Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Thu Dec 08, 2016 9:51 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:26 am
Posts: 2056
Location: Atlanta, GA, US
Including a nice shout-out to forum member djconnel:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/fri ... -efficient

_________________
My Bikes

My Photoblog


Top
   
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:17 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2013 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7917
Location: San Francisco, CA
That's cool. Issue is I did my calibration based on old Spicer data, which I tried to fit. The FrictionFacts data are so much better. I should recalibrate my model to those. I'd actually slightly overestimated the benefit. The major benefit in the test isn't 15-teeth versus 11-teeth, but rather how bad the Dura-Ace pulleys are relative to everything else. Once you get down to quality 11-tooth pulleys, the further advantage of going up to 15 is relatively small. But on this forum we're all about small differences, and I admit to being seriously tempted. I had liked the Dark Albert version, but it turns out Berner's design has more advantage than simply larger pulleys, so Berner seems a solid solution. And there's no denying the bling factor.

It will be interesting to see if Berner gets backup up on orders from the quantitative validation.

Basic model was factors which affect loss:
1. chain tension on the upward, tensioned path
2. chain tension on the downward, low-tension path (efficient derailleurs minimize this)
3. chain speed
4. chain bending angle
5. pulley rotation rate
6. pulley bearing friction
7. chain bending friction

Large pulleys reduce 5 and 4.
Large chainrings & cogs (same ratio) increase 3 but reduce 1 and 4.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Bigger cogs or more training?

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Training

MiddMan

19

2240

Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:43 am

cmcdonnell View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. What bikes look good in 'bigger' sizes?

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

jmaccyd

15

960

Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:00 am

speedyvelo1 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Switching rear derailleur pulleys from 11t to 13t - is it possible?

in Road

alcatraz

1

289

Wed Oct 12, 2016 8:03 am

Marin View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSNbot Media and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited