"PRO" Cycling Discussion

Moderator: Moderator Team

Page 969 of 1889

[ 28331 posts ]

Go to page Previous  1 ... 966, 967, 968, 969, 970, 971, 972 ... 1889  Next

Print view Previous topic | Next topic

Author	Message
maquisard	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:01 am
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:51 pm Posts: 997 Location: France	Exactly, people assume that Pro teams always train on the top of range kit. They don't, particularly the domestiques. Ultegra is fine.
Top

Weenie	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:01 am
Top

Tinea Pedis	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:05 am
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am Posts: 7557 Location: Geeeelong!	NS wrote: Wonder when SRM are going to run out of 7800 cranks? Given that's 7900, maybe they already have _________________ http://www.nicksquillari.com.au
Top

NS	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:20 pm
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 7:27 pm Posts: 2510 Location: Manchester, UK	Really? Would you like to have another look at the crank not the pm the crank looks like the 7800 one on my 7900 SRM
Top

djm	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:28 pm
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 12:19 pm Posts: 1116 Location: Norway	Haven't seen any other arms than 7800 used either. If the new ones were to be machined like the 7800 are I guess there would be a gaping hole at the end due to the hollow construction? Probably not too difficult for SRM to get their hands on a bunch of NOS OEM 7800 arms?
Top

pastronef	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:38 pm
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:33 am Posts: 959 Location: Asti, ITALIA	GIRO helmets for Katusha http://twitter.com/PuritoRodriguez/stat ... 28/photo/1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://twitter.com/PuritoRodriguez/stat ... 37/photo/1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; they lost Rabo/ Blanco, but they now have IAM and Katusha and BMC (together with Garmin and Champion Systems)
Top

Willier	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:58 pm
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 4:37 pm Posts: 1377	At last no more those ugly carerra helmets _________________ "Smart may have the answers, but stupid have all the interesting questions."
Top

Geoff	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:04 pm
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2003 2:25 am Posts: 4528 Location: Canada	The 'new' Dura-Ace SRM PowerMeter crank still uses the 7800 arms. It is a problem. Eventually, they will run-out...
Top

Tinea Pedis	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:37 pm
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am Posts: 7557 Location: Geeeelong!	NS wrote: Really? Would you like to have another look at the crank not the pm the crank looks like the 7800 one on my 7900 SRM I took 'crank' as the collective, not a reference to the arms _________________ http://www.nicksquillari.com.au
Top

pastronef	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:18 pm
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:33 am Posts: 959 Location: Asti, ITALIA	ave wrote: I know it's nothing new, but these bars seems extremely narrow for Hansen's size. What I don't really know is what's the benefit? confirmed, 38 cm bars https://mobile.twitter.com/inrng/status ... 187457?p=v
Top

HammerTime2	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:24 pm
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed	Is that c to c or o to o (in which case, really narrow) ?
Top

pastronef	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:26 pm
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:33 am Posts: 959 Location: Asti, ITALIA	HammerTime2 wrote: Is that c to c or o to o (in which case, really narrow) ? c/c
Top

djconnel	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:31 pm
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm Posts: 7406 Location: San Francisco, CA	Narrow! _________________ http://djconnel.blogspot.com/ Fuji SL/1
Top

Willier	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 5:49 pm
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 4:37 pm Posts: 1377	165mm for Kashechkin _________________ "Smart may have the answers, but stupid have all the interesting questions."
Top

stella-azzurra	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:08 pm
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:35 am Posts: 5036 Location: New York	Less flex in the sprint. Definitely acquired from the track. djconnel wrote: Narrow! _________________ I never took drugs to improve my performance at any time. I will be willing to stick my finger into a polygraph test if anyone with big media pull wants to take issue. If you buy a signed poster now it will not be tarnished later. --Graeme Obree
Top

Weenie	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:08 pm
Top

djm	Post subject: Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:54 pm
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 12:19 pm Posts: 1116 Location: Norway	Wilier: Woah... craziest thing I've seen here! 165 mm is a lot. Assuming his bars doesn't have a lot of reach though, that would make it even crazier.
Top

Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending

Page 969 of 1889

[ 28331 posts ]

Go to page Previous  1 ... 966, 967, 968, 969, 970, 971, 972 ... 1889  Next