HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4950 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319 ... 330  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 1:21 am
Posts: 179
Now you guys are just bringing in more things I did not think of, haha. Thank god I didn't place my order yet.

So damn hard to find light tubes with long valve stems that aren't expensive. Talking about light tubes, anyone got recommendations? Also, how are Vittoria Ultralite's?


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 6:56 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 10:21 pm 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 1599
Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
conti supersonic's are pretty reliable but I have taken to using Vittoria latex tubes.

_________________
www.thecycleclinic.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2014 12:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:48 am
Posts: 274
I ride Panaracer r'air (which don't have removable valve cores...), since they roll as good as latex but still hold air for more than 3 hours.

_________________
Carbon is real.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2014 12:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 4:29 am
Posts: 356
Panaracer r'air... me too :=)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:48 am
Posts: 274
Only problem is they don't have removable valve cores, which means sucky extensions.

_________________
Carbon is real.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2014 3:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 1:21 am
Posts: 179
Panaracer tubes seems pretty interesting. Think they'll work fine in a carbon clincher with its partial latex build?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 9:07 pm
Posts: 985
Location: Slovenia---that forest land
Question about pulling spokes and their angle to axle.
Is there any difference in perfect 90degree compare to hub axle?
24 spokes with 2x
Hub with assimetric spoke holes offer shorter spokes but angle of pulling spokes is far from 90degree.
Will be that wheelset less responsive compare to wheelset with perfect 90degree pulling spoke?
Is it just on paper or it can feel in real world too
Thx

_________________
http://kavitec.blogspot.com/

click this! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0m8maAO-m-w


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 8:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:47 pm
Posts: 1806
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA
I've built wheels with really poor pulling angles, using 1x on the DS and 2x on the NDS (for 28h hubs). I can feel a small difference, maybe, between that and the same wheels laced 3x on the DS. Same rim, hub, and make/models of spokes, just different lengths. But it's so small that it could well be in my head. Also I"m a 145lb (66kg) climber not a rider who makes big power. I do ride a lot of very steep climbs however and that's where I maybe feel a small difference if there is one.

That 1x/2x lacing is probably got less bracing angle than whatever it is that you're proposing. The 1x DS spokes eventually pulled through the hub flange so I don't recommend that. You need enough angle so the hub flange is reinforcing the hole in the direction the spokes pull. Especially the DS spokes as they see the highest tension.

Jobst gives the equations to calculate windup for your wheel build. Also the torque transmission from DS to NDS but modern hubs have a much larger diameter body between the flanges than hubs did in his day so I just assume zero loss there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 10:15 pm 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 1599
Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
I do alot of 28 spoke wheels 2x I have tried them 3x and I cannot tell any difference if that helps.

_________________
www.thecycleclinic.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:31 pm
Posts: 2
Hi, I've read about 80% of this thread at it has been really helpful. I wanted to get some opinions on these two wheel builds

Option A: About 1300g
Alpha 340's 24/28
BHS SL71
BHS SL210
Sapim Lasers
14mm Alloy Nipples
Radial front, 2x DS and NDS

Option B: About 1400g
Pacenti SL23 20/24
BHS SL71
BHS UL190
Sapim Lasers
14mm Alloy Nipples
Radial front, 2x DS and NDS

I'm 125lbs, I like climbing out of the saddle, and the roads I ride on are descent. Also, I plan on going tubeless and this will be my everyday wheel set. My current wheel set is DT Swiss 1850's, I've never broken a spoke and after 7000mi they are still true.

What option would be stiffer? I'm concernd that the Alpha build with the Bhs hub might be a bit soft, because of the DS flange spacing. The pacenti seems to get great reviews but would 20/24 make the build not stiff enough? I know 16:8 is an option but because this is my first build I want to pick a standard lacing pattern. I would like to keep the bulld between 1300-1400g if it is possible. The Pacenti build is about $30 more but I don't think that matters. Also, what would the pros and cons be if I decided to go for the ul66 front hub?

