HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 3:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 1280
Although this is a forum where there will always be contentious opinions and ideas (some of which I take umbrage to)...it's a good reminder that some of us are a little harsh (myself included) with our replies and opinions...

_________________
"It never gets easier, you just go faster..." - Greg Lemond

"I enjoy climbing...I enjoy seeing people disappear behind me." - Robert Millar


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 3:18 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 5:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 10:54 am
Posts: 1396
Location: Melbourne, Australia
bones wrote:
Namecalling of any sort receives disciplinary action. Obscenity, profanity, also should receives same punishment. These are specific rules, not general ones. The problem is with the generalized interpretations because what is rude to you might not be rude to another. So, we must stick to the specifics. Someone calls anyone a troll or any other name, they should get banned. It clearly states such in the terms of agreement prohibiting namecalling, profanity, obscene language, etc.


Seriously? What word will you be allowed to use when it appears someone is intentionally posting merely to get a reaction? :roll:

I agree people should take a deep breath, reread their posts and ask the question if they would speak that way if they were face to face before hitting submit. But banning someone for suggesting another person is trollling might be going abit far?

_________________
http://climbinglama.blogspot.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 5:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:49 pm
Posts: 715
Location: Netherlands
I completely agree...

_________________
Happy Trails !!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 6:28 am 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 8:17 am
Posts: 5820
Location: Drenthe, Holland
Dalai wrote:
Seriously? What word will you be allowed to use when it appears someone is intentionally posting merely to get a reaction? :roll:


If some one is intentionally posting to receive an aggressive reaction just try yo ignore the bad behavior and let the moderators know by clicking the exclamation button bottom right of that post. (please see the link to the small tutorial I made earlier on page 1)

_________________
'Tape was made to wrap your GF's gifts, NOT hold a freakin tire on.'

Follow me on twitter. I try to be interesting ;)
On Facebook!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 9:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 3:26 am
Posts: 388
Location: Sydney, Australia
bones wrote:
Namecalling of any sort receives disciplinary action. Obscenity, profanity, also should receives same punishment. These are specific rules, not general ones. The problem is with the generalized interpretations because what is rude to you might not be rude to another. So, we must stick to the specifics. Someone calls anyone a troll or any other name, they should get banned. It clearly states such in the terms of agreement prohibiting namecalling, profanity, obscene language, etc.


Really?


Personal message from bones about 3 days ago:

bones wrote:
Stupid Aussie


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 9:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 2:28 pm
Posts: 380
bones wrote:
Namecalling of any sort receives disciplinary action. Obscenity, profanity, also should receives same punishment. These are specific rules, not general ones. The problem is with the generalized interpretations because what is rude to you might not be rude to another. So, we must stick to the specifics. Someone calls anyone a troll or any other name, they should get banned. It clearly states such in the terms of agreement prohibiting namecalling, profanity, obscene language, etc.


bones wrote:
Bull. I know your game. Your posts factual? Yeah, factual in a way that supports the stuff you sell.


Tinea Pedis wrote:
bones - enough please. First and last warning. This has already caused one thread to get locked


Need I go on?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 11:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:47 pm
Posts: 3553
Location: Pittsburgh
Lol I like this post more than some of the bike posts.

_________________
RUEGAMER 5.21kg, 11.48lbs

CRUMPTON 4.40kg, 9.70lbs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 11:57 am 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Posts: 7309
Location: Geeeelong!
Guys, please :doh:

_________________
http://www.nicksquillari.com.au Forum Jedi


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 6:35 am
Posts: 5020
Location: New York
Let he who is without sin, cast the first stone. :D

I don't think anyone here can do this.

_________________
I never took drugs to improve my performance at any time. I will be willing to stick my finger into a polygraph test if anyone with big media pull wants to take issue. If you buy a signed poster now it will not be tarnished later. --Graeme Obree


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 1:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:47 pm
Posts: 3553
Location: Pittsburgh
Tinea Pedis wrote:
Guys, please :doh:


LOL I like how a "Let's not be rude" topic turns into name calling. :mrgreen:

_________________
RUEGAMER 5.21kg, 11.48lbs

CRUMPTON 4.40kg, 9.70lbs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 3:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 10:38 am
Posts: 414
It is a hard job that the moderators do. I know a moderator personally and have spoke to him on a few occasions. They are unpaid, and most have day jobs. To expect them to take action on a subjective opinion because of one or more users opining on another being rude or being quote-unquote a "troll" is not fair to the moderator.

The terms of service is very objective in nature. Meaning, it takes out alot of subjective opinions. It provides the basis for which all users agree to and the moderators enforce. Subjective opinions like being mean, being rude, even being "trollish" are left out of the terms. However, specific objective criteria are directly spelled out. Things like namecalling, profanity, personal insults, those things are quantifiable actions and not opinions. And they are prohibited by the terms of service. The issue is the people who feel that they are somehow justified in violating these terms because they thought someone was "trolling" for a reaction when it is really unnecessary for them to violate the terms of service in their display of vigilance. Certainly, calmer attitudes must prevail.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 5:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 4:24 am
Posts: 953
I think the mods do an excellent job. I hardly ever see any drama on the forum or dummies quoting pictures over and over. That happens all the time everywhere else.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 7:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:40 pm
Posts: 316
Location: CA
bones i hate to break it to you bud, but you are exactly the kind of user the OP is complaining about. I'll leave it at that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 8:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 3784
Location: Bay Area
Image

_________________
Don't take me too seriously.
Bike
Strava


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 8:01 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 8:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 10:38 am
Posts: 414
billspreston wrote:
bones i hate to break it to you bud, but you are exactly the kind of user the OP is complaining about. I'll leave it at that.


billpreston, you and I both need to do better. We all do. When you start throwing rocks, people throw them back. And what needs to occur is calmer attitudes. Subjective insinuations got us to this point so we have to take a step back and look at how the board can improve. It is still weight weenies. And I think if people get back to the basics with the terms that they initially agreed upon this place can be better.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BdaGhisallo, zulu695 and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. A DIY forum?

in Weight Weenies

Elrey

9

960

Wed Jan 15, 2014 11:10 pm

Tinea Pedis View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. New to the Forum

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

JimWeekend

1

217

Sat Jun 07, 2014 1:03 am

Johnny Rad View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. A bit of forum etiquette

in Weight Weenies

Frankie - B

4

877

Thu Sep 18, 2014 10:07 am

razamoon View the latest post


It is currently Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:01 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB