HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:09 pm
Posts: 39
Okay I hear you guys on here say that aero trumps weight everytime except uphill TTs. Heres my question I hope you guys can make the right decision on wheels for a race this weekend.

I have a flat 50 mile road race in florida on saturday. Its a 14 mile loop no hills with the exception of a gradual up hill finish. it has maybe 6 turns total. I am 5'7" 149 lbs. I have normally race the American Classic 420 aeros which are pushing 1530 grams but have the oppurtunity to race some zipp 404 aluminum/carbon clinchers. The bike weight with the: 420 aeros weight 16lbs 08 ozs
zipp 404s weight 16lbs 13 ozs

the amount of aero advantage of the: zipp 404 58mm depth
420 aeros 34mm depth

Is the zipps the right choice or should I be leaning to the faster spin up of the 420s. I am on the fence. Thanx for any data or insight you might be able to get me.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:42 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:46 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1969
Location: NoVA/DC
go with the 404s. the weight difference will save maybe one second TOTAL in acceleration advantage. the 404 is a proven aero advantage.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 8:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:09 pm
Posts: 39
So even with the weight and spin up difference your saying their is a significant aeroadvantage to the 404s over the 420s that will more than offset the weight and spinup? Do you think the spin up difference is much different?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 8:09 pm 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1969
Location: NoVA/DC
i think the spin up difference would save almost nothing. hence, my guesstimation of 1 second savings total.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 8:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:25 am
Posts: 850
Location: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
The maths say that about 80% of the effort on a bike is spent pushing air out of the way, and deep section aero wheels are timesavers. But what us cyclists actually know is that in racing you are mostly riding in someone's slipstream, ie. in the dirty air from the guys in front, and do not encounter a smooth air flow unless you are on/off the front. And there are things called sidewinds.

All said, for a short flat race I would go 404's. And 50 miles ... is that a serious race?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 8:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:09 pm
Posts: 39
Valbrona wrote:

All said, for a short flat race I would go 404's. And 50 miles ... is that a serious race?


Because our Cat4 road race is combined with the Cat 5. its a omnium weekend. Whereas in 2 weeks the Cat 4 road race will be 72 miles. Been racing cat 4 for about 5 weeks and I'm halfway already to my cat 3 upgrade. I cant wait to get to the 80-100 mile races


so you also agree that 404s are a way better option than the 420s for a flat road race.


Last edited by JAX11 on Thu Mar 01, 2012 8:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 8:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:28 pm
Posts: 1404
I've never bought the inertia theory's. At flat road race and criterium speeds aerodynamics will help you accelerate much more than those 200+/- grams weight savings.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 8:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:26 pm
Posts: 251
Location: Norway
Some seem to forget that weight isn't the only factor in accelerations. Aerodynamics also play a huge role in how easy you will gain speed after a turn as you still need to beat the wind.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 8:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:09 pm
Posts: 39
Awesome. Thanx for all the responses. I am getting ready to purchase zipp 303 firecrest carbon tubulars soon, but sounds like these 404 aluminum/carbon clinchers will work for now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 9:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:43 am
Posts: 237
404's all the way.

_________________
Cervélo S2 2012 Red
Great minds think alike... sadly, so do the mediocre ones.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 9:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:14 am
Posts: 1223
Location: by Crystal Springs (Sawyer Creek Trail)
Absolutely 404 will CRUSH the 420s on a course like this. Hell, you could get Lightweight Obermeyers and the 404s would crush them here


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:15 pm
Posts: 177
How you attach your race number will matter more than having aero wheels.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:28 pm
Posts: 1404
Even still, aero wheels will make you faster.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:14 am
Posts: 1223
Location: by Crystal Springs (Sawyer Creek Trail)
2011 wrote:
How you attach your race number will matter more than having aero wheels.


Sorry, but I call bullsh!t on that one


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:09 pm
Posts: 39
It must be the anti placebo effect I take these out on the road and they feel sluggish. Is it just my mind knowing there heavier and bulkier. Maybe i should put a different tire on there. right now there is continental gp4000 that are 2 years old the guy says. they are in good shape. Maybe i should put some vittoria diamonte 220tpi or come open corso cx.

the getting going seems harder. But it might be my mind


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:42 am 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cloudnine, Google Adsense [Bot], LouisN, Stegger, Yahoo [Bot] and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Fuji Transonic aero road bike

in Road

53x12

5

1709

Fri Jul 04, 2014 9:28 pm

Otter View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. TT bike mods for aero+weight

in Road

ITTY

13

989

Sat Jul 26, 2014 10:53 pm

Pokerface07 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Aero Seatpost: cutting weight, ideas?

in Road

prebsy

5

352

Thu Sep 25, 2014 6:02 pm

BmanX View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Garmin mount for aero road bars (not TT bars!)

in Road

duckson

9

768

Tue Oct 14, 2014 8:34 pm

kirgis1 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. New aero test: 12 aero frames vs 12 "unaero" light frames

[ Go to page: 1 ... 17, 18, 19 ]

in Road

fa63

280

20801

Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:37 pm

dunbar42 View the latest post


It is currently Tue Oct 21, 2014 1:35 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB