Real difference between 35mm and 45mm carbon wheels?

Back by popular demand, the general all-things Road forum!

Moderator: robbosmans

Post Reply
BigPoser
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 11:42 pm

by BigPoser

I've been checking out the loooooong carbon wheel thread and have been wondering what the real differences are between either a 35 or 38mm rim vs. a 45mm rim. Are the aero benefits really that noticeable? From that I can tell when comparing the different depths with the same widths, there is about 100gr difference however.

Any thoughts on this? Is a 45mm rim worth it?

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



Marin
Posts: 4035
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:48 am
Location: Vienna Austria

by Marin

about 10mm

User avatar
kgt
Posts: 8749
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 10:29 am
Location: Athens, Greece

by kgt

Just choose whatever looks better on your bike IMHO.

Marin
Posts: 4035
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:48 am
Location: Vienna Austria

by Marin

Sorry could not resist.

I have a set of 50x23 1330g "V-Shape" wheels. I also had a set of 38x25 1540g "U-Shape" wheels.

The most noticable difference was that the 38s were unaffected by crosswinds. No idea if they were faster, that's something you can't feel, or even measure without a pretty sophisticated protocol.

I really liked the 38s, but sold them to build a new set of 35x25s that will be a bit ligher.

All you can do is read up on tests. My recommendation would be to let looks and weight decide, and to get U-shape rims.

User avatar
btompkins0112
Posts: 2635
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 3:04 am
Location: Mississippi

by btompkins0112

^ +1.....short answer is no difference, except for weight of course.

glepore
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 4:42 pm
Location: Virginia USA

by glepore

The crosswind difference above likely had more to do with the shape than the depth. My 50's in both wide v and u are unaffected by crosswinds under say 30mph, at which point any deep wheel would be affected.
Cysco Ti custom Campy SR mechanical (6.9);Berk custom (5.6); Serotta Ottrott(6.8) ; Anvil Custom steel Etap;1996 Colnago Technos Record

Bourquek
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 2:45 pm

by Bourquek

For what it's worth, I have ENVE 3.4 which are the 35 front, 45 rear and I have noticed being pushed a little from cross winds on steep straight descents. I sometimes wonder if a 35 rear would have made a difference or not. Hard to say without experimenting.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



User avatar
boysa
Posts: 1430
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 10:03 pm
Location: Too far from my bike.

by boysa

I experimented with Enve 1.45 and 1.65, and the most stable combo for crosswind was 45 front & 65 rear. Much better than 45/45. I was given the idea by a Zipp rep back at NAHBS '10. He sold me on the theory the larger rear would act as a rudder/stabilizer, and lo and behold he was right. In heavy wind, it's more of a steady push than a quick shove. Sure enough, Enve soon after came out with staggered sets.
"Deserve's got nothing to do with it." William Munny

Post Reply