superdx wrote: spin up ok
Genuinely curious about this quote - I read that a lot but what does it mean? Are there any wheels that don't spin up ok?
Moderator: robbosmans
superdx wrote: spin up ok
DDX wrote:Received mine today, 1.42kg (park tool ds1 scale) vs 1555g on the fulcrum site.
Big difference, not complaining
crux wrote:Calpol wrote:I've ordered a set for my new build. They cost £750 after my British cycling discount at chain reaction. I think they will look awesome on my supersix evo hi mod.
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
Where are the pictures of them?
crux wrote:Calpol wrote:I've ordered a set for my new build. They cost £750 after my British cycling discount at chain reaction. I think they will look awesome on my supersix evo hi mod.
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
Where are the pictures of them?
corky wrote:markgoldstein wrote:In terms of price, these are £840 in the UK vs £1200 for Campy Bora One 35mms - are the latter worth paying the extra £360 for?
Different rim depths
Different hubs.......
Different spoke configuration.
Different brake tracks....
sawyer wrote:I haven't ridden the Fulcrums, but have Bora One 35s
I expect the Boras will be better in every regard other than obviously a fractionally less aero rim depth, though you are probably almost at the point where it is an unmeasurable difference, so doesn't matter
The Bora tubular rim is professional level equipment. Nothing on the Fulcrums is.
the rim looks to be tubeless ready as you mentioned but is missing a notch that retains the tire in case of flat.
For this reason we do not declare them to be tubeless even if we know many riders run them that way.
DDX wrote:Received mine today, 1.42kg (park tool ds1 scale) vs 1555g on the fulcrum site.
Big difference, not complaining
PrimO wrote:I weighed mine on a set of calibrated scales and they're 1482g, I cant see how yours could possibly be 1420g, that's just too big of a difference to be true. Bike24 weighed a set and stated theirs are 1490g.