Weight Weenies
* FAQ    * Search    * Trending Topics
* Login   * Register
HOME Listings Blog NEW Galleries NEW FAQ Contact About Impressum
It is currently Sun Sep 25, 2016 1:18 am
Recently the board software has been updated and there are some known bugs/failures:
- Avatars are currently not being displayed ✔ FIXED
- Tapatalk connection is currently broken ✔ FIXED
- Avatars cannot be uploaded ✔ FIXED

Please note that we will soon do some changes in WW board template design in case to get a fully mobile/desktop responsiveness board!
If you find more errors please post it here: http://weightweenies.starbike.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=139062


All times are UTC+01:00





Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Tires: Volume vs weight
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 6:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:06 am
Posts: 45
Hello. Quick question. I have been running (26X)2.25 tires for the past two years or so because everyone say they are better, and the less rolling resistance and "float" argument makes sense. But 2.25 tires come at a pretty good weight penalty. Should I go back to 2.1s? I am 230lbs at 6'2" if that effects anything and the local trails are a very up and down. The climbs aren't long, but at good grades. I have been running more and more aggressive treads so moved from Rocket Rons EVOs to folding CST Heathens, and am now trying a set of cheap and heavy Nobby Nic (Performance compound and wire bead) take offs. I've only one ride and they are an adjustment, but the turns are so tight on the local trails that I am loving how much grip they have at full lean. A 2.1 Evo TL-ready is listed at 475g vs 545g for the same 2.25 version. I usually run 30-32psi front and +3psi in the rear.

Thoughts? Suggestions? Thanks.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 6:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 3:48 am
Posts: 1442
What rims are you using?


Top
   
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 6:18 am 


Top
   
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 11, 2013 12:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:06 am
Posts: 45
Fulcrum Red Metal 0 (rim brake).


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 3:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 3:48 am
Posts: 1442
Inner rim width plays a big part in tyre volume so that's why I asked. I was going to suggest building/borrowing/trialing some wheels with wide rims to test out the different tyres for yourself but unfortunately rim brakes complicate that an awful lot these days.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 2:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:06 am
Posts: 45
I have really nice wheels and would rather find what works best for them. But I think the general idea of volume vs weight is pretty interesting. I've always heard wider is better, but I just wanted to check that was actually the case.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:29 pm
Posts: 31
jazclrint wrote:
HA 2.1 Evo TL-ready is listed at 475g vs 545g for the same 2.25 version. I usually run 30-32psi front and +3psi in the rear.


Try this: instead of thinking about widths, think about volumes. The 2.25" is much higher volume, and that means you can run a lower tire pressure and get the same support. The lower pressure gives you a bigger contact patch and better surface conformance, and that gives you better traction and lower rolling resistance.

This only works if you actually run lower pressures, and 32psi is not low pressure, even at 230lbs. Try lowering your tire pressure. I'd start at 24psi and go from there. If you're running tubes, convert to tubeless and see if you can get pressures down to 20psi in front. Once you're using the 2.25 to its full potential, you can then consider whether the weight savings of a 2.1 is worth going back to 30+ psi.

Many people will tell you that once you've gotten your pressures down low, you'll never want to go low-volume/medium-pressure again. If I had permission to spend your retirement funds, I'd get you wide rims and put a lightweight 2.4 on the front like the Schwalbe Rocket Ron.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:06 am
Posts: 45
Wow. That is low. I am already running tubeless. I had a set of RoRos in 2.25 before and less than 30 just didn't feel right, and I's get cuts in the center of the tread. But I'll give it a go as these Nics were free and I have a back up set of tires.


Top
   
Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:01 am 


Top
   
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

   Similar Topics   Author   Replies   Views   Last post 
There are no new unread posts for this topic. Large Volume Tubulars

in Everything wheels

Curious George

7

520

Tue Apr 12, 2016 12:29 pm

audiojan View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Gravel tires vs Road tires (pure speed)

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Gravel

wheelsONfire

29

3009

Wed Aug 03, 2016 1:57 pm

Tomstr View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Super Light weight Tires for clincher wheels.Continental GP Super Sonic 700x23 ???

[ Go to page: 1 2 ]

in Road

gerardk1111

15

766

Fri Jul 01, 2016 4:28 pm

gerardk1111 View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. Help with tires

in Road

isarug

2

204

Mon Aug 08, 2016 10:34 pm

isarug View the latest post

There are no new unread posts for this topic. 23 mm tires on a C17 (25 mm) rim

in Road

speedyvelo1

7

555

Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:37 pm

dj97223 View the latest post


All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited