The wheelbuilding thread

Everything about building wheels, glueing tubs, etc.
bm0p700f
in the industry
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
Contact:

by bm0p700f

Front 274mm rear 288/284mm.

I have yet to find sapim alloy nipples popping off. so long as the tip of the spoke reaches the rim then all will be well.

Front would best done 2x.

bm0p700f
in the industry
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
Contact:

by bm0p700f

Laser vs CX-ray's. I have used Lasers on MTB builds before well my own ad the results have been mixed. With an appropriately tensioned wheel (1200N DS) using DT Swiss XR350 rims and A2Z hubs I found with Geax tyre the tension drop was too big for the rear wheel to remain true during a race. Swapping the tyres to Continental supersonic X-king solved this problems now the wheels remain true after a bettering in a race and the tension drop is now normal (i.e very small).

So Laser or CX-ray's need a stiffer rim I think especially if you get the tyre choice wrong. Never seen such a big tension drop before after fitting a clincher.

Also I do not believe for XC use there is a significant aero advantage to using CX-rays. Lets face it MTB's are not aero. I have no issue using round spokes and I will likely continue to use Race spokes only in MTB builds after my experience with Laser's.

I also now have 3 spoke tension gauges. A Park Tool TM-1, DT Swiss anologue and a Sapim. They all give significantly different tension measurements for the same spoke. I do not believe that a DT Swiss Revolution spoke has a significantly elastic modulus from a Sapim Laser as the steel used is the same E=193 GPa for this grade.

On a rear wheel DS on what I would condisder appropriate tension with Laser spokes, the Park tool tool gauge shows the lowest tension, the DT Swiss in the middle and the Sapim gauge show the highest tension on their chart. The difference between the DT Swiss and Sapim gauge is around 150-200N. So I am not sure which one to believe any more, the Park show much lower tensions.

So I will stop stating tensions for builds as it the result entirely depends on which gauge I use to measure it not much use really and these are all brand new gauge's. So it is back to feel and use the gauge to assess relative tension rather than absolute tension. Some day I will tension spokes with a know calibrated weight and measure the create my own conversion chart.

by Weenie


User avatar
rainerhq
Posts: 642
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:32 am
Location: Estonia

by rainerhq

bm0p700f wrote:So Laser or CX-ray's need a stiffer rim I think especially if you get the tyre choice wrong. Never seen such a big tension drop before after fitting a clincher.

Also I do not believe for XC use there is a significant aero advantage to using CX-rays. Lets face it MTB's are not aero. I have no issue using round spokes and I will likely continue to use Race spokes only in MTB builds after my experience with Laser's.

I have wheels on my CX bike built with Lasers 32H, 3x + Novatec hubs and no name carbon rims, no probs. And the rim is very stiff. Tyres are non UST, but without tube, just Stans milk.
"Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride"
Jamis Renegade Expert
Spark 900 RC

eric
Posts: 2196
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:47 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA
Contact:

by eric

bm0p700f wrote: the Park show much lower tensions.

Interesting! I'd like to see the numbers from the different gauges if that is possible.
Are you using the latest Park conversion chart? Apparently they revised it in the last few years. It's on their web site.
bm0p700f wrote: Some day I will tension spokes with a know calibrated weight and measure the create my own conversion chart.


Building a tensiometer calibration rig is on my todo list. I've seen pics of one with an electronic scale attached to a spoke, all in a frame that allows variable tension
to be applied to the spoke. I plan to make something like that.

I have not had a Sapim aluminium nipple's head break off either, but it's possible.

User avatar
kavitator
Posts: 1141
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 9:07 pm
Location: Slovenia---that forest land

by kavitator

I have Wheelfanatyk tensiometer for around 6 months and it is perfection tool
And now i get new Parktool (old one has broken spring)

Parktool show higher tension than wheelfanatyk.

calibration tool is a must if you are in wheelbuilding. I will make it from digital scale (300kg)

bm0p700f
in the industry
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
Contact:

by bm0p700f

I will take some measurement tomorrow from the three gauges on a Velocity A23 build for comparion. Carbon rims Kavitor are normally very stiff so the lack of stiffness in the Laser spokes is not going to be an issue. With a light weight alloy XC rim it is it seems. It was an experiment You have to try these thing and I try all my experiments out on my self. This is one that did not work. Yes with the right rims Lasers will work but I like lightweight rims and I am not sold on carbon XC rims. Damage a rim will be expensive and I have managed to twat rims before when racing.

User avatar
zed
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:15 am
Location: Victoria, BC Canada
Contact:

by zed

kavitator wrote:I have Wheelfanatyk tensiometer for around 6 months and it is perfection tool
And now i get new Parktool (old one has broken spring)

Parktool show higher tension than wheelfanatyk.

... )


I would concur with this. I have an electronic strain gauge jig setup. When I tested all of my tensiometers the last two times, the two Park ones have read consistently higher by up to 10kg. The Wheel Fanatyk has not drifted over 200 wheels and is within 2-3kg of the electronic S-bend strain gauge. The variance depends on type of spoke. My DT Tensio is good for some spoke types and out for others. Rather than "calibrate" them I just create my own charts.

That said my go to tension meter is Rik's Wheel Fanatyk designed by Brandt.
http://www.zedwheels.com - wheels made just for you

eric
Posts: 2196
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:47 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, California, USA
Contact:

by eric

zed wrote:
That said my go to tension meter is Rik's Wheel Fanatyk designed by Brandt.


Is it more cumbersome to use than the Park since you have to zero it on each spoke?

bm0p700f
in the industry
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
Contact:

by bm0p700f

Wheel build with A23 and Novatec hub. Sapim Race spokes DS. Park reads 22.25 - ~1175N DT Swiss reads 1.88 = 1100N Sapim reads 2.95 = ~1040N. so not such a big gap between the Sapim and DT Swiss gauge so I was wrong and the result tallies with what has been said about the Park reading high. Good to know.

Still given I feel I am at the tension limit (as the velocity rims seem to go a bit wobbly when stress relieving when a certain viable tension is past) of the rim I cannot raise tension further. Velocity do claim the tension limit of there rims is in the 110-130kgf range. I have one at the low end.

My own calibration chart is what I need but I the time to make it first. The gauge is more useful to set relative tension.

wrcompositi
Posts: 121
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:57 am

by wrcompositi

bm0p700f wrote:Wheel build with A23 and Novatec hub. Sapim Race spokes DS. Park reads 22.25 - ~1175N DT Swiss reads 1.88 = 1100N Sapim reads 2.95 = ~1040N. so not such a big gap between the Sapim and DT Swiss gauge so I was wrong and the result tallies with what has been said about the Park reading high. Good to know.

Still given I feel I am at the tension limit (as the velocity rims seem to go a bit wobbly when stress relieving when a certain viable tension is past) of the rim I cannot raise tension further. Velocity do claim the tension limit of there rims is in the 110-130kgf range. I have one at the low end.

My own calibration chart is what I need but I the time to make it first. The gauge is more useful to set relative tension.


Park's gauge is really not so useful if the user is more interested in actual tension rather than tension balance. I find Park's only has a precison of up to 1/2 gradation when measuring the same spoke repetitively, thus making the absolute tension even less credible. Wheelfanatyk's seems to have the best design among these tension gauges.

Still good to know Park's would show higher readings, since I have a bad tendency to overshoot my target tension by 10~15kgf. :oops:

User avatar
zed
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:15 am
Location: Victoria, BC Canada
Contact:

by zed

[quote="bombertodd"]Thanks Eric. I'm looking at a 28/32 wheelset for everyday bashing. Should I lace the front radial?
I wouldn't recommend radial lacing 28h BHS WF85. There's not enough meat on that hub with a 31mm FD. 24h is the max you'd generally consider radial lacing with a few exceptions, high-flange solid track hubs come to mind, but for this hub. No. 2x lacing.
http://www.zedwheels.com - wheels made just for you

User avatar
zed
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:15 am
Location: Victoria, BC Canada
Contact:

by zed

eric wrote:
zed wrote:
That said my go to tension meter is Rik's Wheel Fanatyk designed by Brandt.


Is it more cumbersome to use than the Park since you have to zero it on each spoke?


Not at all. I do it instinctively, like blinking.
http://www.zedwheels.com - wheels made just for you

bombertodd
Posts: 441
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:23 am
Contact:

by bombertodd

I built my wheels. Going to test them out now. Review coming soon. Thanks again for everyone that helped answer my questions so far.

bm0p700f
in the industry
Posts: 3500
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
Contact:

by bm0p700f

Well I think the sapim guage reads too high. I took an DT swiss build up to what the Sapim gauge said was 1200N and it went it a bit wobbly reducing the tension to what the DT Swiss gauge said was 1200N sorted the problem. I have has the same issue with a couple of other rims so I will stick to using the DT Swiss gauge from now on.

lpikachu58
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:13 pm

by lpikachu58

kimaswan wrote:
khaostik wrote:Hi,

I'm about to build a pair of carbon tubulars.
I've already bought two http://www.planet-x-bikes.co.uk/i/q/RIPXCAR50/planet-x-carbon-r50-rim planet X 50 mm,
and two hubs from bike hub store:
http://www.bikehubstore.com/SuperLight-Wide-Front-Hub-p/slf78w.htm in 20 holes
http://www.bikehubstore.com/SuperLight-211-p/sl211.htm in 16:8 drilling.

Now I'm about to order the spokes and my problem is the rim ERD. In planet X website they advertise that the ERD is 539.4mm.. but when I measure the internal rim diameter I get 533mm.. Has anyone measure the ERD of this rim?

Best regards,

Filipe Dias

Here is an interesting post to understand how to measure ERD :
http://www.velo-trainer.fr/spip.php?article75
sorry, it's french but I guess you know Google Traduct


I am the author of this page, if some of you are interested I could made a translation.

In addition of the computation of the ERD, you have to correct it with the kind of nipple that you will use. I wrote an article about this few week ago : http://velo-trainer.fr/spip.php?article304

It's in french, but there pictures :wink: :wink: and the correction table is easy to understand.

:wink:

by Weenie


Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post