HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:41 am
Posts: 344
Location: FINLAND
Fourthbook wrote:
Seems like a brake mounted under the BB would be a nightmare in sloppy conditions. Won't it pick up more mud, etc. there? I also wonder how the lack of a brake bridge between the rear seat stays affects frame rigidity, especially when sprinting - flexing the frame from side to side.

+1 on the ugly headtube shape...


I agree the chainstay mounted brake for mud picker, but I can see no difference in rigidity cause seatstays are already very thin. Chainstays are more rigid and these direct mount brakes need VERY rigid construction because they push chainstays outward. When I have these type of brakes in my MTB about 25 years ago, we have to put U shape stiffener (booster) to prevent this (flexing) problem...

_________________
Team KAS-RAK: http://www.pellossalo.fi/pellossalonnousu/
My Look 695 SR + EPS : http://www.pellossalo.fi/content/uploads/images/medium/Look695EPS.jpg
http://www.pellossalo.fi/content/uploads/images/medium/20120513_003.jpg


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:21 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:31 pm
Posts: 986
Mountain Bike manufacturers worked out that was a stupid idea decades ago.

Change for change's sake is such a waste of human endeavor.

Looking forward to someone attacking Schleck when he get's a piece of debris stuck in there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:04 am
Posts: 2348
Location: Mississippi
airwise wrote:
Looking forward to someone attacking Schleck when he get's a piece of debris stuck in there.


maybe they did it so he would have an excuse for sucking.... :smartass: :noidea:

_________________
Cervelo R3

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=125962


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: New Madone for the Tour?
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 10:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm
Posts: 1258
djwalker wrote:
What a horrible place to put the brake- directly in the path of all the garbage kicked up by the front wheel. This would really suck in bad weather. And accessibility for maintenance is horrible.

+1!

_________________
My Colnago C59
My Special Colnago EPQ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 10:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 6:24 pm
Posts: 4389
Location: BELGIUM
Looks neat when spic & span clean but seriously, it's a nightmare for in-race conditions. A racer himself or a mechanic in the car should always be able to adjust the brake while riding, especially the rear one. Okay, it could be done, risking losing a couple fingers trying.. This stuff is getting to the point of ridiculous for bikes designed for road racing (non TT).

The bike looks good though. ha.

_________________
Latest ride - Bianchi Infinito CV


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 11:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:16 pm
Posts: 617
cable routing around the cable clamp bolt looks terrible, why bend it around so it sticks back in to the caliper


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:23 am
Posts: 655
Location: so. cal.
so we got
ugly head tube
non ideal location for brakes
cable routing
and above all it is a trek.
just kidding i am sure trek might make some other changes before it releases to the general public.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:16 pm
Posts: 617
hope so its not quite bad enough to be called a trek yet :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 1:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 6:23 am
Posts: 642
Location: Melbourne, Australia
A Cannondale Evo is (probably) more aero only by the virtue of using smaller tubing...

_________________
Slam your stem.
prendrefeu wrote:
Hating a 'drivetrain' choice on one bike vs. another is as imbecile as people getting into fist-fights at a motor race that they are not actually racing in Australia over a debate between two car companies. It really is ridiculous.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 3:49 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Posts: 7558
Location: Geeeelong!
strobbekoen wrote:
Okay, it could be done, risking losing a couple fingers trying..

Part of me hopes we see it during the Dauphine or the Tour...


strobbekoen wrote:
The bike looks good though. ha.

Grudgingly have to agree :lol:


And Carey, not a single credit to WW for the heads up? :(

_________________
http://www.nicksquillari.com.au Forum Jedi


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 4:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1227
Location: In the industry
I agree the HT/fork junction is ugly, but I'm sure the numbers will shine.

The typical "flow" from HT to fork results in a "disjointed" fork from steerer to the crown, and uneven stiffness numbers in the steerer and the crown.

Storck said "f**k that". Now so does Trek. I say kudos for the courage.



jmilliron wrote:
Frame looks cool. Seat stays without the brake bridge look interesting. Wonder if that changes ride quality and power transfer?

Dislike the flow from the HT to the fork though. Disjointed.

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 3180
Location: New Zealand
Perhaps with the DI2 battery down there already (splitting the air from the frame already) it became the best place to put it (aerodynamically). It looks nice :)

_________________
Used to race....got too wrinkly and old ;) Updated: Racing again! Thought this was unlikely! Eventually, I may even have a decent race!
Edit: HAD a decent race! 16/08/2014 :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:08 pm
Posts: 194
Tinea Pedis wrote:
Grudgingly have to agree :lol:


And Carey, not a single credit to WW for the heads up? :(


Ha, no, sorry, this was on my list long before WW brought it up. It's been on the UCI list since April. But WW was still the first I saw it mentioned anywhere else :thumbup:

_________________
VeloNews Magazine/VeloNews.com tech
Contact always welcome - http://velonews.competitor.com/author/cfretz / cfretz at competitorgroup dot com.
Twitter: @CaleyFretz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:37 am
Posts: 1
From a practical point of view, and since most of us can't afford a Domane for the classics/crappy conditions & the new Madone for fine days, putting the rear brake underneath the BB isn't exactly the greatest move for the reasons highlighted above. It'll also lead to rapid wear of the pads.

Can you imagine us riding in the deep winter, or doing the Tour of Flanders / Paris-Roubaix sportives on the new Madone?! Ha.

I'm keen to know if this will be an addition to their new ''Aero'' line in the same way as Specalized's Venge/SL4, while still retaining the 6.9 SSL?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Posts: 1524
Location: Houston, Texas
Tinea Pedis wrote:
strobbekoen wrote:
Okay, it could be done, risking losing a couple fingers trying..

Part of me hopes we see it during the Dauphine or the Tour...

While I agree that road debris may be an issue, for brake adjustments, from this image I got the impression that there is an inline cable adjuster on the brake cable up front thus no need for the rider to hang onto the team car while mecahnic adjusts the brakes.

_________________
Michael - The Anaerobic Threshold is neither...


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:51 pm 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], CedrickG, djconnel, normcorriveau, tallicaboy and 50 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. 09 Madone Sizing Question

in Road

CamMancuso

4

394

Sun Dec 01, 2013 7:43 pm

CamMancuso View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Trek Madone vs Domane

in Road

benhama

6

3024

Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:27 pm

benhama View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Stiffer fork for Madone 6.9?

in Road

cheaterbike

1

750

Sat Jan 18, 2014 11:25 am

DMF View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. new bike help - Cervelo S3 vs R3 vs Madone vs ??

in Road

tacostand

11

1514

Fri Jun 13, 2014 9:31 am

kervelo View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Hey, I'm New. Madone Frame Upgrade Question...

in Road

Vicelord

7

727

Mon Jul 07, 2014 6:13 pm

pje0713 View the latest post


It is currently Sat Aug 30, 2014 4:04 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB