5 8 5 wrote:
How about putting your own "I hate Taylor Phinney" posts in their own thread?
If you're going to start moderating how about beginning with your own posts?
No, that belongs there because its a discussion of pro racing, pro results, etc.
If you think about it the 12+ pages of doping that you complained about is probably the single longest stretch of focused discussion the Pro Cycling thread has ever had.
Not true whatsoever. Doping was discussed there before, but the page often had very long discussions and just went to shit earlier this season. Its probably because a lot of the contributors stopped posting and because we're at a point in the season where not much new is happening, but the discussion is not focused.
This is the average argument:
"So and so is doping. They're riding too fast. Lance doped so you can't test anyone"
"They aren't riding that fast, compare to old times."
"Yah, but I think they're doping because many pro cyclists doped in the past decade."
"I don't think Wiggins is doping, but XXXX surely is".
Its moronic and contributes nothing. If you want discuss doping, why people might be, or evidence thereof then do it here. No one has any definitive proof of ANYTHING and have filled 12 pages with tautological b/s. There's a reason the Lance doping thread was created and is now at 20+ pages, feel free to turn this into that.
Don't take me too seriously. GramzStrava