HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28229 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 1242, 1243, 1244, 1245, 1246, 1247, 1248 ... 1882  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:04 am
Posts: 2385
Location: Mississippi
Just saying they didn't gut the entire team like Sky did....if Sky controlled the race yesterday like they did Saturday then the suspicions would be very high.

_________________
Cervelo R3

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=125962


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:51 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 3927
Location: Bay Area
MattSoutherden wrote:
strobbekoen wrote:
Not sure if this been posted before, but some numbers on the final climb saturday

Froome: 435W , 24'41"
Contador: 361W


Yes. If he was at 6.5W/Kg for 24 minutes. That would seem pretty consistent with an ftp of around 6.1/6.2W/Kg

Not sure why that's surprising.

If he rides Ventoux or the d'Huez double at 6.5, then we have a problem.

This explains it a bit. I'm not convinced it was super dirty, but rather a product of a perfectly executed stage and seizing control of the moment: http://veloclinic.tumblr.com/post/54770 ... rning-shot

_________________
Don't take me too seriously.
Bike
Strava


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:48 am
Posts: 759
Location: Brighton, UK
I actually like to think Porte is riding clean. Ive always liked his style of racing and being an australian my self I would hate to come to realize otherwise.

What I didnt like was his post race interview on stage 8 where he arrogantly downgraded Quintana and his tactics basically calling him an idiot with a "what was he thinking when he attacked?". If thats not disrespecting your adversaries I dont know what is.

As to my prior comments I would have thought Porte would have tried to minimize his losses after he lost touch to the main group. A top 10 finish would have been in his reach easily but I guess he's fully dedicated to Froome and not thinking of his personal ambitions. Those will probably wait for the vuelta. Hey he may even had team orders to take it easy.

_________________
Strava


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:48 am
Posts: 759
Location: Brighton, UK
strobbekoen wrote:
He was at 6.3 W/kg for 24 min
Contador 5.91


Didnt sports science say he did a low 23min with 6.5W/kg? Maybe they got it wrong

_________________
Strava


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 10:01 am
Posts: 245
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Can we talk about Quitana now? Boy, he's flying! So far he's the only rider that ride with panache, and for that i think he deserve more attention, air time, column inches, etc etc.

Also I think he was actually able to attack and leave Froome on the final climb yesterday, but given there was a descent right after, best if he isnt attacking. After all he demonstrated a fairly poor descending skill in stage 8. i hope he wont lose much time at tomorrow's ITT.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:31 pm
Posts: 997
Life's really easy in the mountains for guys that are four foot tall and weigh the same as a packet of peanuts.

ITT's are somewhat more challenging for them - that's the joyous nature of the sport.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 1:54 pm
Posts: 377
Location: Northern Italy close to Gavia and Mortirolo
aerozy wrote:
strobbekoen wrote:
He was at 6.3 W/kg for 24 min
Contador 5.91


Didnt sports science say he did a low 23min with 6.5W/kg? Maybe they got it wrong


even if I like to do these simple calculations too, W/Kg from VAM is affected by many variables: http://blog.aeroweenie.com/2013/07/watt ... l?spref=fb" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; so there's always a part, not marginal, of error.

_________________
website: http://massarob.info
Strava http://app.strava.com/athletes/4071
VVSCORE(May14) 99.52 | KOMs 520 | DST ytd 6891Km | Ascent ytd 111738m


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 3927
Location: Bay Area
Quintana can TT decently well too IIRC. He will probably win or podium a Vuelta reasonably soon.

_________________
Don't take me too seriously.
Bike
Strava


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:16 pm
Posts: 44
Location: Poland
Where do you guys take the kg's for the riders from? C'mon... You should know better.
Shouting 6.3, 6.5 is pure... well, let's just say - not very smart.
To be accurate for the w/kg calculation you need precise FTP, wattage for the duration and weight of a rider. What you can be certain of is only a bike weight - 6.8 - 7.2 for most guys. The rest is pure speculation - and most of you seem to forget about it. When using "facts" bring the "facts" forward - not hearsay.

http://blog.aeroweenie.com/2013/07/watt ... -math.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:09 pm
Posts: 2497
Maybe Porte is going to chug a bottle of Jack Daniels with his unborn twin tonight and then ride back into contention tomorrow in a suicide breakaway...

*totally tongue-in-cheek*

_________________
TED
San Diego, CA
Bike Pics
English Custom Steel Internal di2
Litespeed Ghisallo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:23 pm
Posts: 261
Anyone know who the Garmin rider was that took out Kyrienka on that downhill section? What a bone head move.

_________________
http://ddubcustomsportswear.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:20 am
Posts: 1355
It was Kennaugh that was hit

_________________
"Step forward the climber and all those who worship at the altar of lightness" - R. Millar


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:23 pm
Posts: 261
euan wrote:
It was Kennaugh that was hit


Right, got it. Seeing that Kennaugh is a big part of the Sky team, not much being made of that incident. Unlike when Greipal caused that crash, they went on and on about it and laying blame directly at him.

_________________
http://ddubcustomsportswear.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 7:17 pm
Posts: 326
I read it was Hesjedal who connected with Kennaugh. Wind must have caught them shades.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:23 pm
Posts: 261
Pharmstrong wrote:
I read it was Hesjedal who connected with Kennaugh. Wind must have caught them shades.

:lol:

_________________
http://ddubcustomsportswear.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:38 pm 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28229 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 1242, 1243, 1244, 1245, 1246, 1247, 1248 ... 1882  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Rappid, RimClencher and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. 2015 'PRO' cycling discussion

in Cycle Chat

Frankie - B

0

844

Wed Dec 10, 2014 10:20 pm

Frankie - B View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling news app

in Cycle Chat

tinchy

3

497

Tue Dec 31, 2013 1:39 am

btompkins0112 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling in Burlingame

in Cycle Chat

KH1

6

265

Tue Oct 21, 2014 5:59 am

Dalai View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling in skiathos!

in Cycle Chat

Beancouter

2

315

Wed Jul 16, 2014 10:13 pm

Beancouter View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling Technology

in Road

YinYang

4

1097

Wed Jan 08, 2014 6:12 pm

coloclimber View the latest post


It is currently Thu Dec 18, 2014 12:56 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB