HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 26, 2003 7:09 pm 

Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 7:02 pm
Posts: 1
Location: Finland
The research team of MC Kramppi Scientific Bike Research Center has analyzed the differences between the claimed and the actual weights of mountain bike components. The summary of their research report can be found down below. The complete version of the report can be found on the MC Kramppi homepage ( ... rences.htm).

The analyses concentrated on finding the answers to the following questions:

1 What is the average difference between the real and the claimed weights of the components? What is the distribution of the weight differences?

2 Which manufacturers are the biggest optimists? Are there some manufacturers that claim their component weights to be higher than the actual weights? Which manufacturers are the most accurate?

3 On what type of components the weight differences are the largest?

4 Which individual components have the biggest weight differences? On which individual components the actual and real weights are exactly the same?

The analyses were based on the weight data collected from the Weight Weenies database. The basic data included weight data for 3,754 components, but only those components which had both the real and the claimed weight data were included in the analyses. The number of those components was 1,150.

The claimed weights of the components were most often inaccurate because in less than 10% of the cases the real and the claimed weights were exactly the same. The average weight difference was 2.5%. There was a weight difference of more than 5% (either way) in 28% of the cases.

The analysis of the weights by manufacturer revealed quite large differences on how accurately the manufacturers claim the weights of their components. Among the most optimistic manucfacturers were: Bontrager (+8.5%), Extralite (+6.5%), RockShox (+6.3%), Marzocchi (+6.1%) and ITM (+5.8%). One of the most accurate manufacturers was the giant Shimano which claimed its component weights within 0.2% of the real weight on average. Other reliable manufacturers included Continental, Schwalbe, tune and FRM. The analysis also revealed 8 manufacturers which claimed their component weights to be higher than the real weights. Among those manufacturers were Hutchinson (-1.5%), SRAM (-1.1%) and tune (-0.2%).

The component weight differences were also analysed by component type. This analysis revealed that manufacturers tend to claim the weights of for example the suspension forks (+5.1%) and disc brakes (+4.7%) to be much lower than the real weights are.


Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2003 7:09 pm 

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2003 12:24 pm 

Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2003 1:23 pm
Posts: 80
Location: holland
Thát's why we have our own listings here! :D

PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2003 2:54 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 2:24 am
Posts: 366
Location: Sydney, Australia
Forks manufacturers sometimes weigh their products w/o some parts and therefore real weights may be (a lot) different than advertised. On their webpage RockShox mentions that claimed weights are w/ 160 mm steerer - it is probably shorter than anyone can use and a bit of a deception (obviously it is written in tiny letters somewhere on the bottom). Apparently Marzocchi weighs their forks w/o oil and RST w/o steerers at all.

Best regards,
Rado bladteth Rzeznicki

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: SuperflyRick, wingguy and 5 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Dedacciai Ran 2015 frame real vs claimed weight

in Road




Mon Mar 02, 2015 4:02 pm

ToffieBoi View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Token C28 Arsenal Clincher (claimed weight 1,210grams) Test?

in Everything wheels




Tue Nov 03, 2015 7:25 pm

Quixote View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Differences between S-Works and Pro

in Road




Wed Jul 15, 2015 8:36 pm

NealH View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. How could we pin down the wheels differences?

in Everything wheels




Fri May 29, 2015 5:47 am

wheelsONfire View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Deda forks claimed weight accuracy (F14 forks)

in Road




Fri Jul 31, 2015 6:00 pm

chrism View the latest post

It is currently Mon Nov 30, 2015 1:03 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour

Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by

How to get rid of these ads? Just register!

Powered by phpBB

-10% on AX Lightness        Discunt will be shown / added at the shopping basket. NOT combinable with regular WW discount!
▹ Nasdorowje
▹ Premium Road 38 tubular
▹ Leaf carbon saddle with leather cover
▹ Vial Evo carbon frame "D" with THM Scapula CT fork