HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 7:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:28 am
Posts: 957
What? Nobody wants to make any money?

Here's what might literally be the easiest and cheapest bike component to fabricate (assuming you go with a bolt-on design)... And everybody is trying to get $75-$150 for them? Seriously?

How many of these has Tune or Carbon-Ti actually sold at these stupid prices? A few hundred? Maybe?

C'mon Asian aftermarket industry. Let's get a move on already. 20g-40g, $20, on eBay. Whoever does it sells them all day at a $19 profit and clears every other manufactures combined total sales figures in couple of weeks.

Don't get me wrong. I'll shell out stupid money for some stuff like every other obsessed sucker. But this is moronic. It's a tube. With threads on one end, and a 5mm hex indent on the other. Jeez.

_________________
Oof.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 11:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 5:58 pm
Posts: 557
Location: Surrey, UK
We did this a few weeks ago, I totally agree. There's myriad cheap carbon/ti skewers out there, but no one's yet doing cheap alu thru-axles.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 11:13 am 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:25 am
Posts: 2196
Location: Southern Indiana USA
Speculating, but every fork manufacturer makes them a little different. Fox inserts from the left and SRAM inserts from the right. So it is much harder to do aftermarket since you would have to have inventory of several versions. Also, they seem to have different locking mechanism and more than likely they are patented by each manufacturer. This is all part of the overall plot of the bike industry to make everything proprietary and non-interchangable so we all have to go through our dealer for "special" parts. That is why I pretty much stick to old school parts such as quick release. If I was independently wealthy, I would start a bike company called "Old School Bikes" that made bikes with traditional interchangeable parts.

_________________
For certain parts stiffer is more important than lighter.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 3:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 5:58 pm
Posts: 557
Location: Surrey, UK
Quote:
Also, they seem to have different locking mechanism and more than likely they are patented by each manufacturer.


Not an issue with a bolt up version, you're right about thread placement and what not, so yes, there would need to be several versions. But it still seems odd that we're seeing all the 'big boys' doing it, and not a single one of the catalogue brands. KCNC have a QR one which is a step below Tune/Carbon Ti etc, but that's still not cheap, and doing away with the QR would make it lighter and cheaper.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 12:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:30 am
Posts: 726
Location: Simi Valley CA
Stock ones are fairly pricey. Jenson has a stock Fox one for 75usd. Marzocchi is around 55usd.

I was going to pick up a Carbon Ti one...but I have a fork mount roof rack and having to remove the front wheel with a hex key to put my bike on the rack isn't worth the trouble.

_________________
eurperg wrote:
My wife is sitting next to me, and just thought that was a dildo, not a saddle.. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 9:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 5:58 pm
Posts: 557
Location: Surrey, UK
Quote:
Stock ones are fairly pricey. Jenson has a stock Fox one for 75usd. Marzocchi is around 55usd.


Again, they're QR, which are relatively complex, with expanders and what not, more so than a conventional QR skewer.

The Carbon-Ti ones are just a tube of alu with a thread on one end and a 5mm allen key hole in t'other.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 1:06 pm
Posts: 151
Location: UK
No one seen these?

http://www.xcracer.com/shop/viewproduct ... ductid=358

http://www.xcracer.com/shop/viewproduct ... ductid=347

_________________
"I could have done this job myself in five minutes, but as things turned out I had to spend two days trying to find out why it had taken someone else three weeks to do it wrong."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 11:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 4:12 am
Posts: 87
I wouldn't call £60-70 cheap, given that Ti QR axles can be found for £20 at places like Planet X


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 5:58 pm
Posts: 557
Location: Surrey, UK
The Carbon Ti ones look excellent, but agree that £140 a pair isn't really cheap. That's more than all but the most mental QRs after all!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 1:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:28 am
Posts: 957
kingkongsfinger wrote:


That's the Carbon-Ti. £140 a set, or roughly $240 USD.

For maybe six dollars of materials and manufacturing cost, due only to the fact that they are a smallish firm.

They are barking lunatics asking that sort of money. Not faulting anyone who buys them... They appear to be one of the best options on the market, and if you need a lightweight TA, you need a lightweight TA.

But any of the larger Asian manufacturers have the tooling and resources to pump out something of similar weight for perhaps 12 cents a pop... Selling them at $20 a set, they'd corner the market literally overnight. And still make great money. No idea why this hasn't happened. Shoot, anybody with access to aluminum and a CAD machine could make these for the same manufacturing costs as Carbon-Ti, and corner the market by selling them at (a still very profitable) $30-$40 a set... Bottom line, somebody needs to be happy just selling them at a great profit, rather than an absurd one.

Any forum members with machining skill out there?.. The market is ripe for a side business...

_________________
Oof.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 1:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:25 am
Posts: 2196
Location: Southern Indiana USA
Light Bicycle makes killer carbon rims and they also make a few other carbon parts. Maybe they will start to make these at some point.

_________________
For certain parts stiffer is more important than lighter.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:23 am
Posts: 372
Starter wrote:

C'mon Asian aftermarket industry. Let's get a move on already. 20g-40g, $20, on eBay. Whoever does it sells them all day at a $19 profit and clears every other manufactures combined total sales figures in couple of weeks.



How much is a 160mm long by 20mm diameter piece of 7075 aluminum? :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 11:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:30 am
Posts: 726
Location: Simi Valley CA
I wonder how much load the QR is actually under? I would imagine a company producing a QR has to put it under some kind of stress test before putting it to market. That could be where a good part of the production cost goes to? I'd hate to imagine if one was to fail and vibrate out during a ride.

The liability is the first thing that comes to my mind when thinking about producing something like this. :?

_________________
eurperg wrote:
My wife is sitting next to me, and just thought that was a dildo, not a saddle.. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2014 6:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 5:58 pm
Posts: 557
Location: Surrey, UK
yourdaguy wrote:
Light Bicycle makes killer carbon rims and they also make a few other carbon parts. Maybe they will start to make these at some point.


Not really the sort of thing I'd ever expect to be made out of carbon... Certainly not cheaply anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2014 6:06 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 5:07 am
Posts: 69
I dont think using carbon would be a great idea for a thru axle. But you are right we need more cheap lightweight thru-axles in cool anodized options because my Fox axles might be safe and reliable, but they are definitely not cheap, light, and black is boring.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 
Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Lightweight 15mm axles, how strong?

in MTB

HaakonJohansen

4

389

Fri Sep 12, 2014 9:04 pm

cerro View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. crank bros quattro ti axles?

in Road

tinytree

0

48

Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:57 am

tinytree View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Like axles for 15mm thru axle forks and 142 rear?

in MTB

boots2000

3

742

Thu May 29, 2014 7:46 am

weeni View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Cheap carbon clinchers

in Everything wheels

nick

8

1163

Thu Dec 12, 2013 6:49 pm

nick View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. rather cheap 595 ultra build

[ Go to page: 1, 2 ]

in Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

m4k1

17

1433

Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:48 pm

m4k1 View the latest post


It is currently Sun Oct 26, 2014 8:19 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB