HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4658 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 ... 311  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 5:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:23 am
Posts: 240
I built my wheels. Going to test them out now. Review coming soon. Thanks again for everyone that helped answer my questions so far.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 5:43 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 10:19 pm 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 1087
Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
Well I think the sapim guage reads too high. I took an DT swiss build up to what the Sapim gauge said was 1200N and it went it a bit wobbly reducing the tension to what the DT Swiss gauge said was 1200N sorted the problem. I have has the same issue with a couple of other rims so I will stick to using the DT Swiss gauge from now on.

_________________
www.thecycleclinic.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 10:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:13 pm
Posts: 26
kimaswan wrote:
khaostik wrote:
Hi,

I'm about to build a pair of carbon tubulars.
I've already bought two http://www.planet-x-bikes.co.uk/i/q/RIPXCAR50/planet-x-carbon-r50-rim planet X 50 mm,
and two hubs from bike hub store:
http://www.bikehubstore.com/SuperLight-Wide-Front-Hub-p/slf78w.htm in 20 holes
http://www.bikehubstore.com/SuperLight-211-p/sl211.htm in 16:8 drilling.

Now I'm about to order the spokes and my problem is the rim ERD. In planet X website they advertise that the ERD is 539.4mm.. but when I measure the internal rim diameter I get 533mm.. Has anyone measure the ERD of this rim?

Best regards,

Filipe Dias

Here is an interesting post to understand how to measure ERD :
http://www.velo-trainer.fr/spip.php?article75
sorry, it's french but I guess you know Google Traduct


I am the author of this page, if some of you are interested I could made a translation.

In addition of the computation of the ERD, you have to correct it with the kind of nipple that you will use. I wrote an article about this few week ago : http://velo-trainer.fr/spip.php?article304

It's in french, but there pictures :wink: :wink: and the correction table is easy to understand.

:wink:

_________________
Webmaster http://velo-trainer.fr and rca-bike.fr


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:38 pm
Posts: 291
The rule for correction varies for different nipple makes, you can't generalise completely.

_________________
Blog: http://thesetbackpost.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm
Posts: 1136
I've been reading with interest about the discrepencies you guys have been finding between different tensionometers as I went through quite an exercise in this last winter. I was experimenting with several sets of identical wheels all using Ambrosio Nemesis rims laced to Campy Record hubs with DT Swiss Comp and/or Revolution spokes. I have both a Park TM-1 and a digital DT Swiss Tensio gauge and was getting significantly different readings from both, the Park reading the higher of the two. My curiosity was getting the best of me so I sent both meters back to the manufacturers for calibration. DT Swiss said the tension was spot on and Park adjusted theirs a bit. Even after factory calibration the readings are still significantly different.

I have a spreadsheet I created which makes quick work of conversion of the readings which I've reproduced for one of my wheels which I purposely built up with a very high tension, perhaps too high. There are two charts, one created using the DT Swiss Tensionometer, and the lower one created using the Park TM-1. I'm curious to see if the Nemesis rims will hold up to this tension without cracking at the nipples, particularly on drive side spokes number 7 and 8. I should say that I increased the tension after riding for a while at a lower tension only to have a non-drive side spoke go slack, albeit on a different wheel (but same specs), built using the TM-1 which in retrospect was reading high and thus built up a wheel with less than optimal tension. So, while the Park tool is fine to get relative tensions, I rely on the DT Swiss Tensiometer for what I believe is a more absolute measure, particularly when using DT Spokes.

In summary, the Drive side tension reads an average of 130kgf using the DT Tensiometer, while the Park TM-1 gives me an absurd average tension of 157kgf for the same wheel using the most current charts from both DT Swiss and Park. The DT Tensiometer also can reproduce the results within .02mm of deflection. The Park is less reproducible but still does the job.

I think the optimal drive side tension for this build is in the 120-125kgf range. The above wheel may be a little on the tight side, but I like experimenting, even if it means wrecking something here and there along the way to determine the true limits.

Image

_________________
My Colnago C59
My Special Colnago EPQ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 6:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:15 am
Posts: 45
Location: Victoria, BC Canada
Calnago,

While your observation concurs with mine, I'm not following how youv'e derived the deflection in millimeters? These tensiometers have unitless numbers measuring relative deflection. They aren't prescribed or purported to be a measurement of the deflection of the spoke in millimeters. And 24mm deflection is rather large! 2.4cm!

Despite that, I can attest to the observation that a TM-1 records a higher tension than actual. This I have confirmed not by comparing a pre-built wheel, but by using an electronic strain gauge and readout display showing kgf. This strain gauge (a glorified wheatstone bridge) is very precise and fully repeatable, but not inexpensive. However, it is much more convenient than hanging a spoke by weights.

Having such an electronic strain gauge on hand provides a few conveniences, the first and most notable being that I create charts for spokes for the common tensions I use, rather than rely on linear interpretation between coarse values, such as 120kgf, or 130kgf, or sorting out what a reading of "25" is in kgf. I do it the opposite way - set the strain gauge to 120kgf then note what my tensiometers read. This is far more valuable than a generic chart of 'nominal value' converted to kgf or newtons.

I found that my DT Swiss chart expressed a force more than actual but only by about <5kgf. Whereas my two Park TM-1's were often more than 10kgf out (read higher than actual), and my beloved Wheel Fanatyk tensiometer was within 2kgf of actual no matter what the spoke I installed on the strain gauge jig.

My next plan is to have a CNC'ed improved jig so that I can calibrate tensiometers for shops as a service, or self-service. Most bike shops in my area are lucky if they are using a tensiometer at all, and if they do, it is most often the TM-1.

_________________
http://www.zedwheels.com - wheels made just for you


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 7:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:14 pm
Posts: 1136
@zed: My bad. You are absolutely correct about the deflection being unitless, at least for the Park TM-1. The lower chart was just a modification for the Park Tool data and I knew that wasn't in mm but never removed it. I just modified it a bit for comparison purposes of the two tools on the same wheel. Normally I use the bottom chart for the front wheel data. So yes, your catch is good so far as the Park deflections are concerned. However, upon looking at my DT Swiss Tensio, those readings are actually the deflection in millimeters. And my "lookup tables" (not shown) were derived exactly as you say... I just linearly interpreted between the coarse values given in the charts.
I would for sure send my tension meters to you for calibration if you ever offered such a service. But don't the manufacturers of these instruments essentially do what you would do in coming up with these charts in the first place? I would like to see your charts for say, DT Comps and Revolutions should you ever produce them. Also, in your experience, does length of spoke affect the readout at similar tensions? Length is not considered in any of the charts I have seen. And what about butting. Would a double butted spoke like a DT Comp give a different reading than a straight gauge spoke of the same diameter middle section (1.8mm). Just things I've thought about before but never really answered definitively. Thanks.
And thanks for pointing out the error in my charts.

_________________
My Colnago C59
My Special Colnago EPQ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 5:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:15 am
Posts: 45
Location: Victoria, BC Canada
I am not setup to handle huge variations in spoke length on my current hacked together jig, but for the new jig design, I'll be sure to accomodate a range of spokes. That said, the Wheel Fanatyk Jobst Brandt design measures a narrow range of the spoke to assess deflection, and seems less 'fussy' as to placement on a tensioned spoke. I typically attempt to measure as centered on the spoke head to nipple as I can, and when varied, I do observe differing tension readouts on the DT Tensio and the Park, but not the Wheel Fanatyk.

Once I get my new jig built, which I hope happens over the quieter winter months, I'll let you know how it compares to the charts. My DT Tensio is rarely used, and so should not have 'drifted' from what it was calibrated to at the factory.

_________________
http://www.zedwheels.com - wheels made just for you


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Rim Recommendation?
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 12:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:56 pm
Posts: 17
I have a 32H White Industries H2 rear hub that I'd like to lace in the next month or so. Looking for a clincher rim that's sub-400 grams around $50. I've been leaning towards Kinlin XR-200, but I'm open to going a bit heavier or aero if it makes sense. I weigh 160 & this will be for training & logging miles this winter.

Recommendations/Thoughts?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rim Recommendation?
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 12:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:47 pm
Posts: 1442
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA
If it's for training the small weight penalty for a stiffer rim that makes a stronger wheel is not a problem.

If you're sticking with narrow rims the XR270 is a durable rim.

BikeHubStore has good prices on KinLin rims and Sapim spokes.

With 32h you can use Lasers all around.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rim Recommendation?
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 1:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:56 pm
Posts: 17
[quote="eric"]If it's for training the small weight penalty for a stiffer rim that makes a stronger wheel is not a problem.

Good call...I guess I just needed to hear it from someone else. Slightly out of budget, but the Pacenti SL23 looks promising...24mm wide, good depth & decent weight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rim Recommendation?
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 1:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 917
Location: Toronto
I built up a set of wheels recently using Pacenti rims, Laser spokes and the house hubs from BHS and have been very happy with them. The rims are a quality product.

_________________
There's sometimes a buggy.
How many drivers does a buggy have?

One.

So let's just say I'm drivin' this buggy...
and if you fix your attitude you can ride along with me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GekiIMh4ZkM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rim Recommendation?
PostPosted: Mon Sep 09, 2013 4:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 12:57 am
Posts: 47
Location: Boston, MA
I've used the XR-200s for awhile (on a set of H2s) and they have been great, especially for the weight and price. That being said, I'm currently using the wide BHS clincher rims and would highly recommend them. Rather easy to build up, stiff enough (in a 24/28 config), and the ability to lower your tire pressure a bit make them a real joy to ride. They're around your price range, but unfortunately are a bit heaver than you're looking for.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 8:51 pm
Posts: 29
At 190lbs, is 20 spokes (CX-Ray) radially laced ok with Archetype rims?

Thanks

P.S. I've raced on that configuration using Kinlin 300 for five years but are the Archetypes as stiff as the 300s?

Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 3:32 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 10, 2013 1:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 84
This might already been answered in the thread, but when I use the DT calculator to get spoke lengths, it takes the amount of flex into account and gives different spoke lengths depending on what DT spoke I've chosen.

All good so far, as long as I use DT spokes. But what if I would like to bling up my wheel with some Sapim CX Rays? Round up? Base numbers on DT Aero lites? Different spoke calculator?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4658 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1 ... 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 ... 311  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Wheelbuilding - Every 5th spoke too short...

in Road

shinkansen

14

1100

Tue Apr 01, 2014 5:00 am

ProEvoSLTeamHighMod View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. The 'hub help' thread

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Everything wheels

kavitator

20

355

Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:19 pm

sanrensho View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Thread title V2.0

in Test

pam

0

72

Sat Mar 08, 2014 2:38 am

pam View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Attachment(s) The Failed Parts Thread

[ Go to page: 1, 2, 3 ]

in Cycle Chat

spOOn1965

37

5495

Tue Aug 27, 2013 5:59 pm

bura View the latest post


It is currently Sun Apr 20, 2014 5:22 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB