Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About
It is currently Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:32 pm
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2003 1:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 1:18 am
Posts: 3
Hey I was just wondering if you guys had info on this subject. Last year I owned a 2002 Trek fuel 100 with the aluminum frame, and carbon rear triangle. It was a nice bike, and weight in competitively stock. This year I got my new race bike an 03' Fuel 98, and have been working tirelessly on getting the weight down, but cant seem to find out where it seems there is mystery weight comming from..

I was also disapointed when i felt the weight of the new carbon framed fuel 100, with full o3' xtr and bontrager x-lite rims, it seemed still hevier than my trusty old aluminum frameed fuel.

Word from my shop was that trek aparantly removed 1/4 of a pound from the aluminum front tubing.

The wording on that seemed sorta tricky, So I gave trek an email and asked them if there entire 03 carbon fuel frame and rear shock weighd more than there 03 aluminum entire frame and reaer shock. But have received no response on the subject..

If any one has any info or input on the supject let me know, other wise I will have to tear it down and find out for myself.

thanks


Top
   
 Post subject: response from trek
PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2003 7:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 1:18 am
Posts: 3
I final got emailed back regarding the frame isue... They claim that the new carbon frmaed fuel ends up being the same weight as the old aluminum because the fox rear shock they attatched was heavier this year than last..

So the frames end up weigng the same..

that was the trek's answer


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. New Trek Fuel EX

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in MTB

LionelB

20

1678

Sat Dec 26, 2015 9:40 am

TheRookie View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Trek Top Fuel 9.9 SL

in MTB

Vallinotti

5

1704

Thu Mar 24, 2016 9:40 pm

Getter View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Trek Fuel EX 9.9 Build Thread

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in MTB

Gullholm

27

2113

Sun Aug 07, 2016 12:23 am

LeDuke View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Fuel. What Fuel goes in your tank?

in Training

han1337

13

1347

Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:14 pm

R350 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Criterium racing - Carbon or Aluminum?

in Road

Jmdesignz2

4

816

Mon Sep 21, 2015 4:19 am

TwiggyTN View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited