HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28285 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 995, 996, 997, 998, 999, 1000, 1001 ... 1886  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:33 am
Posts: 938
Location: Asti, ITALIA
stella-azzurra wrote:
pastronef wrote:
Alex Rasmussen got a message from Uci

https://twitter.com/AlexRazi/status/299 ... 85/photo/1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

:noidea:


Looks like he sent it to himself :lol: :lol:


ahah, no :thumbup:
there is even the number 0041 - 24 (that's swiss code and 24 area code for Aigle...)


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:12 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 3943
Location: Bay Area
ave wrote:
>That's 5 minute power and not that crazy.
Not crazy for a man. So, now we now that Vos would get dropped from the men's Tour peleton. And what does it tell us?? F*** all.

Women are inherently weaker, different muscle fibers perhaps, higher fat percentages, etc. It's quite obvious really.
Look at running. Surely one can't say that women's athletics' "level is very low"... 5000meters' men's & women's WR differ by about 13%, more than 90seconds. (maybe it's even possible to calcualte power difference from running times?)


Which is why women's sports are boring. Sorry, but its true. WNBA anyone?

_________________
Don't take me too seriously.
Bike
Strava


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 3943
Location: Bay Area
ave wrote:
Kasparz wrote:
Yes, you could. Do you believe in yourself, that is the question?

I do race, and I do get dropped with these numbers. Which -if this table is correct- means that the general level of racing here is not that bad after all. This is what I find suprising. Preconceptions, I guess.


The table is not definitive. I have a domestic pro number, but have never won with that number. Its merely a sample of what riders across the spectrum have, but it has nothing to do with actual predictions of success.

For a local anecdote, I'm not an amazing rider- a normal cat 3 with a few strengths. I live in an area with lots of elite and domestic pro riders, many of which attend the weekend group rides. So do several females that have won NRC criteriums, road races, and other top level events. I manage to hang just fine, but they regularly get dropped. In fact, only 1 has ever completed the entire ride. That one has pretty good numbers on the chart above- higher for females than I am for males, but fact remains she has gotten dropped from the mens cat 3/4 races shes done and never finished a men's 1/2/3 race on an easy course but she has beaten a few of the top female pros in some big races. So anecdotally speaking I bet Evelyn Stephens or Kristen Armstrong or Marianne Vos could probably power away from me somehow, but outside of that select swath of the top 20 and even at the domestic elite level the speed differences are pretty stark.

_________________
Don't take me too seriously.
Bike
Strava


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 1:17 pm
Posts: 874
Location: Hamar, Norway
KWalker wrote:
ave wrote:
>That's 5 minute power and not that crazy.
Not crazy for a man. So, now we now that Vos would get dropped from the men's Tour peleton. And what does it tell us?? F*** all.

Women are inherently weaker, different muscle fibers perhaps, higher fat percentages, etc. It's quite obvious really.
Look at running. Surely one can't say that women's athletics' "level is very low"... 5000meters' men's & women's WR differ by about 13%, more than 90seconds. (maybe it's even possible to calcualte power difference from running times?)

Which is why women's sports are boring. Sorry, but its true. WNBA anyone?
What utter bollocks.

_________________
Bianchi-Campagnolo


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:04 am
Posts: 2391
Location: Mississippi
Yes, the only women's sport I can stand to watch is beach volleyball........

_________________
Cervelo R3

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=125962


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:22 pm 
Offline
Shop Wrench

Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:31 am
Posts: 161
Location: Belgian border
Just a quick reminder chaps..

Image
Image

1 Niki Terpstra OmegaPharma- Quick-Step 1:49:50
2 Marc de Maar United Healthcare + 0:00:00
3 Thomas de Gendt Vacansoleil-DCM + 0:00:04
12 Ellen van Dijk Specialized Lululemon + 0:01:01
14 Chris Froome Sky + 0:01:01
15 Joaquim Rodriguez Katusha + 0:01:04
21 Marianne Vos Rabobank + 0:01:41
22 Annemiek van Vleuten Rabobank + 0:02:07


Last edited by roselend on Thu Feb 07, 2013 7:19 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:04 am
Posts: 378
Kjetil wrote:
KWalker wrote:
ave wrote:
>That's 5 minute power and not that crazy.
Not crazy for a man. So, now we now that Vos would get dropped from the men's Tour peleton. And what does it tell us?? F*** all.

Women are inherently weaker, different muscle fibers perhaps, higher fat percentages, etc. It's quite obvious really.
Look at running. Surely one can't say that women's athletics' "level is very low"... 5000meters' men's & women's WR differ by about 13%, more than 90seconds. (maybe it's even possible to calcualte power difference from running times?)

Which is why women's sports are boring. Sorry, but its true. WNBA anyone?
What utter bollocks.


