ChrizZZz wrote:Newww Stuff
I want it
Moderators: maxim809, Moderator Team
the_marsbar wrote:What's up with these fork issues?! First I had the inner leg of my fork replaced, because there were scratches along it (cause the O-ring to be wet of oil). Now I think I have the common (?) problem related to the wave spring (blowing through travel, even with 100 psi in the fork). Does anyone know the origin of the problem? Bad batch of springs?
These springs need to be replaced every 50 hours of riding btw., according to Cannondale (http://media.cannondale.com/media//uplo ... 200415.pdf).
Anyone with experience in doing this replacement themselves?
Vallinotti wrote:Hi all,
What would be the resut in using a SRM in a FSI. I mean in the sense that it requires a special XX1 spider.
gfeldy wrote:Vallinotti wrote:Hi all,
What would be the resut in using a SRM in a FSI. I mean in the sense that it requires a special XX1 spider.
Well I think it can be done, but why wouldn't you look at a stages? Lighter and doesn't require any drive side alterations.
LionelB wrote:Are they staying with 135 QR for 2016 ?
the_marsbar wrote:gfeldy, did you look in the dealer book that has been leaked a while ago? I think it looks like it's unchanged. I'm 99% sure the bike will come with the 135 mm Ai rear for 2016. Why would they make such a big deal out of it (60% stiffer, no need to go thru axle, etc.), if they change it after one year?
The dealer book (2016) also says: "up to 60% stiffer than a conventionally laced wheel, while using a standard rim and normal 135mm hub."