Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Thu Sep 29, 2016 7:49 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1235
Location: In the industry
I have been playing with the idea of making some new cranks for some time now.

See: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=96497&p=819164&hilit=pushed+cranks+space#p819164

After a few beers with an engineer friend of mine today, I decided to put something together. The moulds seem to be cheaper than those for a frame so hopefully won't tap into grocery money.

In fact I already have a few ideas bouncing in my head, but then I discovered to my dismay that I do not know anything about bearing standards at all.

Therefore, I'd appreciate any pointers in that area.

To be more specific, I am trying to figure out what is the thinnest bearing that will fit a PF30 (ID 46mm) shell (to find out what size spindle can go through). GOing to a bigger frame BB standard will be a much bigger undertaking.

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal


Top
   
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:56 pm 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 7:18 pm
Posts: 613
47x35 (6807) ball bearing
42x35 (HK3516) needle bearing

As the needle bearing is not really an option, I would try to gain a mm in the BB shell to use the 6807 bearing

_________________
http://cds-0.blogspot.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 4:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1235
Location: In the industry
Thanks, what do you exactly mean by "gain"? TO file some material out of an existing frame?

If this means the frame can't go back to fitting regular PF30 BB, then I might as well go with a bigger BB shell in the frame.

Epic-o wrote:
47x35 (6807) ball bearing
42x35 (HK3516) needle bearing

As the needle bearing is not really an option, I would try to gain a mm in the BB shell to use the 6807 bearing

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 4:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 7:18 pm
Posts: 613
Yes, you will need some sort of spacer to be able to fit regular PF30.

I haven't seen any crankset that uses needle bearings but it can be a good solution. The main problem is that it weighs 10gr more than a roller one.

_________________
http://cds-0.blogspot.com


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:00 am 
Offline
Shop Owner

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 1980
Location: NoVA/DC
i'd go with a needle bearing on the drive side and a radial or deep groove bearing on the left side. better load capacity on the higher loaded side, with side load management done by the left bearing. but that's just me.
i personally wouldnt bother making something bigger than 30mm, i would focus on improvements elsewhere.
might want to check out what Praxis is using on their 35mm spindle. probably the 47mm od bearing, which is why theirs is outboard.

another idea is, going with the 35mm spindle, mount the needle bearing inboard but the left radial bearing outboard. that's the way sweet wings cranks did it in the distant past. with the right bearing inboard, it leaves you the room to have the spider. if right spider width=left outboard cup width, that would be very convenient for symmetry.


Top
   
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:00 am 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 7:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:09 pm
Posts: 1235
Location: In the industry
Thanks for your suggestions. I am currently pondering over a carbon spindle so it will definitely have to be bigger than 30. Frankly 30 simply isn't a good size for carbon spindle.

Here is the engineering question -- right now, several parts are jammed in a small cluster, to make everything work, something will have to give. Easiest way is to squeeze the crank arms (then you can have enough room to do outboard, BB86, etc.); if you don't want to squeeze the crank arms, then you would have a huge Q factor, which isn't great; then you could also squeeze the spindle, 24mm, etc., which again, not great for carbon; then you could also squeeze the bearings (apparently not much room to squeeze, plus durability is down the drain).

Here is my problem -- I don't want to give up any of those, which is pushing me towards enlarging the BB shell like Look did, which creates all sorts of compatibility issues, plus the retro types will have a field day.

Eric -- if we are talking about adaptors, then I might just bite the bullet and create something along the lines of the LOOK Zed -- bigger frame shell, and bigger spindle. Therefore, I am hoping for a magic bearing that will fit 46mm BB shell and 35~40mm spindle. If not, then I will have to go back to the drawing board.



thisisatest wrote:
i'd go with a needle bearing on the drive side and a radial or deep groove bearing on the left side. better load capacity on the higher loaded side, with side load management done by the left bearing. but that's just me.
i personally wouldnt bother making something bigger than 30mm, i would focus on improvements elsewhere.
might want to check out what Praxis is using on their 35mm spindle. probably the 47mm od bearing, which is why theirs is outboard.

another idea is, going with the 35mm spindle, mount the needle bearing inboard but the left radial bearing outboard. that's the way sweet wings cranks did it in the distant past. with the right bearing inboard, it leaves you the room to have the spider. if right spider width=left outboard cup width, that would be very convenient for symmetry.

_________________
Fast falcons: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3mTPEuFcWk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
www.falcobike.com
Facebook: falcobikeglobal


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. BEARING SIZES for MAVIC SLR 2011

in Everything wheels

kavitator

0

179

Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:06 am

kavitator View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Seeking feedback on New Madone 9.9

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ]

in Road

CanadianBiker

75

8002

Sat Aug 06, 2016 1:16 pm

CanadianBiker View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Seeking advice on which ANT+ sensor suite to get

in Road

WannabeWeenie

1

192

Fri May 13, 2016 4:08 pm

uraqt View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. New wheels, but information needed?

in Road

PLuKE

6

555

Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:10 am

iliedanila View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) Crank sizes

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

Lewski33

19

1288

Tue Oct 13, 2015 11:41 pm

rmerka View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited