Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:05 am
NS wrote:Wonder when SRM are going to run out of 7800 cranks?
Given that's 7900, maybe they already have
Given that's 7900, maybe they already have
Weight Weenies
Forum
https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/
"PRO" Cycling Discussion
https://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=75179
Page 969 of 1889
Given that's 7900, maybe they already have
Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:20 pm
Really? Would you like to have another look at the crank not the pm the crank looks like the 7800 one on my 7900 SRM
Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:20 pm
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:28 pm
Haven't seen any other arms than 7800 used either. If the new ones were to be machined like the 7800 are I guess there would be a gaping hole at the end due to the hollow construction?
Probably not too difficult for SRM to get their hands on a bunch of NOS OEM 7800 arms?
Probably not too difficult for SRM to get their hands on a bunch of NOS OEM 7800 arms?
Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:38 pm
GIRO helmets for Katusha
http://twitter.com/PuritoRodriguez/stat ... 28/photo/1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://twitter.com/PuritoRodriguez/stat ... 37/photo/1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
they lost Rabo/ Blanco, but they now have IAM and Katusha and BMC (together with Garmin and Champion Systems)
http://twitter.com/PuritoRodriguez/stat ... 28/photo/1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://twitter.com/PuritoRodriguez/stat ... 37/photo/1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
they lost Rabo/ Blanco, but they now have IAM and Katusha and BMC (together with Garmin and Champion Systems)
Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:58 pm
At last no more those ugly carerra helmets
Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:04 pm
The 'new' Dura-Ace SRM PowerMeter crank still uses the 7800 arms. It is a problem. Eventually, they will run-out...
Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:37 pm
NS wrote:Really? Would you like to have another look at the crank not the pm the crank looks like the 7800 one on my 7900 SRM
I took 'crank' as the collective, not a reference to the arms
Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:18 pm
ave wrote:I know it's nothing new, but these bars seems extremely narrow for Hansen's size.
What I don't really know is what's the benefit?
confirmed, 38 cm bars
https://mobile.twitter.com/inrng/status ... 187457?p=v
Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:24 pm
Is that
c to c
or
o to o (in which case, really narrow)
?
c to c
or
o to o (in which case, really narrow)
?
Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:26 pm
HammerTime2 wrote:Is that
c to c
or
o to o (in which case, really narrow)
?
c/c
Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:31 pm
Narrow!
Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:49 pm
165mm for Kashechkin
Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:08 pm
Less flex in the sprint. Definitely acquired from the track.
djconnel wrote:Narrow!
Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:54 pm
Wilier: Woah... craziest thing I've seen here! 
165 mm is a lot. Assuming his bars doesn't have a lot of reach though, that would make it even crazier.
165 mm is a lot. Assuming his bars doesn't have a lot of reach though, that would make it even crazier.
Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 8:06 pm
165mm is surely a bad frame size?
Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 8:06 pm
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com