HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Braze on or clamp on ?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 12:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:00 pm
Posts: 895
Location: Scotland
Just trying to find out which is going to be stiffer and offer better shifting, a braze on front mech with a carbon clamp or a built in clamp on front mech ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 1:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 11:09 am
Posts: 346
I'd say that the forces involved are relatively small and that it doesn't matter at all ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 1:53 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 1128
Location: Toronto
If it's a "braze on" then the stiffness is going to depend on the way the manufacturer has dealt with it.

I note that Campy has had to introduce a stiffening gizmo because on some frames the braze on is not stiff enough to handle their EPS FD.

My view is that a clamp on system is probably more reliable, and offers better adjustability too.

_________________
There's sometimes a buggy.
How many drivers does a buggy have?

One.

So let's just say I'm drivin' this buggy...
and if you fix your attitude you can ride along with me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GekiIMh4ZkM


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 3:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:35 am
Posts: 5020
Location: New York
Always hated the clamp on. It marks up the frame. Braze on! BS on that stiffness bit.
If the frame can't handle a front derailleur then that frame is not worthy of components.

_________________
I never took drugs to improve my performance at any time. I will be willing to stick my finger into a polygraph test if anyone with big media pull wants to take issue. If you buy a signed poster now it will not be tarnished later. --Graeme Obree


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 6:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:25 pm
Posts: 163
Cervelo's "braze ons" come to mind as being particularly awful.

If building up a steel or ti bike, go with braze on. Same if the mount is integrated into a carbon frame's mould. Otherwise, you don't have much choice. Shifting on a clamp-on style front derailer will typically be a little better than using a braze with lightweight adaptor if your rings are problematic. However, I'd wager a braze fd with a parlee or k-edge adaptor would be a bit lighter.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:35 am 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1976
Location: NoVA/DC
Clamp-on derailleurs mount very solidly. If youre going to be using a carbon clamp, however, youre removing the clamp-on derailleur's one possible benefit. Braze benefits mostly revolve on not requiring the seat tube to be one of three round sizes. The seat tube also no longer has to bisect the bb. Many companies pay too little attention to fd mounting stiffness and adjustability, although more and more are waking up.
A side note, why doesnt shimano include the fd support setscrew of di2 derailleurs on mechanical derailleurs? They would certainly be a benefit on some bikes w weak mounts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:31 pm
Posts: 347
Won't dent your CF seat tube w/ a designed-in braze on bracket. (friend's Super Six dented @ FD clamp location)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 9:40 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 11:08 am
Posts: 6294
Location: Urbana, Illinois
I went from a clamp on Record to a braze on using a Parlee carbon adapter. I really can't tell the difference in shifting but it is lighter! :beerchug:

_________________
RESIDENT GRUMPY OLD MAN.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 4:30 pm
Posts: 1568
I don't think it matters much;
But I notice that on quite a few carbon frames, the "braze-on" tab is really a "pop-rivit-on" tab. In those cases I think clamp on would be more reliable and secure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:35 am
Posts: 5020
Location: New York
On my carbon colnago frame the braze on has 4 pop rivets. It not going to go anywhere.

_________________
I never took drugs to improve my performance at any time. I will be willing to stick my finger into a polygraph test if anyone with big media pull wants to take issue. If you buy a signed poster now it will not be tarnished later. --Graeme Obree


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 7376
Location: San Francisco, CA
No brazing torch involvement, so I'll vote for the "integrated clamp", since it's lighter and looks better.

_________________
http://djconnel.blogspot.com/
Fuji SL/1
\


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 6:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:55 am
Posts: 151
socratease wrote:
Cervelo's "braze ons" come to mind as being particularly awful.

If building up a steel or ti bike, go with braze on. Same if the mount is integrated into a carbon frame's mould. Otherwise, you don't have much choice. Shifting on a clamp-on style front derailer will typically be a little better than using a braze with lightweight adaptor if your rings are problematic. However, I'd wager a braze fd with a parlee or k-edge adaptor would be a bit lighter.



Cervelo's pop-rivet braze on hangers are awful. I have one on my slc-sl and it is FLEXY :oops: but my r5 has a molded carbon one that is very stiff and solid feeling :thumbup: .
Like socratease said, braze is lighter in most cases and can be stiffer if done correctly! If you run rotor or other elliptical chainrings, especially in large gearings like 54+, sometimes the braze on hangers don't have enough adjustment however. Same thing if you feel like running CX 36/46 gearing on a road bike (I don't know, just an example that I've tried!) - where the adjustment of the braze on is normally limited.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:35 am
Posts: 5020
Location: New York
I doubt that the 54 chain ring would be a problem for a braze on.
Maybe a 60 tooth.
Also it would not be good to have braze on on ultra thin tubing walls.
For those a clamp is better.

_________________
I never took drugs to improve my performance at any time. I will be willing to stick my finger into a polygraph test if anyone with big media pull wants to take issue. If you buy a signed poster now it will not be tarnished later. --Graeme Obree


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:55 am
Posts: 151
Stella - I experimented with a 53 t rotor ring a while back to a 7800 front d and had to dremel a little material off of the braze on as I couldn't get the derailluer to sit high enough to clear the rings (eliptical, not round)... Can't quite remember what bike it was on - I think my Cervelo scl-sl but not sure. I don't think Sram front d would have this issue as they come with two mounting bolts for the front deraill and thus have a lot more adjust ability.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:05 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:35 am
Posts: 5020
Location: New York
Thanks. My experiences were with round rings only.

_________________
I never took drugs to improve my performance at any time. I will be willing to stick my finger into a polygraph test if anyone with big media pull wants to take issue. If you buy a signed poster now it will not be tarnished later. --Graeme Obree


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Dumb q - clamp to braze on 9000 front derailluer

in Road

432r

2

384

Sat Mar 29, 2014 10:50 pm

432r View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Red 22 Front Derailleur - braze on - $45

in For sale - Pictures are mandatory 22-3-13

BikeNerd2453

0

57

Thu Dec 11, 2014 5:14 pm

BikeNerd2453 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 31.8 mm seat clamp

in Wanted

eliflap-scalpel

0

26

Tue Nov 18, 2014 3:15 pm

eliflap-scalpel View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. procraft fd clamp

in Road

dofman

0

91

Mon Dec 01, 2014 3:21 am

dofman View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. SRM 31.8 PC7 bar clamp...bolt size?

in Road

vlastrada

0

146

Tue Aug 26, 2014 11:45 pm

vlastrada View the latest post


It is currently Sat Dec 27, 2014 2:14 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB