2015 'PRO' cycling discussion
Moderators: robbosmans, Moderator Team
Tactics is one thing, but to beat someone majestically, or as a gentleman, is something different.
I don't favor watching someone sitting at the back of a group and then acting like a boss punching few kms (or even meters) before finish line. Even Sagan's first ever stage win of TdF was like that and Cancellara was clearly upset. Yes, you can sit at the back near the end and save your energy for the last attack. But I would appreciate to show your dominance before as well, pull the group sometimes, keep track of anything going on, and not sit at the back for the whole time rinding in that group and waiting.
Disclaimer: I have watched only last few kms, don't know how Stannard acted for the whole race. And I agree that Etixx clearly failed not winning it, but at the same time I don't praise Stannard that much.
I don't favor watching someone sitting at the back of a group and then acting like a boss punching few kms (or even meters) before finish line. Even Sagan's first ever stage win of TdF was like that and Cancellara was clearly upset. Yes, you can sit at the back near the end and save your energy for the last attack. But I would appreciate to show your dominance before as well, pull the group sometimes, keep track of anything going on, and not sit at the back for the whole time rinding in that group and waiting.
Disclaimer: I have watched only last few kms, don't know how Stannard acted for the whole race. And I agree that Etixx clearly failed not winning it, but at the same time I don't praise Stannard that much.
Panache. Generally = not winning.
Cancellara was rightly pissed off at Sagan as that was a one on one. There's not a rider in the world who, faced with 3 from another team, would pull, work, show your hand early. To do so is weak tactics and a sure fire way to lose. It baffles me how you don't credit Stannard with an incredible ride that no-one watching gave him a chance of winning once it was 3 vs 1.
Races are there to be won, not raced in some sort of romantic ideal that never actually existed.
Cancellara was rightly pissed off at Sagan as that was a one on one. There's not a rider in the world who, faced with 3 from another team, would pull, work, show your hand early. To do so is weak tactics and a sure fire way to lose. It baffles me how you don't credit Stannard with an incredible ride that no-one watching gave him a chance of winning once it was 3 vs 1.
Races are there to be won, not raced in some sort of romantic ideal that never actually existed.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
If Vandenburgh wasn't in the bag he should have been the first to attack the group, followed by Terpstra. Boonen should not have attacked, rather he should have marked Stannard only.
I suspect Etixx lost because they were trying to orchestrate a win for Boonen, rather than a win for the team. You can't play that game against Stannard with that kind of form.
I suspect Etixx lost because they were trying to orchestrate a win for Boonen, rather than a win for the team. You can't play that game against Stannard with that kind of form.
djm, no, surely not. I just want to balance a bias around Stannard a little bit. I agree that Etixx failed and that Stannard managed to win was superb, but I also remember other similar wins when riders had done it even more better (can't find the right word).
Interesting words from Fredrik Kessiakoff: http://velonews.competitor.com/2015/02/ ... ort_361792
When athletes are exposed to this type of pressure from their employer one can perhaps understand why some "buckle" and make the choice of doping.. Fortunately Kessiakoff probably didn't and made the sane decision to quit.. Sad for him though.
When athletes are exposed to this type of pressure from their employer one can perhaps understand why some "buckle" and make the choice of doping.. Fortunately Kessiakoff probably didn't and made the sane decision to quit.. Sad for him though.
- stella-azzurra
- Posts: 5066
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:35 am
- Location: New York
The way I see the whole Stannard win is that there were 3 pros from the same team against 1 pro from another team and in those odds the 3 on the same team almost always win. That's the way 95% of the times it always goes down. Stannard was smart, he hit early to see what happens and got to a sprint with one. The odds are are a lot better then.
I never took drugs to improve my performance at any time. I will be willing to stick my finger into a polygraph test if anyone with big media pull wants to take issue. If you buy a signed poster now it will not be tarnished later. --Graeme Obree
No chapeau for Cav. Just sat on all day didn't he
- stella-azzurra
- Posts: 5066
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:35 am
- Location: New York
"Cavendish was everywhere he needed to be during the race – first making contact with a dangerous break that formed on the slopes of the Côte de Trieu and then, more crucially, on Kristoff’s wheel with 200 metres to go. Even when Etixx did falter – eventually running out of gas in the last kilometre – Cavendish swooped to edge out Kristoff.
Pride for Cavendish but relief for Patrick Lefevere who had found himself on the defence last night after Ian Stannard had singlehandedly taken about his team in Omloop, a feeling that Cavendish will not doubt remind his boss of when the pair sit down for contract negotiations later this year. Next stop, as Cavendish confirmed is Milan-San Remo and another shoot out with the defending champion, Kristoff." --cyclingnews
Pride for Cavendish but relief for Patrick Lefevere who had found himself on the defence last night after Ian Stannard had singlehandedly taken about his team in Omloop, a feeling that Cavendish will not doubt remind his boss of when the pair sit down for contract negotiations later this year. Next stop, as Cavendish confirmed is Milan-San Remo and another shoot out with the defending champion, Kristoff." --cyclingnews
I never took drugs to improve my performance at any time. I will be willing to stick my finger into a polygraph test if anyone with big media pull wants to take issue. If you buy a signed poster now it will not be tarnished later. --Graeme Obree
Cav commenting that Wifried Peeters didn't think he had it in him to win today at the team briefing this morning.
Not a great weekend for that DS.
Not a great weekend for that DS.
martinko wrote:Tactics is one thing, but to beat someone majestically, or as a gentleman, is something different.
It's 3 against 1. Any win in that situation is majestic. Ettix-Quickstep had managed to orchestrate a better situation in the race than even they could have expected - to then expect the 1 opposing rider in a 4 man break to work for you as well is to be completely out of touch with reality. The tables were already massively tipped in their favour - for Stannard to then willingly tip it even further by taking pulls on the front would have been far, far beyond any reasonable notion of fair play.
Classic Kristoff. Not many others than Cav and Kittel who can get around him when he goes like that, and KBK is so short...gravity wrote:Nice sprint by CAV. Kristoff started too early methinks.
wingguy wrote: It's 3 against 1. Any win in that situation is majestic. Ettix-Quickstep had managed to orchestrate a better situation in the race than even they could have expected - to then expect the 1 opposing rider in a 4 man break to work for you as well is to be completely out of touch with reality. The tables were already massively tipped in their favour - for Stannard to then willingly tip it even further by taking pulls on the front would have been far, far beyond any reasonable notion of fair play.
I agree. If I had the DS mike in hand, I would've told my rider not to take a turn in front in that situation.
I also agree that all 3 Ettix-Quickstep riders applied poor tactics, or wrong ones.
Louis:)
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com