Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Tue May 31, 2016 11:16 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED

If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous 13 4 5 6 7 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:56 am
Posts: 273
Location: Ontario, Canada
Im liking the clean black and white look, really coming together nicely.

side note, what's with all SRM products looking like they're from the 80's?

_________________
Sur La Plaque!

2012 Ridley Damocles RS
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=111632
2012 Dekerf Team SST
http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=112060&p=957055#p957055


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 4:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 4:23 am
Posts: 1067
Location: Poland/Toronto
Form and function :thumbup:

Where are some real WW parts though...

Chris.

_________________
MSC Koncept Carbon Di2 - 6955g
Leichtkraft Team Carbon - 6868g.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 8:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 3036
Location: Canada
Quinn039

I think SRM products just look simple and clean. I have owned a Quarq MTB unit and the design was much more clunky and unrefined versus the SRM spider. SRM's are just that, simple looking, simple functions, works all the time and bombproof, it's what I need. :thumbup:

krzysiekmz

I hear you RE WW parts. This bike is not intended to be sub X,XX kg for many reasons. My first goal is to make a nice looking bike with reliable yet decently light components. This bike will see a lot of training rides and a lot of races as well. Having had unfortunate DNF because of mechanical in the past, my phylosophy regarding my race bike for olympic cross-country is it must be reliable and strong to get me to the finish line, otherwise, it's worth nothing. I put a lot fo energy in my physical preparation toward high level races, I can't afford to DNF because my nice WW seatpost snaps or my tires blow off or whatever else. The bike will be equiped with high end performance components, such as ENVE as you can see, my SRM and some more components to come. I think the most WW parts are the 1440g wheelset, which isn't exactly light but light enough. If I invest in a weight reduction, it will certainly be the wheelset, but I'd want it to loose significant weight, i-e. at least 250g...

I may be looking for a lighter stem though so if you guys have any suggestions for a lighter stem in -17 deg, I'd gladly listen to it. Of course it needs to be reasonably priced.

Anyways, I hope you guys enjoy the build so far and what the bike looks like!


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 11:33 am
Posts: 358
Location: T'ba!
Updates?

_________________
My Training & Racing Blog -->http://mountainbikemediocrity.wordpress.com
Fuelled by --> http://www.pro4mance.com.au


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 16, 2014 11:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:52 pm
Posts: 141
Location: Switzerland / Hungary
Updates exactly.. we want to see at least the complete bike :wink:

_________________
Caad 10
Bianchi EV3
Canyon Speedmax AL


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 16, 2014 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 3036
Location: Canada
hey guys!!!

I am still waiting on the rear brake. I was told the 985 may be discountinued (from where I purchased it). I will know better today.

So now I have basically 2 options:

1- buy the 985 brake elsewhere

2- return the front 985 and be sent the new 987 magnesium XTR brakes for 240$ each. They will refund the shipping.

My only problem with the 987 brakes is I already have some XTR i-spec shifters and im not sure they will be compatible. The m987 are i-spec b-type compatible. Maybe you guys can help me out, see here: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=122355


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 16, 2014 4:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:20 pm
Posts: 147
Hey devinci,

I haven't heard anything about 985's being discontinued, but stock seems to be quite limited everywhere, Shimano isn't releasing another run of them until Late Jan/Early Feb.

The 987's may be hard to find, scoop some up if they have them in stock. Shimano N-A doesn't have any, with an ETA of March 28.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 16, 2014 10:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 3036
Location: Canada
XTR 987s coming my way, should get them tomorrow or on monday

;)


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:20 pm
Posts: 147
Very nice, please post weights!


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 3036
Location: Canada
Soooooooooooooooooooooo.................................................



Here they are!! Nice way to top off a weird friday at work: wine and sick looking brakes. There is very little pictures and information on these on the internet. Un fortunately the only thing I can provide is verified weights and crappy pictures. I won't give you guys a ride report before a long time because we can't ride over here.

Overall they look amazing, well built. I hope they perform well too.

Weights are with full length hoses

Front brake 189g
Image

Rear brake 205g
Image

Brake lever carbon blade
Image

Brake lever i-spec fitting area
Image

Brake lever
Image

Caliper
Image
Image

Caliper bolts are Ti
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 5:39 pm
Posts: 967
Location: Here, there and everywhere
Thanks for the pics and weights :thumbup:

Only 16g saved on the front and 24g saved on the rear brake compared to my XTR M985's... not such a great saving but they do look good.

Seems my skepticism that the claimed 30g saving per end takes in to account Ti hardware rather than steel on the latest version- not weight saving just in the caliper and lever.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 3036
Location: Canada
yup!
Standard steel Shimano bolts are 10g VS 5g for the Ti ones.

Anyways, still a nice saving and nice looking brake. Will see how much hose needs to be cut.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 2:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 3036
Location: Canada
Lastest updates guys!!

Installed the new XTR brakes and shortened the lines, bled the brakes too. Installed the XTR 2 way release shifters and the bottle cage with aluminium bolts.

The rear brake adapter has 2 black titanium bolts and both caliper have titanium bolts as well. I wanted to switch the brake lever bolts to black aluminium ones but they are hard to screw in and I don't want to force anything. Im not sure if the pitch is different or if the black color makes it harder to screw in.

Next will be the rear derailleur and figuring out how much cable and housing I need. Hopefully, it looses a little weight there.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 1:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 5:39 pm
Posts: 967
Location: Here, there and everywhere
Looking good!

Quote:
I wanted to switch the brake lever bolts to black aluminium ones but they are hard to screw in and I don't want to force anything. Im not sure if the pitch is different or if the black color makes it harder to screw in


I found exactly the same thing with the 985's. I put it down to maybe the alu bolts being off spec but they fit fine in other threads elsewhere on the bike. All I can think is that there might be some threadlock in the lever body which makes the bolt hard to screw in. I went for Ti bolts in the end for peace of mind and only gained 1-2g vs Alu.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Jan 25, 2014 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:43 pm
Posts: 3036
Location: Canada
having an issue here

the rear wheel, when installed, will have the rotor rub in the caliper, major rub. I am using a 160mm adaptor and 160mm rotor. What the heck is wrong here?

Image

Image


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous 13 4 5 6 7 Next

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Naked steel

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

hmai18

18

2109

Mon May 09, 2016 8:47 am

Stolichnaya View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Evo Hi-Mod with a little splash (5991g) - Update 3-13-16

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ]

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

Bianchi10

82

11967

Wed Apr 27, 2016 2:08 am

Bianchi10 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Dura Ace 9000 next update?

[ Go to page: 1 2 3 ]

in Road

itguy

44

6568

Wed Sep 02, 2015 2:14 pm

HTML View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Portuguese Custom Steel

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

thebuny

25

3485

Mon Jan 18, 2016 11:19 am

thebuny View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Anyone riding vintage steel?

in MTB

headtube

12

507

Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:58 pm

headtube View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Haydn, Olivv and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited