Page 923 of 1889

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:44 am
by Tapeworm
^ No. But "Manx RPG" doesn't have the same ring to it.

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:33 am
by Tinea Pedis
Rogers* apparently to Saxo-Tinkov.


*damn auto correct!

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:33 am
by Weenie

Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:33 am
by Jamiemcp
On the surface it's a surprising move, something to do with Sky's doping policy?

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:13 pm
by Willier
Tinea Pedis wrote:Rodgers apparently to Saxo-Tinkov.


You mean Mick Rogers? In that case :shock:

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:24 pm
by Tinea Pedis
Well I'm certainly not referring to Buck Rogers :lol:

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:12 pm
by Rodrego Hernandez
Willier wrote:
Tinea Pedis wrote:Rodgers apparently to Saxo-Tinkov.


You mean Mick Rogers? In that case :shock:



Teflon Mick ;)

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:26 pm
by SvenNijs
Jamiemcp wrote:On the surface it's a surprising move, something to do with Sky's doping policy?

Saxo-Tinkov certainly seem less concerned about their riders or staff members past than SKY currently are (which may, or may not, be a good thing).

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:27 pm
by ave
Re:Rogers. It's quite obvious.

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 12:41 am
by Ghost234
Could this new addition put Saxo in Worldtour status for 2013? Last I read, they were something like 100 points shy from being accepted.


Some race organizers have also said that they would give wildcard invites only to members of MPCC, so Saxo could be out of the grand tour game next year - a huge dissapointment. I really want too see Contador at the Tour this year.

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 1:12 am
by jmilliron
Ghost234 wrote:Could this new addition put Saxo in Worldtour status for 2013? Last I read, they were something like 100 points shy from being accepted.


Nope. I've read that the deadline for that has long passed. It might still help them get one of the remaining slots though. Give them an edge over the other teams that are being considered.

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 5:40 am
by jooo
Re: Rogers

Wasn't his contract at Sky meant to be good for another couple of years still?

The world tour points thing sounds like quite a possibility, maybe Saxo-Tinkoff want someone who'll actually be a fair bit more useful on flatter stages and TTT's :noidea:

Maybe Rogers can't stay with Sky simply because of the Ferrari connection, regardless of whether or not any doping actually took place? :noidea:

Or maybe things are just gettin' real dirty :noidea:

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:11 pm
by record
Looks like Cavendish likes his new OPQS teammates.

http://www.joj.sk/relacia-sport/sport-a ... sport.html

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:35 pm
by jmilliron
All I see is Cav taking a nap at the airport. Am I missing something?

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:36 pm
by trychle
I do not speak Slovak, but it looks like he was just dog-tired from shooting missles all day..

EDIT: read jmilliron's post for the short version.

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:51 pm
by record
What I meant is that he enjoys spending some time with them in the evening therefore he has hangover on the next day.

Re: "PRO" Cycling Discussion

Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:51 pm
by Weenie

Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com