HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25808 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 1264, 1265, 1266, 1267, 1268, 1269, 1270 ... 1721  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 9:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 7:10 pm
Posts: 331
naive.

Look at it the other way. Dopers have always been a step ahead of testers, and historically few winners have failed doping control. Hence we can safely ignore passed tests; they are simply not an indicator of doping.

Is it possible for one team to have methods that others do not; again historically yes.

Froome's acceleration away from Contador had all the hallmarks of doping of old. Do you really believe that this was a manifestation of marginal gains - against a rider like Contador?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 9:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 396
Location: Vladivostok
Have any of the riders in the peleton publicly, or collectively said anything or insinuated anything along the lines of what many on here are thinking?
The reason I ask, is cos during the Giro, several of the riders (well pretty much all the peleton if you read CN) were quoted as being certain that Di Luca and Santambroggio were doping, and that this was the general consensus of the group during the entire 3 weeks, and I am just wondering if there's any whispers in this tour?

_________________
KWalker wrote:
chill out perv dogs, homegirl is still only 17.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 9:37 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 9:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 5:39 pm
Posts: 487
Location: Tropical Wales
I wonder what Oleg would have tweeted if Contador put in the same performance as Froome? :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:48 pm
Posts: 737
Location: Denmark
DanW wrote:
I wonder what Oleg would have tweeted if Contador put in the same performance as Froome? :D

He would probably say that he took Contador out for a steak the previous night.

_________________
-----------------------------
I like Spanish bikes and cars. Riding an Orbea Orca and a Seat Ibiza.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 9:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 1:57 pm
Posts: 15
Completely understand each of your points. It just seems strange that no other pro team is doing the same thing or doing the same thing to the same extent.

The Contador comparison is difficult because it isn't a like for like comparison. What we're seeing now isn't what we would expect to see two or three years ago. Sixth was still a good result don't get me wrong!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 860
Location: London
Re. Tinkov:

What's the saying; He who who lives in glass houses?

_________________
Snacking on carrot sticks - Where did it all go so wrong?
-
Finsbury Park CC


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 10:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 7:44 am
Posts: 529
Location: Australia
prendrefeu wrote:
I don't follow twitter, but I must ask: has there been a twitter-spat between Tinkoff and Froome's Girlfriend yet?


Haha, wait for it...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 10:25 am 
Offline
Shop Owner
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:53 am
Posts: 295
SKY is running the systematic doping regime for sure . They are after yearly glory but not making the LA mistake of being the same doped rider every year . It was Wiggo then Froome. Next Riche will take the leader position and dope his way to Paris in 2014 ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 10:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:35 pm
Posts: 1344
Location: Geneva
My theory is that SKY is not running systematic doping. I actually believe Wiggins was clean. He smashed the TT's and climbed ok in a non-mountainous Tour against a weak field (sh!t, TJ was 5th) with a monstorously strong team. I think Froome has gotten too big for Brailsford to take down, 'too big to fail' if you like, but he's obvioulsy found some designer drug. And it will probably, in highsight, shed some light on the rift between Froome and Wiggins.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:48 pm
Posts: 737
Location: Denmark
Danish sportsprofessor, and bike rider, Lars Nybo is questioning the performance of Froome. Not so much the fact that he rides fast, but the fact that there's a difference of 5.3% down to the closest competitor. At the Olympic 100 meter run it was 1.2% from 1st to 2nd, in the marathon it was 0.34% and triathlon it was 0.16%. The "normal" range is from 0-2%, so a 5.3% is huge.

_________________
-----------------------------
I like Spanish bikes and cars. Riding an Orbea Orca and a Seat Ibiza.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 10:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:40 am
Posts: 324
ultyguy wrote:
French radio coverage was essentially calling him Rasmussen for all intensive purposes.



The saying is "intents and purposes".

I really don't think Oleg Tinkoff gives a shit about libel, how would damages be enforced even if a multi millionaire lost?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 11:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:20 pm
Posts: 1136
Location: New Zealand
I want to know what gearing the top guys were using today.

_________________
2012 BMC SLR 6.02kg http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=110390


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 11:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 5:39 pm
Posts: 487
Location: Tropical Wales
I agree with ultyguy more than the comments suggesting systematic doping across the whole team.

As I have said before, Froome seems like the most ruthlessly ambitious guy in SKY (just a meaningless opinion based on some of his comments and behaviour last year) so if anything I would be worried about Froome eating steak by himself rather than the team having steak parties :D I don't believe Wiggins or Brailsford are stupid or desperate enough to dope but I wonder if they have doubts about Froome too?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 11:07 am 
Offline
Formerly known as wassertreter

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:08 am
Posts: 1808
Location: Pedal Square
Why are people just looking at Froome and screaming doping? Where are the Schlecks, Evans that were supposed to be podium contenders (ok Valverde was unlucky)? Their place is being taken by the Kreuzigers and Fuglsangs, who are deluxe domestiques normally.

Kreuziger (solid performance!) three seconds behind his Captain after 2 weeks? Hopefully nobody is suggesting Contador is in top form, but when people cry foul over Froome dropping them, it seems many do.

Glad to see Rodriguez going strong. Hope he can do something in the last week.

_________________
Bikes: Raw Ti, 650b flatbar CX


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 11:07 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 860
Location: London
Kermithimself wrote:
Danish sportsprofessor, and bike rider, Lars Nybo is questioning the performance of Froome. Not so much the fact that he rides fast, but the fact that there's a difference of 5.3% down to the closest competitor. At the Olympic 100 meter run it was 1.2% from 1st to 2nd, in the marathon it was 0.34% and triathlon it was 0.16%. The "normal" range is from 0-2%, so a 5.3% is huge.


Um-wat?

He was 29 seconds faster than Quintana up Ventoux, which equates to just under 1% for the climb. Overall in the tour, he is 0.1% ahead of Mollema in total GC time.

_________________
Snacking on carrot sticks - Where did it all go so wrong?
-
Finsbury Park CC


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25808 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 1264, 1265, 1266, 1267, 1268, 1269, 1270 ... 1721  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: airwise, kya, ultimobici and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. "Where should alloy tubular rims go" discussion

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

in Everything wheels

LouisN

33

2833

Sat Sep 07, 2013 11:53 pm

Canadian View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling Technology

in Road

YinYang

4

802

Wed Jan 08, 2014 6:12 pm

coloclimber View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Youth Cycling

in Cycle Chat

xnavalav8r

4

415

Sun Dec 29, 2013 1:02 pm

xnavalav8r View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling news app

in Cycle Chat

tinchy

3

303

Tue Dec 31, 2013 1:39 am

btompkins0112 View the latest post


It is currently Thu Jul 10, 2014 6:19 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB