maquisard wrote:Believe Tyler, Floyd Fairness Fund, Support Kimmage...
No thanks.
Well said sir. Well said. Unfortunately some are blinded and unable to see the truth. Kimmage the cheat doesn't need my money. Let the sheep throw their money away.
Moderators: robbosmans, Moderator Team
maquisard wrote:Believe Tyler, Floyd Fairness Fund, Support Kimmage...
No thanks.
tranzformer wrote:maquisard wrote:Believe Tyler, Floyd Fairness Fund, Support Kimmage...
No thanks.
Well said sir. Well said. Unfortunately some are blinded and unable to see the truth. Kimmage the cheat doesn't need my money. Let the sheep throw their money away.
Frankie - B wrote:We have welcomed a lot of new members in the last few months. which is great in it's own way, but it always come with influences on the climate of the board. One of the things that seems to be a trend that is 'coming and going' is using the quote button when typing a reply. I have found a good example and while I don't want to ridicule members i think it is good to show it.
It is the following. in this topic AddictR1 asks a question and Prendrefeu replies to him. All perfectly normal I hear you say. correct indeed, but what happens next is the most intriguing part. AddictR1 now quotes Prendrefeu and writes his reply under it.
please use the quote button for the special occasion such as reacting to a post 2 or more posts up on the page. This way the forms are easier to read and take less time for the moderators to clean.
many thanks in advance,
The moderators.
Press release: UCI takes decisive action in wake of Lance Armstrong affair wrote:Finally, while continuing strongly to maintain the merits of UCI’s case, the Committee decided to seek to suspend the UCI legal action against journalist Paul Kimmage, pending the findings of the independent Commission. UCI President Pat McQuaid and Honorary President Hein Verbruggen who are individual parties to the case will similarly seek to put their cases on hold.
Tapeworm wrote:I couldn't readily find the information so here are some questions:-
1) who actually controls this fund?
2) what happens to the funds should the action against Kimmage be withdrawn?
3) what happens to the funds should they not all be used?
4) who decides what funds pay for what? Is it only legal fees?
Tapeworm wrote:I don't think anyone, including Brown, actually foresaw how this would pan out... I think a combination of factors probably led to him swindling the money