How much does the bike matter?

Questions about bike hire abroad and everything light bike related. No off-topic chat please

Moderator: Moderator Team

AllAboutTheEngine
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:08 pm
Location: London

by AllAboutTheEngine

Fun question.

If you had to estimate as a percentage - how much do you think the bike matters in terms of overall performance of the rider?

Lets say the mimimum bike we are talking about is something like a ~£500 entry level specialized road bike with basic shimano or similar (so no old ladies bikes etc). All the way up to the most weenied high-spec carbon frames kitted out with top-end wheels.

serbelo
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 6:31 am

by serbelo

For Aerodynamics they say bike is just 30% and the rest rider position.
Cervelo R2.5
Cervelo P2c
Cervelo R3
Parlee Z3
Parlee TT

by Weenie


thisisatest
Shop Owner
Posts: 1980
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Location: NoVA/DC

by thisisatest

That's basically the aero difference between a rider with bike and a rider with no bike at all.
Difference between a poor bike aerodynamically and a very aero bike is a couple percent. Rider position from upright to a low tuck is huge. Weight, well weight only greatly affects changes of speed, the bike, like with aerodynamics, is a small part of the mass of the whole system.
Rolling and mechanical resistance- the worst tires can dissipate more than twice the energy that the best tires do. Bearings, more so. Not so much from bearing material, or even smoothness of surfaces, I'm referring to alignment and preload as the dominant factors there. Chain and other drivetrain parts, as long as we're talking about a chain drive system, I don't see much of anything gained from best to worst. chain drive systems are inherently very low drag.
comparing the entry level Allez with an SWorks Tarmac, positioning and such being equal, it turns out that from point A to point B, times will be very, very close. in a race, the better bike will likely shft smoother for a longer period of time, in key tactical moments the cheaper bike's shifting may let you down. The cheap no-name brake pads may require earlier braking into a corner, and the hard compound, stiff casing tires won't grip as hard when you start leaning it over. So time is more likely to start adding up.
note that the inexpensive stuff, tires, brake pads, (and good pedals and shoes and a dialled fitting) would make the biggest difference.

User avatar
elviento
Posts: 1235
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Location: In the industry
Contact:

by elviento

Questions like this are inherently difficult to answer, as people ride for different reasons -- pros are after different things than the dentist (no offense, just an expression). Even some pros are after different things than other pros. A sprinter will be pretty pissed on a noodly bike.

To equipment geeks like me, the bike is pretty important. However for some people it could well be a negligible element and I wouldn't be surprised.

If we have to assume the typical Cat 3/4 amateur racer, I'd say 25%-30%. The rest is training, neutrition, and MOST IMPORTANTLY, NATURAL TALENT.
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal

sawyer
Posts: 4459
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Location: Natovi Landing

by sawyer

Training would be way above natural talent for most 3/4s. Most of us are nowhere near full potential and it's the limits of time and motivation to train that are greatest.

Crap bike can get you dropped, in which case it makes a big difference. Rolling along in the pack - not much difference unless tyres are rubbish.
----------------------------------------
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!! :thumbup:

User avatar
Tapeworm
Posts: 2585
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:39 am

by Tapeworm

elviento wrote:... A sprinter will be pretty pissed on a noodly bike...


What feels noodly, and what actually is robbing power are two different things. Track sprinters of old still went exceptionally fast on "noodly" bikes.
"Physiology is all just propaganda and lies... all waiting to be disproven by the next study."
"I'm not a real doctor; But I am a real worm; I am an actual worm." - TMBG

User avatar
Tinea Pedis
Posts: 8416
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Location: Geelong
Contact:

by Tinea Pedis

Joel Calderon won this years Tour of the Philippines on a Giant which had 105 and was a carbon/alu mix frame. Beating my team mate, whose bike was worth at least 5 times his. Not amazing wheels and average tyres.

I'd say that should speak for itself really.


MOST IMPORTANTLY, NATURAL TALENT

Disagree, for the most part.

The rest is training

Agreed, for the most part.

aerozy
Posts: 772
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:48 am
Location: Mountains, Portugal

by aerozy

A more expensive bike will function better for longer (less maintainence). That peace of mind takes you a long way be it in a race or training. Weight will impact performance quite a bit too. Im not such a strong believer that frame aerodynamics will have any significant impact even though I have two aero bikes :) Its more that it looks fast and that pscicological BS seems to matter to me :mrgreen:
Sunny cycling holidays in Portugal @ Cherry Cottage Vintage B&B

User avatar
fa63
Posts: 2226
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 7:26 am
Location: Atlanta, GA, US

by fa63

aerozy wrote:A more expensive bike will function better for longer (less maintainence).


I have to disagree with this. I don't have to maintain my Sram Apex group any more than I have to maintain my Sram Red group.

I would say that as long as it fits and everything works like it should, the bike matters very little and falls into the negligible gains category (which is important for pros, but not so much for the rest of us).

Kasparz
Posts: 609
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:17 am
Location: Latvia

by Kasparz

Hahaha, ditto!

More expensive bike - very fragile frame and parts, tyres waer faster, so does drivetrain parts Probably shifters and derailleurs will function longer, but what are we comparing Dura-Ace vs Sora or Ultegra? Ultegra is more or less the same, just a tad heavier, Sora shifters will wear out faster.

Aero advantage is huge, can save lots of watts, but only if you are alone, busting wind and going fast.

User avatar
kgt
Posts: 6717
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Location: Athens, Greece

by kgt

AllAboutTheEngine wrote:If you had to estimate as a percentage - how much do you think the bike matters in terms of overall performance of the rider?

5 %

nathanong87
Resident master of GIF
Posts: 3163
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:44 am
Contact:

by nathanong87

AllAboutTheEngine wrote:If you had to estimate as a percentage - how much do you think the bike matters in terms of overall performance of the rider?


Image

User avatar
HammerTime2
Posts: 5422
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed

by HammerTime2

Of course Armstrong had this nailed. Doping is way more important than the bike.

Tokyo Drifter
Posts: 480
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:28 am

by Tokyo Drifter

The bike is always at fault.

Northoceanbeach
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:12 pm

by Northoceanbeach

Bottom end specialized with Sora vs the tour winner, same rider I'd say 5-10%.

by Weenie


Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post