HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 4:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 17
I'm looking at building some wheels this winter, and I'm trying to figure out spoke lengths. Using BHS's recommened calculator http://www.wheelpro.co.uk/spokecalc/, I'm getting different numbers than at Dt Swiss. http://spokes-calculator.dtswiss.com/Calculator.aspx

I'm planning on using BHS hubs, 71w front and 190 rear, laced to 50mm carbon/aluminum clinchers. Here's the relevant numbers:
Front PCD 31mm, center-to-flange 40mm
Rear DS PCD 49.6mm, center-to-flange 16.9mm, NDS PCD 38.5mm center-to-flange 37.6mm
Rim ERD 539.4

DT Swiss is saying 247 front radial , 244/246 rear 1x/2x, wheelpro is saying 256 front radial, 255/257 rear 1x/2x.

Somebody's either too short or too long, which is it?


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 4:03 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 10:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 2:02 pm
Posts: 331
You typed 25 instead of 2.5 or whatever spoke hole size Bitex uses into the spoke hole diameter variable for the DT Swiss calculator.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 1104
Location: Toronto
Wheelpro is correct for a 20 spoke radial front.

DT Swiss also makes a correction for nipple lengths, which I later found out only applies to their own brand. Other brands threading is in the same place regardless of length.

You forgot to mention the number of spokes.

Also I'd be doing 2X both sides at back. Don't see any benefit to a 1X NDS.

_________________
There's sometimes a buggy.
How many drivers does a buggy have?

One.

So let's just say I'm drivin' this buggy...
and if you fix your attitude you can ride along with me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GekiIMh4ZkM


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 2:02 pm
Posts: 331
I think he's planning 1xDS (heads in) or the spoke lengths don't make sense.
1xDS has resulted in broken flanges on these hubs though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 1104
Location: Toronto
Agree. hence my advice to go 2X both sides at the rear.

_________________
There's sometimes a buggy.
How many drivers does a buggy have?

One.

So let's just say I'm drivin' this buggy...
and if you fix your attitude you can ride along with me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GekiIMh4ZkM


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 4:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 17
Looks like the spoke hole diameter was the problem. Don't know why I read that wrong, but I put the number of spokes in there, not diameter. Getting that set right got the numbers to match up. I had a feeling DT was making changes for nipple length, I had noticed small changes when changing nipple length. Measure twice, buy once...

I'm planning 20 front, 24 rear. Thanks for the advice on the 2x NDS, are the hubs ok for radial front?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 17
Oh, and the reason I was shooting for 1x NDS lacing was based on this whitepaper from Williams that showed the relative tensions of various lacing techniques. I was hoping to get some of the NDS tension relative to radial (for balance), without as much tension change as radial (for longevity). 2x/1x seemed like a decent compromise, but if it's not going to make much difference, I'll stick with 2x/2x.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 1104
Location: Toronto
BHS hubs are fine for radial spoking in front.

There is no consensus as to whether heads in or out is best, so entirely up to you. There was a discussion very recently on this.

Just to expand on the DT Swiss calculator and nipple lengths.

Before I knew any better, I'd assumed that a longer nipple would mean a shorter spoke. Because that's what their calculator does. Really quite misleading. For any other nipples it seems not to be the case. The threaded portion of most nipples is at the top regardless of length.

I don't use it any more. The BHS linked one is quicker and works fine.

_________________
There's sometimes a buggy.
How many drivers does a buggy have?

One.

So let's just say I'm drivin' this buggy...
and if you fix your attitude you can ride along with me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GekiIMh4ZkM


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 3:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:57 am
Posts: 90
In the case of thin spokes(DT Revolution, Sapim Laser or bladed spokes of equivalent weights) and high tension(rear DS), it's more convenient to use DT's calculator, which compensates for the elongation of spokes and rounds down the results. So in DT's calculator, Revolution's length(after correction) always rounds down even the result is like 260.9mm, while Competition's length rounds down only when the decimal is less than 0.5mm.

A 260mm-long 2.0-1.5-2.0 butted spoke, tensioned to 120kgf, will stretch by 0.9mm, which is not a marginal error if you're an obsessive wheel builder. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:38 pm
Posts: 1104
Location: Toronto
Quote:
it's more convenient to use DT's calculator, which compensates for the elongation of spokes and rounds down the results.


An interesting theory which I was not able to verify using their calculator.

It gave me identical precise lengths and rounded lengths for a rear wheel using either straight spokes or skinny butted 2-1.5-2.

It's an interesting point though that I don't recall being discussed. Perhaps I just haven't spent enough time on wheelbuilder forums.

_________________
There's sometimes a buggy.
How many drivers does a buggy have?

One.

So let's just say I'm drivin' this buggy...
and if you fix your attitude you can ride along with me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GekiIMh4ZkM


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 9:20 pm 
Offline
in the industry

Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 7:25 pm
Posts: 1414
Location: Glermsford, Suffolk U.K
Use spocalc it is far better than the DT Swiss calculator as it is a spreadsheet and you can play i.e get it to work out spoke weights, do funny lacing patterns e.t.c

_________________
www.thecycleclinic.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:57 am
Posts: 90
bm0p700f wrote:
Use spocalc it is far better than the DT Swiss calculator as it is a spreadsheet and you can play i.e get it to work out spoke weights, do funny lacing patterns e.t.c


I made myself a spreadsheet calculator which takes account of the elongation of spokes. May I call it "spocalc LIGHT edition"? :lol:
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 10:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 17
Well, after much more review, it looks like the best compromise build for the BHS rear is 1x DS heads out, 2x NDS heads in. Sheldon Brown's spocalc shows about 85% tension for the spokes and avoids some of the issues with radial NDS, especially 16:8. I probably will build these over the winter, whenever I have time and money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 11:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:52 pm
Posts: 187
Location: eNZed
Are you actually 2x the 8 spokes on the NDS and 1x the 16 DS, stubob?
Is it indeed possible to 2x the 8 NDS?

_________________
Less is more.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 2:02 pm
Posts: 331
Mackers wrote:
1xDS has resulted in broken flanges on these hubs though.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 4:37 am 


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Juanmoretime and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Road bar testing results

in Road

madcow

8

929

Sat May 24, 2014 1:30 pm

spartan View the latest post


It is currently Wed Oct 22, 2014 10:37 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB