HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:25 pm
Posts: 313
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia / The Hague, Holland
Is this a thread from the 90's that's been revived? :noidea:

_________________
2010 Guerciotti Whisper
2007 Bianchi 928L (update Sep '11)
1999 Bianchi MegaPro 25CrMo4


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:51 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 2:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:36 am
Posts: 1048
Location: UK
I thought the OP was referring to the sloping tt of some bikes seem to be getting steeper.
The new Giants appear to be steeper. The problem is they look OK in the smaller sizes whereas the bigger models look like kids bikes. Bigger frames look much better with a more gradual slope.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 2:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 4:33 am
Posts: 10
I also think the sloping top tubes make it easier to fit bikes to less athletic riders. With a sloping tube the height of the bars in relationship to the seat are generally higher, creating a more relaxed fit without resorting to high rise stems or a large stack of washers under the stem on a long steerer tube. The tall head tube of my 54 cm Orbea (53.5 top tube) places the bars much higher than the small head tube of my 49 cm Ciocc (52.5 top tube), even with the stem of my Orbea slammed and my Cinelli as high as it can reach. Yes, the Orbea is a slightly larger size, but the bar is 4-5 cm higher.

Just my two cents...

_________________
1984 Ciocc Aquila 84 - SLX frame and full Campy Super Record
2006 Orbea Lobular - Aluminum and Carbon frame with Ultegra


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 2:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:25 am
Posts: 711
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
You can swing your 'nads over more easily if the top tube is lower.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 2:54 am 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1951
Location: NoVA/DC
a sloping "compact" geometry bike does not necessarily have a taller head tube. the two features are mutually exclusive.
the general benefit of a sloping top tube is that it takes standover height completely out of the fit equation. with traditional geometry bikes, if someone comes in with proportionally short legs and long torso, the ideal "reach" of bike will be too tall for him. there would be no standover clearance. if that person went down in size, the reach of the bike would be too short. a sloping top tube addresses that very well.
i definitely think giant got it very wrong in the beginning. specialized did it well, cannondale with their 2cm top tube drop is a nice middle ground.
as for lateral/torsional stiffness, overall i dont think it makes too much of a difference one way or the other, but i do believe it's easier to build in vertical compliance for a given lateral stiffness, especially with seatpost flex.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 3:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2007 5:02 pm
Posts: 642
For old welded, fillet-brazed and otherwise put together from pieces of tubing
frames it didn't matter but for carbon it make sense to have a continuous
undisturbed strand of fiber from TT to seatstays - is that the reason too?

Anyway, I hate short top tubes and tall head tubes that came with this fashion
and people are using spacers, up-sloping stems and non-offset seatposts
along with already relax geometry. Heresy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 4:27 pm
Posts: 97
I think for larger sloping geometry frames the headtubes are in fact shorter than those found on traditional geometry ones. Even on an ultra `relaxed' fit Specialized Secteur in size XL I can set it up with a saddle/handlebar drop of 10cms just by removing the spacers, I could get to 12cms+ with a change of stem. So maybe the long headtube issue is only found on the smaller frames?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:16 pm
Posts: 617
stack height is not affected by sloping tope tube, if its longer or shorter its because they wanted to make it that way not because they had to beacuse of the sloping TT.

sloping may or may not be stiffer but because of the longer seat tube needed it make the whole package more flexiable, long eat tubes especially 'aero' ones flex alot


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 7:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 10:38 am
Posts: 413
As you can see, nobody knows WTF the original poster is talking about. It's like asking, "What's up with bikes these days?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 4:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 7:19 pm
Posts: 203
All I'm asking is whether there was a functional reason for the sloping geometry on the new road bikes, or whether it was just an aesthetic move. In my opinion, my question was answered.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm
Posts: 1134
phourgenres wrote:
All I'm asking is whether there was a functional reason for the sloping geometry on the new road bikes, or whether it was just an aesthetic move. In my opinion, my question was answered.

Not functional. Not aesthetic. Strictly business. Fewer frame sizes to fit more people. Less costs of manufacturing. More profits.

_________________
My Colnago C59
My Special Colnago EPQ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 1:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 11:42 pm
Posts: 3913
Location: lat 38.9677 lon 77.3366
I have a slightly sloping top tube on my custom frame (2degrees). My reason was simply to have enough seat post showing so I could clamp it in the bike stand. Works for me.

GT had that rear triangle thing going on some years back. It had the seat stays attached lower on the seat tube and was marketed as giving a stiffer rear triangle. All they needed to do was slope the top tube. Giant has often said that sloping top tubes came about to reduce the number of molds to three, small, medium and large. Some riders like to squat on the sloping top tube to get more aero.

It has become a trademark for comfort fit bikes as it hides the really long head tube you would otherwise see. Look at the saddle vs stem hight. Many of these bikes have the bars almost level with the seat. Lets you "look" faster :roll:

_________________
WW Velocipedist Gargantuan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 2:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 2:25 pm
Posts: 280
Location: Aloha, Oregon
Valbrona wrote:
You can swing your 'nads over more easily if the top tube is lower.


For a guy that rides a 50cm bike sloping is always welcome at 5'5"

_________________
Let's finish the ride with a 20% grade.

2011 Scott Addict R1 DA 7900 Matt black

2013 Cannondale EVO Hi mod DA 9000


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bonefish, em3, Google [Bot], keong72, tigoose, Yahoo [Bot] and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. New aero test: 12 aero frames vs 12 "unaero" light frames

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]

in Road

fa63

69

6831

Fri Feb 28, 2014 9:42 pm

DMF View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cervelo R3 geometry...

in Road

Powerful Pete

11

1656

Mon Aug 12, 2013 12:48 am

Powerful Pete View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cannondale and Specialized geometry help

in Road

digiadaamore

4

657

Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:00 pm

Boralb View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Help understand geometry reach and stack

in Road

blantonator

5

731

Wed Oct 30, 2013 7:55 am

cyclenutnz View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Body Geometry or Guru Experience

in Road

rheosibal

6

887

Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:10 pm

emorydptt View the latest post


It is currently Sat Apr 19, 2014 5:57 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB