Page 1 of 1
Cannondale Hollowgram Quarq weight?? vs SRM??
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:30 pm
by Scooter
Hey guys haven't been on here in forever!
Currently working on a Cannondale Evo build with Super Record and debating the swap to a Quarq. I have a wired SRM still
works great but want wireless. Anyway anyone weighted a Quarq vs SRM spider? From there sites it appears the Quarq is lighter. I'm planning on sticking with the Cannondale rings.
Thanks in advance
Cannondale Hollowgram Quarq weight?? vs SRM??
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:30 pm
by Weenie
Visit
starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
Re: Cannondale Hollowgram Quarq weight?? vs SRM??
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:11 pm
by mortirollover
SRM spider is around 30 g heavier than the Quarq.
Re: Cannondale Hollowgram Quarq weight?? vs SRM??
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:46 pm
by Scooter
mortirollover wrote:SRM spider is around 30 g heavier than the Quarq.
I guess that kinda raises the next question of weight of Garmin 500 vs. the SRM head unit too? w/ sensors?
Re: Cannondale Hollowgram Quarq weight?? vs SRM??
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:13 am
by kbzoo
The SRM PC7 with mount is 82g and the fork mounted speed sensor is 16g.
The Garmin 500 with mount is 65g. I don't have a weight for the additional Garmin cadence/speed sensor at this moment but I can find out when I get back home later.
Re: Cannondale Hollowgram Quarq weight?? vs SRM??
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:56 pm
by Geoff
Wireless is great, but it is hard to beat the reliability and accuracy of the Si SRM. If it ain't broke...