HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27958 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1058, 1059, 1060 ... 1864  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:35 pm
Posts: 1495
Location: Geneva
At least he got the tires right ;-)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 1:17 pm
Posts: 865
Location: Hamar, Norway
Trek. This bike is so stupid it needs a rider of real cunning to win.

_________________
Bianchi-Campagnolo


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:51 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:49 pm
Posts: 715
Location: Netherlands
Well, the trek hate goes far beyond the quality of their products, which is of course quite average. But the brand couldn't be more wrong, as the graphic and the general image, what they represent, etc... It's the chosen bike from diverse wrong characters, from Lance Armstrong to president George Bush. Trek bought and then destroyed brands which were infinitely better, like Gary Fisher, KLEIN, and even Lemond...

Not hating Trek enormously shows quite a lack of knowledge regarding cycling equipment culture, history, tradition and development. Not hating trek it's a shame, it's embarrasing. :shock: :shock: :shock:

_________________
Happy Trails !!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:39 am
Posts: 2348
stella-azzurra wrote:
I've yet to hear of a pro rider complain that their equipment is sub par and hampers their performance.
Even when they are not on the team they work for.
It's either bad luck, a mechanical (which happens from time to time), bad decisions, bad timing, or no legs.
If the bike works without any mechanical it's never the bike.
Mind you they have trained on this bike since the beginning of the season and all the issues will be sorted out in training not during their target race.


That is because they are *professional*. It is not wise to shit in ones nest. Hence you will never hear a bad word about equipment - they are paying the bills. Hence also why riders always give rave reviews when the new bike sponsors are on board.

_________________
"Physiology is all just propaganda and lies... all waiting to be disproven by the next study."
"I'm not a real doctor; But I am a real worm; I am an actual worm." - TMBG


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 1:17 pm
Posts: 865
Location: Hamar, Norway
Re: Liggeros post above.
Trek teaming up with Qhubeka is perhaps part of a strategy to get back into the public concience as a "good" brand. Their previous figurehead backfired enormously, but of course not before he'd helped them shift tons and tons of bikes.

I'm sure the Domane is a pretty nice bike. Shame it says Trek on it.

_________________
Bianchi-Campagnolo


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 12:04 am
Posts: 1118
Location: Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
Tapeworm wrote:
stella-azzurra wrote:
I've yet to hear of a pro rider complain that their equipment is sub par and hampers their performance.
Even when they are not on the team they work for.
It's either bad luck, a mechanical (which happens from time to time), bad decisions, bad timing, or no legs.
If the bike works without any mechanical it's never the bike.
Mind you they have trained on this bike since the beginning of the season and all the issues will be sorted out in training not during their target race.


That is because they are *professional*. It is not wise to shit in ones nest. Hence you will never hear a bad word about equipment - they are paying the bills. Hence also why riders always give rave reviews when the new bike sponsors are on board.


Phillipe Gilbert made a thinly veiled swipe at Easton wheels in a tweet just before the TDU.

https://twitter.com/PhilippeGilbert/status/293228929035153408

_________________
Bike Pure


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:39 am
Posts: 2348
And if Easton was the sponsor probably the same style of tweet.

_________________
"Physiology is all just propaganda and lies... all waiting to be disproven by the next study."
"I'm not a real doctor; But I am a real worm; I am an actual worm." - TMBG


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 6:34 pm
Posts: 190
Kjetil wrote:
Re: Liggeros post above.
Trek teaming up with Qhubeka is perhaps part of a strategy to get back into the public concience as a "good" brand. Their previous figurehead backfired enormously, but of course not before he'd helped them shift tons and tons of bikes.

I'm sure the Domane is a pretty nice bike. Shame it says Trek on it.


I might have missed it but why the Trek hate? So they backed rider who doped, is there a bike brand who hasn't?

I'm thinking Taylor Phinney is going to win a classic this spring and going to do it great style.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 5:37 am
Posts: 187
The way I remember it Klein were virtually insolvent when they were bought by Trek, so if anything they were kept alive by the sale.

