Liggero wrote:Dopers gonna dope, and you all guys know it very well. 50% of cylists are supposed to have asthma. As if they were smoking Marlboro all day long...
Unnecessary TUE's is like a legalized, permited use of enhance performance drugs. Is it doping; no? Is it cheating, yes? Sky are liers; of course they are.
Welcome to pro-cycling.
No point trying to explain to some posters. The science shows 100% that riders are doping even the BBC showed the huge advantage of doping and how its just not possible for riders like porte to beat a juiced up Armstrong's times up the madone. They just ignore the evidence, the science and really believe that its down to special socks or soft pillows.
Armstrong -Ferrari
Froome - Leinders
Armstrong - tue for corts
Froome - tue for corts
Armstrong and froome have equally similar climb times
Sky are in the exact , near enough, scenario as Armstrong and postal only difference is that sky sometimes burn off some of the best climbers around with 4-6 riders in their train.
They are just a inquisitive journalist away from a bigger down fall than postal
Respond to the post in this digital demimonde without insults would be nice but I'm not sure the xena haters can do that
Let's see