Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:53 am

All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6840 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1441 442 443 444 445456 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:39 am
Posts: 1055
Location: Front Range, CO
Haydn wrote:
53x12 wrote:

If these guys aren't healthy to compete and need to take TUE, then guess what, maybe they aren't healthy enough to compete and should sit out.
I used to have asthma when i was a child, its pretty much gone now but i get it occasionally when i have a cold & it can be debilitating. When it is I use Salbutamol & within 2 seconds i go from seriously struggling for breath to being 100% fine, its a wonder of medical science as far as I'm concerned.

It would seem pretty harsh to ban asthmatics from sport because of a dubious suspicion that their medication is unfairly performance enhancing
If you can't breathe because of a naturally occurring condition, how is taking a substance to enhance your body's natural ability NOT cheating?


Top
   
 
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:11 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 4:27 pm
Posts: 255
LeDuke wrote:
Haydn wrote:
53x12 wrote:

If these guys aren't healthy to compete and need to take TUE, then guess what, maybe they aren't healthy enough to compete and should sit out.
I used to have asthma when i was a child, its pretty much gone now but i get it occasionally when i have a cold & it can be debilitating. When it is I use Salbutamol & within 2 seconds i go from seriously struggling for breath to being 100% fine, its a wonder of medical science as far as I'm concerned.

It would seem pretty harsh to ban asthmatics from sport because of a dubious suspicion that their medication is unfairly performance enhancing
If you can't breathe because of a naturally occurring condition, how is taking a substance to enhance your body's natural ability NOT cheating?
`...enhance your body's natural ability...', when I was racing my `natural' peak flow was 700, during an asthma attack it could drop to around 600-650, after taking Salbutamol it MIGHT get back to just under 700, but more often than not it didn't. By the way my asthma is regularly triggered by something that is not a naturally occurring condition, air pollution.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:52 am
Posts: 596
LeDuke wrote:
Haydn wrote:
53x12 wrote:

If these guys aren't healthy to compete and need to take TUE, then guess what, maybe they aren't healthy enough to compete and should sit out.
I used to have asthma when i was a child, its pretty much gone now but i get it occasionally when i have a cold & it can be debilitating. When it is I use Salbutamol & within 2 seconds i go from seriously struggling for breath to being 100% fine, its a wonder of medical science as far as I'm concerned.

It would seem pretty harsh to ban asthmatics from sport because of a dubious suspicion that their medication is unfairly performance enhancing
If you can't breathe because of a naturally occurring condition, how is taking a substance to enhance your body's natural ability NOT cheating?
well, if it's a recognized and definable medical condition that can land you in the hospital (which asthma can), I'd say it's not cheating to take a puff to restore breathing. But if you are taking 80 puffs, well, you probably shouldn't be riding a bike that day.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:51 pm
Posts: 1720
Location: France
What is interesting in this case with Froome is the Sky press-release. The posturing has already started by the team to separate the rider from the team, I can see Team Sky cutting Froome loose to ensure their future and leave him to answer the awkward questions.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:20 pm
Posts: 1911
Location: New Zealand
He'll get off, somehow.

_________________
2012 BMC SLR 6.02kg http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=110390


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:00 am
Posts: 131
Froome has shown many times it is well within the definition of normal for him to win a GC race.
Thus, taking salbutamol merely returned his performance to normal.
Q.E.D.

_________________
Instagram


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 10:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 5:40 pm
Posts: 600
mrlobber wrote:
Edit: The Inner Ring has a deeper write on this: http://inrng.com/2017/12/chris-froomes-salbutamol-case/
I really enjoyed the inrng article. Maybe this one is new to someone too: http://sportsscientists.com/2017/12/bri ... ol-result/

Very-well written analysis.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 10:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2014 8:46 pm
Posts: 838
Location: Netherlands
RimClencher wrote:
Froome has shown many times it is well within the definition of normal for him to win a GC race.
Thus, taking salbutamol merely returned his performance to normal.
Q.E.D.
But it isn't normal for him to win 2 GC's in a row. And if a medicine makes you return to your normal performance level while being worse a day before, doesn't that show exactly that the medicine is a performance enhancer? The whole game of GC's is being in top shape for as long as possible, if you use a medicine to extend that period that medicine is a performance enhancer.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 10:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2014 8:46 pm
Posts: 838
Location: Netherlands
As there are more important things in life then Froome's possible ban, here is a clip of Stig Broeckx recovering after his coma.
https://twitter.com/SammyNeyrinck/statu ... 7534070784


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 10:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 5:49 am
Posts: 385
Location: Seattle, WA
It's going to take a lot of money under the table for Froome to pass a pharmacokinetic test to prove the levels magically spike 200% over the limit given the prescribed dosage. He's taken Salbutamol every year, so if the findings were "normal" for him then he should have a history of AAF triggering throughout his career.