Klein died because they were known for producing fat tubed aluminium frames in a world of thin tubed steel frames. As carbon took over and alloy became unfashionable, they lost their brand image completely. Litespeed and Cannondale almost went the same way and had to reinvent themselves.

Sorry, this has nothing to do with Pro cycling.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 1:17 pm
Posts: 865
Location: Hamar, Norway
It's always fun taking a dig on Trek, LeePatron.
Their treatment of Greg Lemond (with their wonderboy LA pulling the strings) was appalling. But I'm not hating, unless that word thas been watered out. I'm more like indifferent to the brand. I'd rather get a Merida.

_________________
Bianchi-Campagnolo


Last edited by Kjetil on Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 7:27 pm
Posts: 2509
Location: Manchester, UK
Trek dumped the Lemond brand as a business decision if they had been the cash cow or the goose that laid the golden egg they would have kept it going. They were obviously a loss making part of the business so had to go. Maybe LA did have a say but if that had been bad for the business I'm pretty sure it wouldn't have happened.

I enjoyed my 6.9ssl it was a good bike now however I am over 40 so I had to get an Italian bike


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 2:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:44 am
Posts: 1394
LeePaton wrote:
I'm thinking Taylor Phinney is going to win a classic this spring and going to do it great style.


yea i [s]think[/s] hope so too
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:35 am
Posts: 5020
Location: New York
Tapeworm wrote:
stella-azzurra wrote:
I've yet to hear of a pro rider complain that their equipment is sub par and hampers their performance.
Even when they are not on the team they work for.
It's either bad luck, a mechanical (which happens from time to time), bad decisions, bad timing, or no legs.
If the bike works without any mechanical it's never the bike.
Mind you they have trained on this bike since the beginning of the season and all the issues will be sorted out in training not during their target race.


That is because they are *professional*. It is not wise to shit in ones nest. Hence you will never hear a bad word about equipment - they are paying the bills. Hence also why riders always give rave reviews when the new bike sponsors are on board.


Pros will offer a good professional critique of equipment and that sponsor will listen and make the necessary fixes before they race. They depend on a pros honest opinion before it they get to the target race or gets to market in some form.
The bottom line is that a pros performance is based on their fitness when it comes time to perform. Like I said there is bad luck, a mechanical, bad decisions, bad timing, or not being physically and mentally prepared.

_________________
I never took drugs to improve my performance at any time. I will be willing to stick my finger into a polygraph test if anyone with big media pull wants to take issue. If you buy a signed poster now it will not be tarnished later. --Graeme Obree


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:35 pm
Posts: 1495
Location: Geneva
Like stella says, it comes down to legs. These days, nobody make total rubbish. I think even up until a few years ago, there were some brands in the bunch not making stuff that was as good as others. The spread between performance of the major and minor brands now is very minor. The only exceptions I can see are contact points (long time users of one brand etc) or people w/ really funky geometry that might need something not offerred by a monocoque frame for example.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:33 pm
Posts: 293
Location: California
watching Dwars door Vlaanderen, Stannard looked super strong considering the blizzard of a race a couple days ago...

_________________
strava / instagram


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:35 pm 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27958 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1058, 1059, 1060 ... 1864  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: nismosr and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling news app

in Cycle Chat

tinchy

3

451

Tue Dec 31, 2013 1:39 am

btompkins0112 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling in Burlingame

in Cycle Chat

KH1

6

214

Tue Oct 21, 2014 5:59 am

Dalai View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling in skiathos!

in Cycle Chat

Beancouter

2

268

Wed Jul 16, 2014 10:13 pm

Beancouter View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling Technology

in Road

YinYang

4

1021

Wed Jan 08, 2014 6:12 pm

coloclimber View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Youth Cycling

in Cycle Chat

xnavalav8r

4

593

Sun Dec 29, 2013 1:02 pm

xnavalav8r View the latest post


It is currently Thu Nov 20, 2014 10:14 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB