Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Tue Sep 27, 2016 4:57 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Author Message
 Post subject: An analysis of drop
PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:11 pm
Posts: 477
Location: Tucson, AZ
After reading James Huang's pro bike review of Philipe Gilbert's SLR01, I started crunching some numbers. I believe I've found Huang's indignation to be misplaced and mistaken as evidenced by his own previous reviews of Gilbert's Canyon prior to joining BMC. To wit:

Gilbert's 2013 SLR01:
Size 50, Stack/reach 530/378
535mm TT + 140mm -6* stem = 675mm total reach
Setback 59mm, tip of saddle to handelbars 581mm
Drop 122mm

Gilbert's 2011 Aeroad:
Size 56, stack/reach 555/396
560mm TT + 120mm -6* stem = 680mm total reach
Setback 75mm, tip of saddle to handlebars 587mm
Drop 115mm

Gilbert reduced his total reach by 5mm, dropped his bars 7mm, and moved 16mm closer to the BB. In other words, despite a 25mm difference in stack height, his position on the Team Machine differs at most 16mm from that of his larger Aeroad. The magic of a 6* stem angle! Had he replicated his BMC position on his Canyon by reducing his spacer stack and using a 115mm stem or some handlebars with shorter reach, Huang would likely have kept his mouth shut. Instead he used Gilbert's bike as a springboard to soapbox SlamThatStem. :thumbsdown:

To be honest, he doesn't look any different on two bikes either. Hunched over and slogging, as usual.

Image vs Image

And now, another analysis of pro averages:

Image

And a link for djconnel: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1JPD57r2HyrV1IxUGZtNTVWcGM/edit?usp=sharing


Top
   
 Post subject: An analysis of drop
Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 6:02 pm 


Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: An analysis of drop
PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 6:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:40 am
Posts: 562
Location: Switzerland
it does make sense that his drop has increased though, he's grown taller by 1 cm since 2011!


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: An analysis of drop
PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:11 pm
Posts: 477
Location: Tucson, AZ
A quick disclaimer: I realize that this is a very amateurish analysis that is probably failing to take into account a number of things re: geometry, but this certainly goes a lot further than Huang's diatribe. Anyway, I'm trying to get the conversation started.

Dan Empfield from Slowtwitch found that pros (or at least the ones from Mediterranean countries) have a drop-to-saddle height at around 11%, so I'm not sure why my average is higher. I based them on Huang's measurements which he seems to get from the team mechanics. Also note the difference between Garmin riders and the rest of the riders on the list with the exception of Hesjedal. Vroomen's "raise the bars" philosophy gives them no choice!


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: An analysis of drop
PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 6:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 1:06 pm
Posts: 55
Nice post !


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: An analysis of drop
PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 5319
Location: Bay Area
Yah a bunch of your seat heights are wrong. The new Ride has Gilbert's seat height much lower.

_________________
Don't take me too seriously. The only person that doesn't hate Froome.
Gramz
Strava


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: An analysis of drop
PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 7:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:11 pm
Posts: 477
Location: Tucson, AZ
Doing my best with the source I used. Care to contribute? The way Gilbert seems to switch between an Arione and a classic Flite might also skew height measurements.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: An analysis of drop
PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7899
Location: San Francisco, CA
Nice post (and thanks for the data link)! So Horner is the fatty master in the crowd. I felt like a slacker after yesterday 3D Bike Fit took me to 8 cm drop with 72 cm BB-to-seat-top.

Horner on hoods:
Image

Ryder (drop winner):
Image

Wow -- Ryder's back looks as if it's going to break in half.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: An analysis of drop
PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 5319
Location: Bay Area
Don't have time to contribute- but RIDE's pro bike features will ad like 16 bikes to that list. Just re-google search as some of the others off the top of my head don't seem right.

_________________
Don't take me too seriously. The only person that doesn't hate Froome.
Gramz
Strava


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: An analysis of drop
PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 7:09 pm
Posts: 626
Ryder looks like he is bending at the back/using back flexibility to manage the drop vs. Rotating the pelvis and hips, not going to get into it more but that seems to be a possible reason for the painful looking back bend

_________________
Looks like I made a new 90 Proof friend


Top
   
 Post subject: An analysis of drop
PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:35 pm
Posts: 2066
Location: Geneva
I thought the same to dig up Gilbert's Canyon measurements after that piece cause he never looked anywhere near extreme position wise on it. He does look worse on the bmc, cramped.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: An analysis of drop
PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 10:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:43 pm
Posts: 333
Maybe his preference is a bit short versus long. I know that is my preference. I think Horner is more in tune to his body and able to shake stereotypical bike set ups to maximize his comfort. Ryder's set up looks to maximize the low, areo position and not hood riding. Disclaimer, this is me writing my thoughts :-)


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: An analysis of drop
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:26 am
Posts: 2019
Location: Atlanta, GA, US
I have been collecting published data on pro's bikes for a few years now. What I have found is there seems to be a somewhat decent correlation between rider height vs. saddle height and reach to handlebars, especially when you take into account variations due to possible measurement errors and errors in published rider heights (people tend to be shorter than they think, usually). That said, drop tends to be more scattered, centered around 12 cm or so, and is not really dependent on rider height.

_________________
My Bikes

My Photoblog


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: An analysis of drop
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 2:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 1672
Like us I believe that even the Pro's get it wrong, just because it feels or looks right doesn't mean it's efficient or theoretically correct....

_________________
"It never gets easier, you just go faster..." - Greg Lemond

"I enjoy climbing...I enjoy seeing people disappear behind me." - Robert Millar


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: An analysis of drop
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 8:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 10:24 am
Posts: 599
Wingnut wrote:
Like us I believe that even the Pro's get it wrong, just because it feels or looks right doesn't mean it's efficient or theoretically correct....


I disagree. I think the most important thing is first you ride in a position that feels right, and then the body is very good at adapting to that position and becoming efficient in it. I know that riding a different shaped bike feels weird at first - you can't pedal smoothly or lay down power correctly - but you can often get used to it eventually right? I'm not saying you can get used to anything, sure there are things that end up being mistakes for you.

That's what I find with most stuff on the forums, when people argue about optimum seat height, crank length, handlebar width etc etc... At the end of the day you have people who swear by this and swear by that. Doesn't anyone take home the message that it's about what you've become used to? 165mm cranks may well work for someone just as well as 180mm cranks work for someone else.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: An analysis of drop
Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 8:44 am 


Top
   
 
 Post subject: Re: An analysis of drop
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 9:00 am 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1980
Location: NoVA/DC
If the cranks were behind my ears, no amount of time will get me to produce efficient power. You have an adapted maximum power in any position, but one position (or a range, or even two ranges) is better than others. An optimum, if you will. And pros can get caught up in peer pressure, position fashion, etc. They are still mostly human, after all.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. End of Race Analysis

in Training

RyanH

13

835

Sun Mar 13, 2016 3:09 am

RyanH View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Aero Drop Bars

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

campbellrae

35

4935

Sun Apr 03, 2016 9:15 am

muntos View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Ritchey Swisscross 54 price drop

in For sale - Pictures are mandatory 22-3-13

toride

0

316

Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:41 am

toride View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. FS: Fizik Arione R3 *price drop*

in For sale - Pictures are mandatory 22-3-13

emorydptt

0

120

Sat Sep 17, 2016 9:01 pm

emorydptt View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Flat top compact drop bar advice

in Road

Devon

11

638

Wed Mar 16, 2016 12:35 pm

audiojan View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSNbot Media, pinoymamba and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited