HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2003 7:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 7:02 pm
Posts: 1
Location: Finland
The research team of MC Kramppi Scientific Bike Research Center has analyzed the differences between the claimed and the actual weights of mountain bike components. The summary of their research report can be found down below. The complete version of the report can be found on the MC Kramppi homepage (www.mckramppi.com/en/weight_differences ... rences.htm).

The analyses concentrated on finding the answers to the following questions:

1 What is the average difference between the real and the claimed weights of the components? What is the distribution of the weight differences?

2 Which manufacturers are the biggest optimists? Are there some manufacturers that claim their component weights to be higher than the actual weights? Which manufacturers are the most accurate?

3 On what type of components the weight differences are the largest?

4 Which individual components have the biggest weight differences? On which individual components the actual and real weights are exactly the same?

The analyses were based on the weight data collected from the Weight Weenies database. The basic data included weight data for 3,754 components, but only those components which had both the real and the claimed weight data were included in the analyses. The number of those components was 1,150.

The claimed weights of the components were most often inaccurate because in less than 10% of the cases the real and the claimed weights were exactly the same. The average weight difference was 2.5%. There was a weight difference of more than 5% (either way) in 28% of the cases.

The analysis of the weights by manufacturer revealed quite large differences on how accurately the manufacturers claim the weights of their components. Among the most optimistic manucfacturers were: Bontrager (+8.5%), Extralite (+6.5%), RockShox (+6.3%), Marzocchi (+6.1%) and ITM (+5.8%). One of the most accurate manufacturers was the giant Shimano which claimed its component weights within 0.2% of the real weight on average. Other reliable manufacturers included Continental, Schwalbe, tune and FRM. The analysis also revealed 8 manufacturers which claimed their component weights to be higher than the real weights. Among those manufacturers were Hutchinson (-1.5%), SRAM (-1.1%) and tune (-0.2%).

The component weight differences were also analysed by component type. This analysis revealed that manufacturers tend to claim the weights of for example the suspension forks (+5.1%) and disc brakes (+4.7%) to be much lower than the real weights are.

_________________
www.mckramppi.com/en/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2003 12:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 1:23 pm
Posts: 80
Location: holland
Thát's why we have our own listings here! :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2003 12:24 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2003 2:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 2:24 am
Posts: 366
Location: Sydney, Australia
Forks manufacturers sometimes weigh their products w/o some parts and therefore real weights may be (a lot) different than advertised. On their webpage RockShox mentions that claimed weights are w/ 160 mm steerer - it is probably shorter than anyone can use and a bit of a deception (obviously it is written in tiny letters somewhere on the bottom). Apparently Marzocchi weighs their forks w/o oil and RST w/o steerers at all.

_________________
Best regards,
Rado bladteth Rzeznicki


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Enve 3.4 vs 6.7 real world differences

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Everything wheels

bman11

25

2681

Sun Feb 02, 2014 7:52 am

carbonLORD View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Ritchey Break Away real weights

in Road

Tristan

5

824

Mon May 05, 2014 10:44 pm

farva View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Scott Foil frames - real life weights?

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Road

neeb

22

3431

Fri Dec 06, 2013 8:47 pm

neeb View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. comparing claimed mass to Tour magazine measurements

in Road

djconnel

5

496

Sat Aug 30, 2014 8:48 pm

tinozee View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. TT bike - differences in aeroness

in Cycle Chat

Kermithimself

11

814

Wed Sep 03, 2014 3:03 am

djconnel View the latest post


It is currently Sun Sep 21, 2014 11:52 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB