USADA Banned Armstrong new Doping Allegations

Questions about bike hire abroad and everything light bike related. No off-topic chat please

Moderator: Moderator Team

maquisard
Posts: 1736
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:51 pm
Location: France

by maquisard

Hard to look at Skins decision to bring a case against the UCI as anything more than a very cynical PR move...

Don't buy Skins

by Weenie


worstshotever
Posts: 573
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 10:07 pm

by worstshotever

What are Skins?

I guess I could google but don't want to.

User avatar
swinter
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 2:27 am
Location: Grosse Pointe, MI

by swinter

compression wear.

I started to read the president's blog on the suit, but got turned off after the first couple of sentences.

if someone else has the patience to read it, let us know if there was any there there.
"I can't understand why people are frightened by new ideas. I'm frightened of old ones." -- John Cage

http://weightweenies.starbike.com/phpBB ... 928#126928

Mr.Gib
Posts: 3010
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:12 pm
Location: eh?

by Mr.Gib

artray wrote:http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/skins-launch-dollar-2-million-law-suit-against-uci-over-handling-of-anti-doping-fight" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This ain't good . The Armstrong doping was years ago .It's as though he won the last tour .


But the full evidence has only now come to light.

As for whether it is a cynical pr move maybe, but fact is if another party through negligence causes damage to your property (in this case brand image) than you may have a claim.

The only thing I see wrong with the suit is the limited chance of recovery from the UCI. A bad investment from a business point of view.
wheelsONfire wrote: When we ride disc brakes the whole deal of braking is just like a leaving a fart. It happens and then it's over. Nothing planned and nothing to get nervous for.

sawyer
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Location: Natovi Landing

by sawyer

Unless there was some reassurance to Skins from the UCI that the period 1999-2006 was cleaned up then this is totally groundless. The fact LA rode and cheated post Skins entry into the market isn't really relevant as his name was made prior to that, and they're talking here about reptutational damage.
----------------------------------------
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!! :thumbup:

maquisard
Posts: 1736
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:51 pm
Location: France

by maquisard

I'm planning on suing Skins regarding the benefits of compression garments. :thumbup:

http://adisonline.com/sportsmedicine/Ab ... ent.3.aspx

User avatar
djconnel
Posts: 7926
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA
Contact:

by djconnel

They damage to the sport is now, whether or not Armstrong's wins were during Skin's involvement.

My read on the suit isn't that they expect damages, although they briefly say they do. The main focus is on McQuaid and Verbuggen must go. And I completely agree.

If McQuaid and Verbuggen are tossed, and real change is observed to be implemented, the I believe Skins considers the suit successful.

It's sponsors who have the real power in cycling, and they are the ones who are best able to apply the true muscle to take Verbruggen and McQuaid down.

sawyer
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 7:45 pm
Location: Natovi Landing

by sawyer

@dj - absolutely the damage is now, but equally if Skins entered into the bargain in 2008 thinking the UCI had sorted out doping (presumably at most from that point onwards given 2007's events!!) , they can hardly complain that doping with a major reputational impact has been uncovered pre-dating 2008 ... unless the UCI gave explicit "there are no more skeletons in the cupboard" type assurances.
----------------------------------------
Stiff, Light, Aero - Pick Three!! :thumbup:

User avatar
elviento
Posts: 1235
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Location: In the industry
Contact:

by elviento

They don't have a case... UCI doesn't owe any kind of duty to the sponsors, nor did they take any action to induce the sponsors to enter the sport.

That said, it's hard to side with UCI for what they have done to the sport though.
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal

CarlosFerreiro
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:41 pm
Location: Shetland, Scotland

by CarlosFerreiro

artray wrote:This was my point "USADA where willing to let results stand even though they know he won them doped ."
Nothing to do with Armstrongs guilt, You keep reading things that are not there.

The way I understood it was USADA saying that cooperation from LA would have meant that the 8 year SOL would apply, or at least that USADA would not push for extension on conspiracy grounds, and it would therefore only be the 2004 and 2005 tours that would still fall within that SOL period.
But I can't remember if I read that, or just came to that conclusion myself.

User avatar
majklnajt
Posts: 3681
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 6:40 pm
Location: Lenart, Slovenia EUROPE

by majklnajt

You`ve read that.

monkeyburger
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:45 pm
Location: Bali, Indonesia

by monkeyburger

A picture is worth a thousand words. A buddy of mine in Austin snapped this yesterday...

broken lance.JPG


monkeyburger
...finding my inner Onoda-kun...

artray
Posts: 1365
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:08 pm

by artray

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/obree-c ... hum-ocracy" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Telling it like it is .

User avatar
djconnel
Posts: 7926
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA
Contact:

by djconnel

Some interesting EPO-transfusion-threshold power estimates.

Estimate is Lance 3.0 went from 5.7 ( VO2 max ml/min/kg of 83 ) to 6.2 W/kg with doping ( 90 ml/min/kg ) within biological passport constraints. Lance 2.0 could get to 6.7 W/kg with doping ( EPO 16 gm/dL) + transfusions (2.37 liters) for a VO2 max = 97.5 ml/kg/min . Quickie 500 ml of saline is good to reduct HCT% from 50.5% to 49.7%.

by Weenie


User avatar
HammerTime2
Posts: 5422
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:43 pm
Location: Wherever there's a mountain beckoning to be climbed

by HammerTime2

Hold on to your hats folks. Just when we thought it couldn't get any bigger, comes the shocking word which will rock the professional cycling world to its very foundation. David George (who the heck is that?), a USPS teammate of Lance Armstrong in 1999-2000, has been caught doping with EPO Former Armstrong teammate fails test . Who's next, the assistant shoeshine boy?
Last edited by HammerTime2 on Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

Locked
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post