Any thoughts? Thanks for the help and I apologize if this has all been covered before.
Owen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 9:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:47 pm
Posts: 1806
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA
The BHS hubs have fairly wide flange spacing, especially the NDS. I like the UL66 hubs. The flanges are not as wide but that makes the resulting front wheel's lateral stiffness more in line with the always less stiff rear. I lace them heads in 1x which does make them a little stiffer. It looks funny to some people. The spoke holes on these hubs are countersunk quite a bit. Lacing them heads out leaves the spoke elbows unsupported and they eventually break if laced radial. Lacing the SL71s heads in makes for a very wide hub which may contact some forks at the spoke elbows. The UL66 has four tiny bearings while the SL71 has two larger bearings. I've yet to have any go bad so I can't say how they are to replace. More bearings theoretically has more drag but it's not noticeable.

The SL23s will make a laterally stiffer wheel with everything else equal. I don't know if more spokes will have more effect on stiffness than the stiffer rim. I'd personally go with the stiffer rims and fewer spokes but that is based on my experience with other super light clincher rims which had the stiffness of wet noodles.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 1:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:31 pm
Posts: 2
eric wrote:
The BHS hubs have fairly wide flange spacing, especially the NDS. I like the UL66 hubs. The flanges are not as wide but that makes the resulting front wheel's lateral stiffness more in line with the always less stiff rear. I lace them heads in 1x which does make them a little stiffer. It looks funny to some people. The spoke holes on these hubs are countersunk quite a bit. Lacing them heads out leaves the spoke elbows unsupported and they eventually break if laced radial. Lacing the SL71s heads in makes for a very wide hub which may contact some forks at the spoke elbows. The UL66 has four tiny bearings while the SL71 has two larger bearings. I've yet to have any go bad so I can't say how they are to replace. More bearings theoretically has more drag but it's not noticeable.

The SL23s will make a laterally stiffer wheel with everything else equal. I don't know if more spokes will have more effect on stiffness than the stiffer rim. I'd personally go with the stiffer rims and fewer spokes but that is based on my experience with other super light clincher rims which had the stiffness of wet noodles.


Thanks for the reply. Would you advise against the ul66 laced to the sl23, heads in, with 20 spokes? How many spokes and what rim have you laced the ul66 to?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 4:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:47 pm
Posts: 1806
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA
Most of my Ul66 wheels have been laced to XR270s, all 20h. I've laced them radial heads out, heads in and 1x heads in.
I can't tell a difference between heads in radial and 1x as far as stiffness is concerned.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:04 pm 
Offline
Formerly known as wassertreter

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:08 am
Posts: 2017
Location: Pedal Square
Want to build a proper (though mid 90s youngtimer) steel MTB again, after quite a few years. Since I mostly only ride MTB alone and for fun and diversion (offroad hill repeats and such), I'm fine with a fully rigid bike.

28h hubs and rims (Velocity A23) are sorted already, now my question is, would using Ti spokes give me an even more supple ride? Pattern will be either 2x or 3x all around. I don't care for stiffness really and prefer some suppleness in the right places, hence will be using a steel frame with non-oversized handlebars and supple tyres. The wheels should not require constant truing, though.

It's going to be a Steel+Ti themed build, so unless you recommend against Ti spokes, I'd be quite tempted.

_________________
Bikes: Raw Ti, 650b flatbar CX


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:04 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 4:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:12 am
Posts: 238
That seems lime an awfully narrow rim for MTB, assuming by "supple" tires you will be running 2.2"+. I feel like my Stans Arch rims are on the narrow side for the big 2.3" tires I have on my steel MTB now; am tempted to build a Stans Flow wheelset or maybe one of these wide carbon rims. Of course in practice the width probably matters a lot less than I am attributing.

I can't comment from experience on the ti spokes. I would guess that you will not be able to tell the difference, certainly not more than dropping a couple psi in your tires. I have never been tempted to build with ti spokes, but am curious what those with experience have to say.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4950 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319 ... 330  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: stevec1975 and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Wheelbuilding - Every 5th spoke too short...

in Road

shinkansen

14

3128

Tue Apr 01, 2014 5:00 am

ProEvoSLTeamHighMod View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. The 'hub help' thread

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Everything wheels

kavitator

20

1416

Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:19 pm

sanrensho View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Not another what wheel thread...

in Everything wheels

peted76

5

487

Mon Sep 29, 2014 1:42 pm

peted76 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Thread title V2.0

in Test

pam

0

256

Sat Mar 08, 2014 2:38 am

pam View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Another Bike fit thread, how does my fit look? Help.

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

plag

26

1541

Tue Oct 21, 2014 7:09 pm

TwiggyTN View the latest post


It is currently Sun Dec 21, 2014 11:24 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB