HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 72 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:33 pm
Posts: 283
Location: California
When it comes to cycling i'm a bit of a technophobe. Electronic gruppos, gps, computers I would never put on my bike. When I want to ride somewhere new, I look up and write my own queue-sheet (I've never gotten lost, even on long rides). I don't have a powermeter, and don't plan on getting one anytime soon (although it'd be interesting to see what my numbers are). I leave my phone on standby and only use it for emergencies. Maybe I'll wait until gps technology advances a few generations and becomes more affordable, but for now I'm just enjoying riding my bike, and I don't need any batteries.
:beerchug:

_________________
strava / instagram


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:11 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 5:11 pm
Posts: 84
Yeah I agree. Garmin is decent, but way way overpriced and overrated. Just use a regular cycle computer and use your smartphone maps app if you get lost.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 5:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 12:37 am
Posts: 82
Pharmstrong wrote:
nickl wrote:
The point of this is that the technology in the Garmin 810 and in the iPhone are very roughly comparable, and cost very roughly the same amount.


No the point is that in the UK a Garmin 810 is currently retailing for around £450. A modern smartphone like Google's Nexus 4 can be had for £239. The latest in car Garmin Nuvi's are around £150.


CRC has the 800 for £231.74 - as I said: roughly comparable. If you want to save some more, the 500 is £131.31.

The 810 is £326.16 - sure, you are paying extra to have the latest, just as you pay the Apple tax to have an iPhoe 5.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:20 am 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 2:45 pm
Posts: 2455
Location: London, UK
Pharmstrong wrote:
nickl wrote:
The point of this is that the technology in the Garmin 810 and in the iPhone are very roughly comparable, and cost very roughly the same amount.


No the point is that in the UK a Garmin 810 is currently retailing for around £450. A modern smartphone like Google's Nexus 4 can be had for £239. The latest in car Garmin Nuvi's are around £150.

People are evidently falling over themselves to pay over the odds, so Garmin are obliging them. Cycling, the new golf.

The 810 has only been available at limited outlets for a scant 6 weeks, most shops haven't even seen a delivery yet, so it is still going to be full price.

As for the phones, I don't know a single person who buys their phones outright, let alone from ebay, so to quote £239 for the purchase is misleading.

Similarly, the Nuvi comparison is a red herring. An in-car GPS is competing with phone GPS units much more directly than a Garmin Edge of any iteration. Power is not an issue for the phone, function is everything. And it is a pure navigation tool.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 7:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:06 pm
Posts: 30
Location: The Whale's Vagina
Especially in 2013, the question of "why a Garmin?" will become more valid. If you are fine with using your phone, there are plenty of new Bluetooth hr and cadence monitors and corresponding free apps coming to market. The ones I've tested are worthy competitors. If nothing else, the new Garmin offerings are a sign the company is wavering in it's dominance. After a week testing it, I didn't see anything in the new 510 that is truly an upgrade. If anything, the larger size and a touch screen that doesn't always respond well to sweaty, salty hands are reasons to stay away. The OP's questions will only be echoed more as time goes on. But hey, riding bikes is fun, so there's that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 7:17 pm
Posts: 326
ultimobici wrote:
As for the phones, I don't know a single person who buys their phones outright, let alone from ebay, so to quote £239 for the purchase is misleading.

Similarly, the Nuvi comparison is a red herring. An in-car GPS is competing with phone GPS units much more directly than a Garmin Edge of any iteration. Power is not an issue for the phone, function is everything. And it is a pure navigation tool.


The Nexus 4 is £239 direct from Google, not misleading.

I don't know why the Nuvi comparison is a red hearing? They can operate on battery, and they have to a drive a 5" screen. The internals past the screen are of a similar constitution, and they use the same mapping service.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:56 am 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 2:45 pm
Posts: 2455
Location: London, UK
Pharmstrong wrote:
ultimobici wrote:
As for the phones, I don't know a single person who buys their phones outright, let alone from ebay, so to quote £239 for the purchase is misleading.

Similarly, the Nuvi comparison is a red herring. An in-car GPS is competing with phone GPS units much more directly than a Garmin Edge of any iteration. Power is not an issue for the phone, function is everything. And it is a pure navigation tool.


The Nexus 4 is £239 direct from Google, not misleading.
My bad - too early in the morning!

Quote:
I don't know why the Nuvi comparison is a red hearing? They can operate on battery, and they have to a drive a 5" screen. The internals past the screen are of a similar constitution, and they use the same mapping service.
Battery life on the Nuvi is irrelevant as most, if not all the time, it'll be plugged in. It only has to do one thing, navigate, not record speed, distance, HR etc. it has no other function other than to direct you to a destination. It doesn't have to be weatherproof, nor shock resistant, so of course it's cheaper.

Come to think of it, imagine if that £239 Nexus was waterproof & shock resistant. How much bulkier, heavier & more expensive.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 9:03 am
Posts: 292
MarkTwain wrote:
BobSantini wrote:
You can't get a civil response out of their users. They appear to be pissed but they don't say why. Maybe they're just a surly bunch :lol:

But fortunately, the OP is a shining example and the opposite of all of this.

Oh, wait.


The issue was expressed in a post on page one. And you've shown you clearly don't read up (again, as seen with your Belgium thread) or take some time to appreciate what a product can and can not do before getting on the internet to run it down.

I'll all for people asking to get a better idea. But not sprouting misinformation like you are.


Huh? "misinformation"? "Belgium thread"? Do you have any idea what you're talking about or do you just make stuff up? "Clearly don't read up" is clearly ignorant guesswork presumably intended to be insulting.
Here we are on page 5 and apart from pointing to a test in a rude and offensive manner you've had nothing to contribute but insults.
Lets see, Mark Twain, 6 posts. I'm guessing that's an alias for a regular poster who for some reason feels offended about something. Am I right?

_________________
r o y g b i v


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 10:57 pm
Posts: 82
Location: Denver
buttrumpus wrote:
Especially in 2013, the question of "why a Garmin?" will become more valid. If you are fine with using your phone, there are plenty of new Bluetooth hr and cadence monitors and corresponding free apps coming to market. The ones I've tested are worthy competitors. If nothing else, the new Garmin offerings are a sign the company is wavering in it's dominance. After a week testing it, I didn't see anything in the new 510 that is truly an upgrade. If anything, the larger size and a touch screen that doesn't always respond well to sweaty, salty hands are reasons to stay away. The OP's questions will only be echoed more as time goes on. But hey, riding bikes is fun, so there's that.


The GPS radio in an iPhone is nowhere near as accurate as the one in a Garmin. I've never had issues with Garmin data accuracy, but I've seen lots with the iPhone 5 personally and on my mates' setup. Bluetooth is also not optimized around battery life for this application. ANT+ is much more energy efficient as it isn't intended to carry the volume of data Bluetooth does. ANT+ is optimized for the data transfer rates (which are much lower in this application).

"Why a Garmin?" Is a pretty bold statement. I'd counter with "Why an iPhone?" Smartphones are poor bike computers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:51 pm
Posts: 80
BobSantini wrote:
Do you have any idea what you're talking about or do you just make stuff up?

Oh the irony.

Nothing is made up. It's all there, if you looked...

The OP set the tone for the thread, I just carried it on. You ask yourself who set the 'insulting' ball rolling.

After a year or so of lurking, enough was enough and decided to register. As 'far out' as that might seem to you. And I've contributed more than insults, so I guess I can again ask you "Do you have any idea what you're talking about or do you just make stuff up?".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:41 pm 
Offline
in the industry
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 2:45 pm
Posts: 2455
Location: London, UK
My the standards have dropped in WW land.........

2 days in and much of your contribution has been derogatory. The guy made a lighthearted comment, even putting a little :lol: at the end. But instead of taking it in the manner it was so obviously meant, you responded in a derisory manner.

no wonder many longer standing members post less and less......


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:59 pm 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 6:08 am
Posts: 7319
Location: Geeeelong!
And I think this one has run its course. Getting a little too snippy :shock:

_________________
http://www.nicksquillari.com.au Forum Jedi


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 72 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Garmin Virb vs Garmin Virb Elite

in Cycle Chat

ToffieBoi

8

408

Sat Aug 16, 2014 4:17 am

liketoride View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. SRM with Garmin 810

in Training

williamsf1

4

832

Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:17 am

williamsf1 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Garmin 800 vs 510

in Training

myndog

9

1322

Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:52 am

davidalone View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Garmin 500

in Wanted

russianbear

0

41

Sat Aug 30, 2014 10:23 pm

russianbear View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. SRM and Garmin 500

in Wanted

jdp211

0

51

Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:09 pm

jdp211 View the latest post


It is currently Thu Oct 02, 2014 12:15 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB