Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Sun Jan 21, 2018 6:13 pm

All times are UTC+01:00

Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:04 pm 

Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:26 pm
Posts: 271
Location: Norway
tymon_tm wrote:
some competition aspects:
-ban radio communication
-level chances for ALL national teams at WC - be that, four- or five-man teams, whatever works

I agree with the last one, but I tend to dissagree with the common belief that radios makes boring racing. Radio ban =/= exciting racing. In fact, many of the most exciting races the last couple of seasons have been with radio communication. Without radios the controlling teams do not tend to give the breakaways a very long leash and it ends in a sprint finish anyway. It doesn't make that much of a difference.

As long as the race routes are boring and the amount of riders on a team is too large we will have boring racing. Regardless of having radios or not.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:31 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7926
Location: San Francisco, CA
HammerTime2 wins the thread.

Fuji SL/1

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:31 pm 

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 7:42 am 

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 2:10 am
Posts: 347
Ivan wrote:
Thanks for th link !

Completed the survey. In my eyes, the UCI has a huge impact on how bicycles look like and how technological developments are implemented but the UCI doesn't realize this. Banning Obree's truck position, Boardman's lotus bike, ... Not to mention the recumbents. If not for the UCI, I would commute 10 kph faster to my work every day.

That's essentially what I wrote.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:47 pm 

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 6:36 pm
Posts: 43
All government is bad government. Free market cycling all the way! We should have competing "governing bodies."

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:54 pm 

Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:23 am
Posts: 630
Location: Olympic Nat'l Park, WA
djconnel wrote:
HammerTime2 wins the thread.

It's not necessarily a bad governing body per se, it's the deeply corrupt and incompetent leadership.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:08 pm 

Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:20 pm
Posts: 408
Location: Denmark
I wrote alot of stuff. Something that I might get slaughtered for in here. I recommended them to lower the weight limit to 6 kilos. Then I told them to short down the stages to a maximum of 170 km. (Shorter stages. Riders wont get that tired and hopefully more attacks) You have to look at the level of entertainment. Opposite to everyone else in here, I'm happy that UCI are putting restrictions on what is allowed. I don't like the "aero-roadbike boom". The traditional frames handle better, and could bring down the speed a bit. Think about it. It's not getting any better to be a spectator when the peloton is becoming faster. It just takes less time for the riders to pass, and then you can go home. And if the speed isn't that high, then the riders wont get as hurt if it was. They can go nuts on the tt frames instead. Then there are the looks. the kneesocks or compressionsocks, are ugly as f*** same goes for the new Giro skaterhelmet. If they removed all these restrictions we end up looking at a bunch of freaks all desperately trying to gain that small advantage on the others. But lowering the weight limit to 6 won't do that much IMO. They will be able to go faster uphill. I don't see the big problem there.
Now go ahead. Slice me up :wink:

PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 4:43 am 

Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:37 pm
Posts: 946
Location: Northeast USA
Nice little questionnaire. I liked munk's proposed weight limit of 6kg. Even if it's not very future-forward, it's much more in keeping with the industry today. We all know 6.8kg has been a joke for years, but now first time cyclists are rolling out of the shop for their first ride under 6.8kg which makes one wonder what a creme de la creme rider and machine should be. 800+ grams should also help with some of the big names reinvest into R&D for lighter and more efficient designs, which there is little incentive or reward in this rendition of the UCI.

AX Vial Evo: 4970g
Addict SL : 5235g
My Cycling Blog
Strava: Wayward Cyclist

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. The obvious weight points to reduce ?

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road




Sat Jul 22, 2017 2:21 am

squid046 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Alright, how to reduce weight for Tarmac Sworks sl6 disc

in Road




Fri Dec 15, 2017 10:01 am

L3X View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. weight limit for carbon wheels

in Everything wheels




Wed Aug 09, 2017 11:08 pm

Calnago View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Enve Classic 45 Clincher weight limit

in Everything wheels




Tue Jan 31, 2017 7:24 pm

Alpine318is View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Is there a weight limit for Fulcrum Racing Zero Carbon wheels?

in Everything wheels




Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:15 am

martinko View the latest post

All times are UTC+01:00

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AJS914 and 7 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited