Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Fri Sep 30, 2016 7:51 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:35 am
Posts: 5072
Location: New York
HUMP DIESEL wrote:
A good article here on this very same thing, in terms of a Colnago. Notice how the person talks about how each bike fit him, but the one rode better and worked better.
http://www.bikesportmichigan.com/reviews/colnago.shtml

HUMP


That article has been out several years now. I have a few colnagos in the same sizes he uses: 54, 53, 52 cm. Two are c40's and one is a master. All points of contact are the same on all 3.
They are all traditional geometry.

The only difference to note aside from the size is the weight.
The steel frame is heavier and it feels different in the first few rides.

But after a few rides your body adapts into using the frame and the difference (weight, handling) you felt at the beginning is gone.

That is if everything is fitted correctly.

Here is the crux of the matter:

Michael R. Rabe and Colin McMahon were already in excellent form, but I was not fit. When I arrived I put in a 300 mile week and the effects were telling. I came back thinking the Colnago Dream was a bit too stiff for my liking. The truth was I jumped in too quickly. I didn't have my "seat" and I was doing a huge week on a new bike. Under these circumstances no bike would have felt good.

_________________
I never took drugs to improve my performance at any time. I will be willing to stick my finger into a polygraph test if anyone with big media pull wants to take issue. If you buy a signed poster now it will not be tarnished later. --Graeme Obree


Top
   
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:40 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 5319
Location: Bay Area
Cyclingnews and VeloNews *f##k* up his bike stats and measurements

Canyon, size 56: http://www.bikeradar.com/gear/article/p ... -cf-28966/
15mm of spacers and an 8-10mm headset cap. 120mm stem.
555 stack, 396 reach.

BMC, size 50:
140 stem, slammed
530mm of stack, 376mm reach

This suggests that his bars were about 25mm lower on the BMC and questionably the same reach, probably less. The 3T bars he is on are also deeper.

The BMC is actually A LOT shorter, which is why you saw him change frames mid way through the Tour to a bigger size and 40+mm of spacers underneath the stem vs. slammed on the headtube. At one point his stem was flipped up on his WC bike but they changed it the next day.

If you take that amount of spacers into account and the long stem, he could easily go a full 2 sizes up and run a 120 and still need a few spacers. According to my stack/reach spreadsheet if he had the same seat height and setback his super small BMC actually had 4.5cm more drop.

Fit plays an important role into mechanical efficiency. I've seen it in myself and other riders, but there are some curious cases in the pro-ranks too.

Contador's fit has changed and he looks noticeably worse and performs worse, especially since they switched his Shiv sizing around in TT's. Watching him climb seated is absolutely painful. He slides all over the very nose of the saddle and bucks his hip with every stroke.

Sky bring in fitters at every single camp to asses changes from injuries or weight loss/gain. They seem to always look good/comfortable on the bike and are very efficient.

Boonen stopped having back pain when he changed his fit when Speci came on with OPQS.

Cav is famous for changing his seat and bar position daily depending on feel.

Greipel moved his bars up and out when Lotto went to Ridley. He started winning more sprints and sprinted with a slightly lower position.

There have been a lot of riders with documented position changes over the years that have helped mitigate injuries. Gilbert has never been that flexible or had that straight of a back and most of his bikes actually had quite a bit of stack so its weird that BMC pushed the slammed fit.

_________________
Don't take me too seriously. The only person that doesn't hate Froome.
Gramz
Strava


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 12:19 pm
Posts: 1398
Location: Norway
If the brakes are rubbing and the bearings are full of sand; yes, it can be attributed to the bike. Otherwise? No! ;-)


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 6:33 pm
Posts: 282
djm wrote:
If the brakes are rubbing and the bearings are full of sand; yes, it can be attributed to the bike. Otherwise? No! ;-)


:beerchug:


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 3:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 6:02 am
Posts: 3239
Location: On the bike
Image


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_je ... bow_jersey

_________________
"Marginal gains are the only gains when all that's left to gain is in the margins."


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:22 pm
Posts: 1231
Location: London
euan wrote:
sawyer wrote:
Maybe also the hoops ... he had CCUs for the punchclimbs back in the day ... not floppy Eastons.


Which is why they are on Shimano this year...


And yet still no wins this year. :noidea:

_________________
Snacking on carrot sticks - Where did it all go so wrong?
-
Finsbury Park CC


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 12:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:19 pm
Posts: 902
Location: South Carolina
I have to agree with KWalker, it looks like he went smaller just for the sake of going smaller and all things being considered, he would ride worse on that small of a bike.
I do not agree that the bike means nothing, because just as KWalker described, changes that drastic will have adverse effects on how he produces and sustains power, the sustains part is one I have experience with.

HUMP

_________________
Why are the best things in life always the ones you start last?


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 7:17 pm
Posts: 556
Seriously? You guys think a pro of any level, with power meters, heart rate monitors, and thousands upon thousands of miles in the legs, is going to change everything for the fun of it? Come on. He did it because it felt better.
His lack of results come down to a lot of circumstances outside of his bike fit!

_________________
Casati Vola SLi and Dolan Preffisio
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=108931" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;"
btompkins0112 wrote:
It has the H2 geo......one step racier than a hybrid bike


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:19 pm
Posts: 902
Location: South Carolina
My initial thought is not about bike fit, it is about bike size, they are two independent things. You can have the same bike fit on three different bike sizes. That being said, each of those bikes can perform differently.

That is what I was trying to ask and convey with the post, not bike fit.

HUMP

_________________
Why are the best things in life always the ones you start last?


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:19 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:59 pm
Posts: 855
Location: Ruidoso, NM
HUMP DIESEL wrote:
Despite standing at 1.83m (6ft) tall, Gilbert rides a rather diminutive 50cm frame with a 535mm effective top tube length – something no fitter in their right mind would do for a typical cyclist of the same height. As usual, though, it's all about head tube length for these guys. In this case, the top of Gilbert's bar sits more than 12cm below the top of his saddle. To get the reach he wants, Gilbert then has to run a 140mm-long stem slammed atop the headset.


Sounds about like me and my bike. I ride a 54cm frame with a slammed 140mm -17 stem to get 14cm of drop. And I'm 53 with an injured back.

Once you learn to relax your lower back, the limiting factor to getting low is interference between your quads and chest at the top of the stroke... and being able to see where you are going. You don't need to be very flexible. In the old days the riders just bent their arms in the drops to achieve this (like below), but I like having more options... hoods+bar tops with bent arms, or drops with arms less bent. Climbing and standing feel fine, so I don't see any reason to raise the bars.

Before I learned to relax my back, I was on 57 and 58s. There is nothing weird about how the small frame handles. A little more weight on the front wheel, but that is a good thing.

Image

_________________
formerly rruff...


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 3:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Posts: 4126
Location: Natovi Landing
I'm not convinced bike size per - as opposed to contact points - would have a bigger effect than the combined effect of:

- different frame
- different components, especially wheels

Sounds crazy as it's all top-end stuff, but then obviously psychology is crucially important in competition, and trusting and liking the kit you win on, and conversely hating the stuff you get beaten on, is not unknown.

_________________
----------------------------------------
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!! :thumbup:


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 3:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:19 pm
Posts: 902
Location: South Carolina
sawyer wrote:
I'm not convinced bike size per - as opposed to contact points - would have a bigger effect than the combined effect of:

- different frame
- different components, especially wheels

Sounds crazy as it's all top-end stuff, but then obviously psychology is crucially important in competition, and trusting and liking the kit you win on, and conversely hating the stuff you get beaten on, is not unknown.


I can second that, been in that situation before, and if you get it in your head that the bike is SH--! then it is, no matter what anyone tells you.

HUMP

_________________
Why are the best things in life always the ones you start last?


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 3:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 5:19 am
Posts: 890
Personally, I will blame my poor performance on the equipment any time I get a chance :)


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:30 pm
Posts: 1936
hasbeen wrote:
Seriously? You guys think a pro of any level, with power meters, heart rate monitors, and thousands upon thousands of miles in the legs, is going to change everything for the fun of it? Come on. He did it because it felt better.
His lack of results come down to a lot of circumstances outside of his bike fit!

+1

A poor fit could, in theory, significant affect performance.
But within the realm of very experienced professionals, with well-funded teams, mechanics, trainers, power meters, etc, there is no way to blame anything about the bicycle anything short of an actual equipment breakage or malfunction.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 5319
Location: Bay Area
Not true whatsoever. There are lots of instances of bike fits hampering pros in terms of causing injury and reducing power output. A bad fit can result in a significant loss of pedaling efficiency for some people.

_________________
Don't take me too seriously. The only person that doesn't hate Froome.
Gramz
Strava


Top
   
Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 9:03 pm 


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. So, the off-season has been all Di2 and E-tap... FSA, Rotor?

in Road

FreaK

10

1008

Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:01 pm

wingguy View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cyclocross and Road season

in Training

RazorL

5

721

Wed Jan 27, 2016 10:28 am

istigatrice View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Said goodbye to my 3 season drivetrain...

in Road

mdeth1313

12

1508

Fri Jun 10, 2016 5:13 am

Rick View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Selecting between an Aero Road bike vs a Time Trial bike?

in Road

THUNDERHORSE

9

1570

Mon Aug 15, 2016 12:36 am

fabriciom View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Upgraded to a new bike, and now I want to upgrade my old bike. What to do?

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

joshuagull

17

901

Fri Jul 29, 2016 2:22 am

gravity View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited