on threads.
If you lube the thread and head, then the stress in the bolt becomes a lot higher for a given torque. You risk breaking bolts and/or parts.
Alternating, gradually increasing tightening is good though.
I wonder if the OP has a compression bung inside the steerer that is snugged up correctly to support the ID of the steerer ?
Minus the lubrication, here is the procedure you should be doing (as others have described):
http://www.woodcousa.com/bolt-sequence-index.htm
I would not do a circular pattern. I would do something like top to bottom on left and then top to bottom on right (repeat). You do not want to start out tightening both tops and then both bottoms.
http://www.woodcousa.com/bolt-sequence-index.htm
I would not do a circular pattern. I would do something like top to bottom on left and then top to bottom on right (repeat). You do not want to start out tightening both tops and then both bottoms.
-
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:26 am
- Location: California's country side
I use antiseize on Ti bolts, but I usually under torque them to 5nm if it says 6nm max.
just a little film of grease to avoid the head digging into the face plate or bind, e.g. when the beam of the torque wrench moved but the bolt didn't.. things like that.
So for the OP you want to check the gaps is somewhat even before you start (I use a 2mm hex key or something small).. apply same number of quarter turns alternatively to each bolt and finish with the torque wrench, ready to ride... don't think people bother to measure the final gap, do we?
just a little film of grease to avoid the head digging into the face plate or bind, e.g. when the beam of the torque wrench moved but the bolt didn't.. things like that.
So for the OP you want to check the gaps is somewhat even before you start (I use a 2mm hex key or something small).. apply same number of quarter turns alternatively to each bolt and finish with the torque wrench, ready to ride... don't think people bother to measure the final gap, do we?
Wow, thanks for all the answers.
Due to my less than hypermobile physique I need as many spacers under and as few spacers over the handlebar as possible.
The gaps start the same but the gap at the top is markedly smaller than the one at the bottom after careful alternate tightening.
Regret wrote:Ideally, the best solution is to have a 5 or 10 mm spacer above the stem. The top of the fork would sit 2-3 mm below the spacer. That way the fork will pass through the entire section of the stem and clamping forces will not compress the end of the steerer. If you have a stem with a low rise you might be able to achieve this by using a stem with more rise and moving a spacer from below the stem to above.
Due to my less than hypermobile physique I need as many spacers under and as few spacers over the handlebar as possible.
checked this on KCNC's homepage - looks like a good idea but I can't see how it will fit down the steerer tube on my Colnago EPS, there is no shim or anything that kan be removed - or have I misunderstood how it works?PoorCyclist wrote:Or using a bung like the KCNC unit that has a larger surface area that extends from the top of the steerer and through the bottom of the stem, allowing for equal tightening force across the claming area.
this is quite surprising to me - I have always had it pounded into me that you must never use dry bolts on a bicycle.Geoff wrote:Lubing the threads and heads is actually a no-no.
Arky wrote:So for the OP you want to check the gaps is somewhat even before you start (I use a 2mm hex key or something small).. apply same number of quarter turns alternatively to each bolt and finish with the torque wrench, ready to ride... don't think people bother to measure the final gap, do we?
The gaps start the same but the gap at the top is markedly smaller than the one at the bottom after careful alternate tightening.
I had the EXACT same problem. Turns out my problem was the headset. A year's worth of no service and it was filthy. I cleaned it up best I could and reassembled everything. Dead silent bike. Unfortunately the creak soon returned so it appears that my headset probably needs replacing. FWIW, I am running a full carbon, tapered (1.125 to 1.5) steerer with integrated steerer.
How I hated threaded steerers but this has been driving me mad!
How I hated threaded steerers but this has been driving me mad!
Regret wrote:Geoff wrote:
Lubing the threads and heads is actually a no-no.
this is quite surprising to me - I have always had it pounded into me that you must never use dry bolts on a bicycle.
@Regret, that quotation was mistakenly attributed to me. I do not personally agree with that statement and believe that the stem bolts for both the steerer and the faceplate should be lightly greased on the threads and the heads.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com