What's more disturbing is that it took a media leak for this to come out and the UCI/Froome/Sky have known about this for months.. The TUE stuff can be explained by being within the rules and medical confidentiality but we're talking about in-competition AAF for BOTH samples for "the greatest grand tour rider of his generation" here. Absolute farce if he's not punished in some way. That's not to say he won't come back and win a bunch of GTs anyway (like Contador) but it's pretty inexcusable to not face some sort of sanction IMO.

_________________
BMC Teammachine SLR01 (2018) | Rodriguez Rainier (2015)


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:00 am
Posts: 131
Rondje wrote:
But it isn't normal for him to win 2 GC's in a row.
Not yet! But if he were to win two GCs in a row in the future, it would be fair to assume it is normal for him, based on which he should be retrospectively re-awarded the Vuelta title. Fair is fair.
Rondje wrote:
And if a medicine makes you return to your normal performance level while being worse a day before, doesn't that show exactly that the medicine is a performance enhancer?
This is based on anecdotal evidence of a single instance. I am sure laboratory testing can show that Chris Froome will perform normally after a bad day on the bike on multiple occasions without salbutamol, if necessary.

_________________
Instagram


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 6:52 pm
Posts: 1620
You guys talk like this is all surprising.

1)I think that whatever Froome is doing is also being done by his rivals. This is pro cycling and it's not some Sky conspiracy. I just read Tyler Hamiton's book and one of the take-a-ways for me was that even with careful doping protocols someone slips up and gets caught eventually. It's just the odds.

2)My only question is that the drug in question doesn't make sense. It's not very performance enhancing and it's hard to imagine Froome taking 40 puffs of an inhaler in one day. So, is it used as a masking agent?

3) At worst, Froome probably gets a short penalty and is back on track the following year. Maybe he misses the Tour. Maybe, it's a 9 month penalty and he's back at the Vuelta.

_________________
Colnago C59


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2014 8:46 pm
Posts: 838
Location: Netherlands
RimClencher wrote:
Rondje wrote:
But it isn't normal for him to win 2 GC's in a row.
Not yet! But if he were to win two GCs in a row in the future, it would be fair to assume it is normal for him, based on which he should be retrospectively re-awarded the Vuelta title. Fair is fair.
Rondje wrote:
And if a medicine makes you return to your normal performance level while being worse a day before, doesn't that show exactly that the medicine is a performance enhancer?
This is based on anecdotal evidence of a single instance. I am sure laboratory testing can show that Chris Froome will perform normally after a bad day on the bike on multiple occasions without salbutamol, if necessary.
If that was the case then why would he use so much? He obviously had health issues that got in the way of his performance, else he wouldn’t increase the dose. You don’t increase the dose by such a big amount for the fun of it. There is also no need to retrospectivly re-award anything as long as he isn’t punished yet, it’s up to Sky now to prove something (I got no idea what) to clear Froome of these charges before he does get punished.


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:11 pm
Posts: 1336
nemeseri wrote:
mrlobber wrote:
Edit: The Inner Ring has a deeper write on this: http://inrng.com/2017/12/chris-froomes-salbutamol-case/
I really enjoyed the inrng article. Maybe this one is new to someone too: http://sportsscientists.com/2017/12/bri ... ol-result/

Very-well written analysis.
Thanks! indeed very interesting!


Top
   
 
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:26 am 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 1:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 9:20 pm
Posts: 1911
Location: New Zealand
53x12 wrote:
LeDuke wrote:
Why are people with "asthma" allowed to break the rules?

You are what you are; your physical defect is just that. I mean, should I be allowed to take EPO to make up for my 65ml/kg/min VO2 max? A lower-than-others VO2max is a "defect" when it comes to bike racing, too.

Here's the solution: If you have asthma, you stop pedaling, get off your bike, sit down on the ground, and then take your inhaler and compose yourself after your asthma attack. And then you withdraw from the race, because of health concerns.
+1. It is almost as if you don't have 'asthma' that you can't be a top athlete nowadays. I don't have 'asthma' but guess I need to develop 'asthma' so that I don't get dropped on fast group rides.

If these guys aren't healthy to compete and need to take TUE, then guess what, maybe they aren't healthy enough to compete and should sit out.
Exactly what Katie Compton does, gets off her bike if suffering and pulls out

_________________
2012 BMC SLR 6.02kg http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=110390


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6840 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1441 442 443 444 445456 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Pirelli Pzero Velo (and their varience) tire discussion thread.

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Everything wheels

Hexsense

39

7104

Wed Jan 10, 2018 11:44 pm

stormur View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) XTR DI2 on my 2017 Scalpel

in MTB

Wheely

4

1693

Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:51 am

ooo View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2017 Madonne 9.2

in Road

nycjwi

1

1683

Sun Apr 02, 2017 8:27 pm

FIJIGabe View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 2017 Emonda SLR 62 H1 - sub-6kg

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

Clean39T

17

2399

Fri Jan 12, 2018 1:02 pm

jwalther View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited