Acceptable chainstay clearance for XTR FC-M985 crank
Moderator: Moderator Team
So I installed my new lovely new FC-M985 cranks on my Cannondale Flash F3 Alloy, and noticed the clearance between the driveside crankarm and the chainstay is quite tight (about 3mm), but not critical.
I just wanted to confirm the tight 3mm clearance is acceptable for this crank? And I wonder what is the best case scenario for this crank since the q-factor is 3mm less on each side than the M980- ie most frames would have this same issue?
The bottom bracket is 73mm so I have one 2.5mm spacer on the driveside cup. I gather I can't cheat and add another spacer since the non-drive side wouldn't have enough spindle?
Other than that, amazing crank, light and very well finished!
Many thanks
I just wanted to confirm the tight 3mm clearance is acceptable for this crank? And I wonder what is the best case scenario for this crank since the q-factor is 3mm less on each side than the M980- ie most frames would have this same issue?
The bottom bracket is 73mm so I have one 2.5mm spacer on the driveside cup. I gather I can't cheat and add another spacer since the non-drive side wouldn't have enough spindle?
Other than that, amazing crank, light and very well finished!
Many thanks
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
-
- Shop Owner
- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:02 am
- Location: NoVA/DC
3mm is fine. cranks dont flex much in that direction when in the rearmost position.
Many thanks for the reply thisisatest, pretty much what I was thinking/hoping.
I knew the M985 crank had a small q-factor, but I was surprised to see how small the clearance was! I can see these cranks wouldn't be compatible with a lot of frames eh?
I knew the M985 crank had a small q-factor, but I was surprised to see how small the clearance was! I can see these cranks wouldn't be compatible with a lot of frames eh?
just bought the same cranks, and my clearance is even less. 2mm max. don't know if it functionally matters, but just looking at it is a bit disconcerting. do you notice that your non-drive side has more clearance? the difference is noticeable on mine.
Gchan wrote:just bought the same cranks, and my clearance is even less. 2mm max. don't know if it functionally matters, but just looking at it is a bit disconcerting. do you notice that your non-drive side has more clearance? the difference is noticeable on mine.
Yes, you're right the clearance on the non-drive side is about 4-5mm. Sounds like I'm not the only one then! I'm guessing this is the price you pay for a low q-factor.
As a follow-up to this I have noticed the drive-side crank arm on my M985 crank has a slight rub mark, as well as on the chainstay. Only very minor, but it is definitely making contact at some point.
So it seems the crank/frame is flexing and under certain conditions perhaps with additional mud there is a rub.
Not good, but do I need to worry about it? I'll post a pic.
So it seems the crank/frame is flexing and under certain conditions perhaps with additional mud there is a rub.
Not good, but do I need to worry about it? I'll post a pic.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
I tried fitting one (44/30T) to a Trek 9.9 (2007/8?), and the large chainring fouls the chainstay before the crank seats against the BB bearing!
It might fit if I remove the chainsuck plate, but I'm not gonna risk that!
I've now fitted it to my SC Blur XC - it's very close on that - around 2-3mm max, but does fit.
Anyone else had the same issue with other frames?
It might fit if I remove the chainsuck plate, but I'm not gonna risk that!
I've now fitted it to my SC Blur XC - it's very close on that - around 2-3mm max, but does fit.
Anyone else had the same issue with other frames?