HOT: Active* forum members generally gain 5% discount at starbike.com store!
Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Articles FAQ Contact About




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2013 6:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:54 pm
Posts: 398
Location: USA
Jooo, apologies: I agree "botch-job" is too strong a word for it. I think "uncharted territory" might have been a better way of phrasing it. We're both interested in finding the best balance of cost/performance/weight, and there's a lot of factors. I agree the Cannondale arms are over-priced, but weight-wise they're good, and the system is well-used even on BSA. S-works definitely seem like a great setup if you have one of the frame BBs you listed. I believe the RaceFace NextSL will retail for $500 so those aren't too terrible cost-wise compared to others (much better than Cannondale), and are a lot lighter than I believe Sram BB30 would be (Sram BB30 only seem to save 50g or so over their GXP alternative... which if so means they still aren't very competitive in terms of weight), and setting them up with proper chainline, etc will be straightforward.

I guess a big question for me is whether the Force arms might be lighter than eg XX1 arms. If so that might make them a more attractive weight and warrant the effort in getting them to work. But it seems odd that it would work on many frames: road Q-factors are often 15-25mm less than mtb ones (eg 140 vs 165) , in which case I would think the arms wouldn't clear the majority of MTB chainstays...

Question is, why are the Sram mountain cranks so heavy compared to their road ones? From this thread it seems like the Red crank arms in BB30 only weigh 370g, whereas the XX1 in this configuration (BB30 with spider) is 496g... That's a huge difference!

_________________
Enjoying my Funk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 3:33 am
Posts: 4
I have tried to do this.

Sram Force CX1 GXP crankset on a 2015 Giant Anthem 27.5 that has a 88mm wide shell.

I was attempting to get a lower q-factor on a mountain bike.

The first issue, is that even though the CX1 crank has the same removable spider configuration as XX, X0 cranks, the width of the connection is thinner on the CX1, so a normal MTB Sram spider cannot be used. Also a XX spider and XX chainring will not fit on the CX1 crank, as the chainring hits the crank, the U factor is too small, it works with very large chainrings, such as 110bcd, but they are not practical on a MTB. This was solved going to a spiderless chainring - specifically using Absoluteblack.

The next problem, and most important, is that using a PF86 cup assembly in the frame, the cranks cannot be tightened to hold together securely, without compressing the bearing so much it cannot turn freely.

There is some speculation that using a BB386 cup - designed to work with a spindle width of a GXP crank, but with a spindle thickness of a BB30 (the bearings are very thin and retro fit into a GXP shell) - and some unknown long spindle BB30 crank will work.

Whether or not this would work well enough to get the desired q-factor of the CX1 cranks of 145mm is unknown.

For the amount of trouble it is, the XX1 crank with a q-factor of 156mm seems attractive.


On a side note, the Rotor 3D cranks look like they may work, but only if someone makes a spiderless chainring to suit it - 28t please if a manufacturer is reading.

_________________
Pain is your friend - http://www.bigringriding.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 1:11 pm 


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 3:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:45 pm
Posts: 35
Location: Varazdin,Croatia
Hi guys :)

I ride my Lightning BB30 crank on BSA FS frame,with custom made(at home) BB cups.

Cups have 30,5 mm hole diameter,and axle is 88 mm wide,with custom double chainring,and the Chainline is 47 mm.

Image
Image
Image

_________________
BE a bike raider ,NOT a net surfer!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 
Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. BB30 SRAM/Quarq Red 22 crankset in BB86 Addict frame?

in Road

gfk60

1

574

Sat Feb 01, 2014 9:22 pm

5 8 5 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Sram Red 22 BB30 vs FSA K-force BB30 weight comparison

in Cyclocross / Touring

vcnz

1

525

Mon Dec 23, 2013 9:39 am

frohrider View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Sram Red BB30 vs pressfit

in Road

ironman1

5

775

Sat Mar 08, 2014 8:12 am

Cosmo View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. SRAM Force BB30 question

in Road

garage0racing

8

585

Thu May 15, 2014 12:07 pm

Rush View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Installing BB30 BB with SRAM Red Exogram

in Road

drainyoo

4

368

Sun Jun 08, 2014 7:22 am

grover View the latest post


It is currently Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:01 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Advertising   –  FAQ   –  Contact   –  Convert   –  About

© Weight Weenies 2000-2013
hosted by starbike.com


How to get rid of these ads? Just register!


Powered by phpBB