So looking for some knowledge on the topic above. The V4 pre can be had for some good deals, but are the Firecrest that more advantageous? I know supposed more aero but anything else?
Thanks
Zipp 303 Tubular: V4 Pre-Firecrest vs Firecrest....
Moderator: robbosmans
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
More aero and more stable in crosswinds. Also wider, so your tyres sit wider than what their label say, reducing rolling resistance. Zipp also says that they've embedded kevlar or something to improve durability on rough surfaces.
So yeah, the Firecrests have a distinct edge, I would say.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So yeah, the Firecrests have a distinct edge, I would say.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SHUT UP LEGS
2015 Giant Propel Advanced
2015 Cannondale Supersix Evo
2013 KTM Strada mod. (totaled)
2011 Pinarello Dogma 60.1(loaner)
2011 Scott SUB 45(sold)
Politecnico di Milano Ingegneria Meccanica
2015 Giant Propel Advanced
2015 Cannondale Supersix Evo
2013 KTM Strada mod. (totaled)
2011 Pinarello Dogma 60.1(loaner)
2011 Scott SUB 45(sold)
Politecnico di Milano Ingegneria Meccanica
-
- Posts: 849
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 8:32 am
- Location: Australia
@efeballi the OP wanted to know about Tubulars, the tyres won't sit wider on Tubulars...
I write the weightweenies blog, hope you like it
Disclosure: I'm sponsored by Velocite, but I do give my honest opinion about them (I'm endorsed to race their bikes, not say nice things about them)
Disclosure: I'm sponsored by Velocite, but I do give my honest opinion about them (I'm endorsed to race their bikes, not say nice things about them)
The Kevlar was incorporated within the "carbon bridge" structure on the v4 tubular and carried through with the Firecrest version.
ENVE contract engineer | Former Zipp test engineer
The main advantage of the firecrest shape is its cross wind stability. They are slightly more aero, but the difference is minuscule. Most of the aerodynamic gain over the old V-shaped rims was already made with the V4, as were the durability improvements. The firecrest wheels handle better, but at a slight weight penalty compared to the V4. If you haven't already seen it, here is an interesting video about the development of the V4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g37k9ZoWo6Y
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
Hasn't it been pointed out around here that older models were faster at very low yaw, while Firecrest ones would be almost as good on top of that stall much later?
Bikes: Raw Ti, 650b flatbar CX