Utter bollocks indeed. This prat obviously didn't see the womens Olympic RR to name only one event. Absolutely epic.

_________________
Colnago M10 viewtopic.php?f=10&t=91208&hilit=colnago+m10+maob
Simplon Pavo III viewtopic.php?f=10&t=116069"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 1:54 pm
Posts: 377
Location: Northern Italy close to Gavia and Mortirolo
Giro Women -aka Giro Donne- (and they are still pro so it's not off topic) is an enterataining race, just look in YouTube for Montecatini (2012), Mortirolo, Valdidentro and Stelvio (2011) stages. You can find the ~1h highlights with full not edited finale.
And the top girls (e.g. Vos, Abbot, Pooley) are climbing good VAMs and thus producing good W/Kg and their battles are less boring than some (most?) men races.
These girls, even if few in numbers, climb well and fast, but if you just appreciate criteriums then they don't provide the same show as pro men.

_________________
website: http://massarob.info
Strava http://app.strava.com/athletes/4071
VVSCORE(May14) 99.52 | KOMs 520 | DST ytd 6891Km | Ascent ytd 111738m


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 7:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 3943
Location: Bay Area
Wow a grand fondo for results- like that indicates anything meaningful.

Sure the racing can be interesting from time to time, but like all professional sports there are rarely disciplines where it is on the same level. I watched the races you mentioned as they happened and found them OK, but rare rather than consistent examples.

The women's RR wasn't any more exciting than the men's IMO.

_________________
Don't take me too seriously.
Bike
Strava


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 7:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 5:45 pm
Posts: 178
roselend wrote:
Just a quick reminder chaps..


1 Niki Terpstra OmegaPharma- Quick-Step 1:49:50
2 Marc de Maar United Healthcare + 0:00:00
3 Thomas de Gendt Vacansoleil-DCM + 0:00:04
12 Ellen van Dijk Specialized Lululemon + 0:01:01
14 Chris Froome Sky + 0:01:01
15 Joaquim Rodriguez Katusha + 0:01:04
21 Marianne Vos Rabobank + 0:01:41
22 Annemiek van Vleuten Rabobank + 0:02:07
So?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 7:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 3943
Location: Bay Area
Look dudes our wives/girlfriends/people who evaluate us for equality are not here. I'm not saying women are lesser than men and at some sports can be pretty damn impressive, but for competitive sports that involve racing, strength, etc. they're more boring as they go slower, score less, and are generally less physical.

_________________
Don't take me too seriously.
Bike
Strava


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7371
Location: San Francisco, CA
If the field is uniformly weaker, the racing can be just as exciting. The issue with women's sports tends to be depth.

On basketball, I actually prefer women's. I don't relate at all to men's basketball. It has no relation to when I play. With women, the basket's actually high, as the game was designed. They're way better than I am, of course, but at least within the order of magnitude needed that I can relate.

Cycling's different. The women's Olympic RR was simply amazing. The men's scene got a bit absurd, but with the biological passport the riders are a bit more mortal now, a bit slower and more prone to fatigue, and it's a lot more interesting. But the women more generally suffer from less depth.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1
\


Last edited by djconnel on Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:44 am
Posts: 1410
professional women's volleyball is WAY more exciting to watch that men's. This i promise all of you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:12 pm 
Offline
Shop Wrench

Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:31 am
Posts: 161
Location: Belgian border
Not trying to prove anything here, thought it was interesting to show the results of a race where men and women rode together. You may have noticed that doesn't happen often...

Yes, women have less physical power, lower lung capacity, smaller hearts, lower cardiac output etc. It's called natural selection.

What are we discussing again?


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:12 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Posts: 5096
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed
roselend wrote:
Not trying to prove anything here, thought it was interesting to show the results of a race where men and women rode together.
Except that apparently it wasn't really a race.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28285 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 995, 996, 997, 998, 999, 1000, 1001 ... 1886  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: chrisbike, farm_lim and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. 2015 'PRO' cycling discussion

in Cycle Chat

Frankie - B

0

1034

Wed Dec 10, 2014 10:20 pm

Frankie - B View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. New Bike Discussion - Emonda, BH, or Bianchi Infinito CV

in Road

jefftillack

9

330

Wed Dec 24, 2014 10:26 am

kgt View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling in Burlingame

in Cycle Chat

KH1

6

274

Tue Oct 21, 2014 5:59 am

Dalai View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling in skiathos!

in Cycle Chat

Beancouter

2

371

Wed Jul 16, 2014 10:13 pm

Beancouter View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cycling Technology

in Road

YinYang

4

1158

Wed Jan 08, 2014 6:12 pm

coloclimber View the latest post


It is currently Thu Dec 25, 2014 8:20 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB